California Highway Patrol Seizes Medical Records Of Woman An Officer Was Caught On Tape Beating
from the all-part-of-the-exoneration-process dept
Today's demonstration of post-brutality scrambling is brought to you by the California Highway Patrol. First off, we'll take a look at the "alleged" brutality, which looks incredibly similar to non-alleged brutality. (Apologies for the watermark the person who recorded the incident slapped all over the video.)
This head-punching (David Diaz, who recorded the incident, counts 15 punches in total) was performed as an act of civil service, according to the CHP.
Speaking to the television station ABC7, the California Highway Patrol said that the officer had ordered the woman to stop walking, out of fears for her safety.She failed to follow this order, possibly due to mental illness. After the unnamed officer's fists were finished ensuring her safety, the CHP sent the woman to a mental health facility and refused to allow her family to see her. The video surfaced shortly thereafter, forcing the CHP to make further statements about how "physically combative" the woman was, as well as expressing its utmost desire
"We're looking at every possibility, every fact, every circumstance that have contributed to this situation, and we're going to try to come to a just conclusion," Highway Patrol Assistant Chief Chris O'Quinn said at a news conference on Friday."Just," in this context, seems to actually mean "exonerating." The investigation continues, apparently, albeit in unexpected (and terrible) directions.
California Highway Patrol investigators have seized the medical records of a woman seen on video being repeatedly punched by one of its officers on the side of a Los Angeles freeway.Why the CHP would need to seize the records, rather than just view them, is completely inexplicable. The person served the warrant noted that it was issued to grab "property or things" as part of a felony investigation, which apparently included communications with her doctor about her well-being and "references to her attorney."
Chris Arevalo, executive administrator for psychiatric services at Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center, confirmed that the CHP served the search warrant Tuesday for Marlene Pinnock's records.
I'm sure the ongoing investigation will clarify the CHP's need to violate its victim's privacy before this debacle is wrapped up. That's how it works. But it looks like an uphill battle. The statement released by the CHP commissioner sounds like even he was caught off-guard by this bizarre, smells-like-a-cover-up records seizure.
"I think what they're trying to do is, they don't have a statement from her, and they're trying to find that out," Farrow said. "I don't think the CHP is trying to put her on trial or make it an issue about her. What I'm looking at is entirely about the circumstances, we all saw what happened. Our job is to find out the why and the how."So, the CHP gets statements by hospitalizing someone and seizing their medical records. While these records may offer some insight as to why she didn't immediately follow the officer's instructions, they really don't fill the "statement" void -- unless the CHP is going to further violate her privacy by releasing a statement on its own behalf using information gleaned from the seized records. As it stands now, it looks exactly like the CHP is planning to "make it an issue about her." If it isn't, then perhaps it might quid pro quo with the release of the disciplinary records of involved officers.
Moving on from this larger wrongness, I'd like to take a little time to point to the complicity of the Associated Press in the low-level whitewashing of this latest development by using that famous law enforcement standby, the passive voice.
My first notification came to me via Officer.com, whose headline read:
CHP Seizes Medical Records of Woman Seen Punched"Seen punched?" Punched by whom? By the CHP, of course, not that this headline indicates that. As far as this headline goes, it may have just been a random mugging. A more accurate headline would be "CHP Seizes Medical Records of Woman They Were Seen Punching." Clumsy, but more honest. Considering this AP story was reposted by a police-centric site, the passive voice is completely expected. But it's not just cop sites like Officer.com. It's other places as well.
CHP seizes medical records of woman in scuffle with copNot only does it side more with the CHP, but it also makes it appear as though the CHP seized her records during the "scuffle."
We expect this use of the passive voice from police officers. The media doesn't really need to assist law enforcement spokespeople in their blame-deflection efforts. When misconduct allegations arise, they're always followed by details of "weapons discharging" and innocent bystanders "receiving gunshot wounds" and officers never striking anybody but always "responding" to actions, movements or words from some person whose personal safety was ensured by hospitalization.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: california highway patrol, chips, medical records, videotape
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wait til they find out she's deaf...
After millions of tazer hits, we'll fine them for using up all of the police departments non-lethal response gear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Officer assaulted by woman repeatedly beating his fists with her head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seizure fever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seizure fever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pig Hunting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pig Hunting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even More Honest Headline...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Even More Honest Headline...
Mustache-twirling Thuggees Attempt Homicide, Fail, Try and Cover Up with More Thuggee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Even More Honest Headline...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Until these thugs are held personally responsible this bullshit will never end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: personal liability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: personal liability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
Now if the police union held say an insurance policy that indemnified the government for its members actions, then guess who might be policing the police?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
What having the tax payers, pay, does not do is punish the perpetrators (line officers) or their enablers (supervisors and unions) in any way.
Check this story and John Oliver video about how punishment works in the US. Only a little off topic.
http://www.vox.com/2014/7/21/5922445/prison-john-oliver-american-muppets
The over zealous police officers out there will probably never enjoy their sincerely deserved 4x6 cell (see the video).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They likely what the medical records for a different reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given the privacy protections, the only way to get the medical records is a warrant, and we'd all (me included) be complaining if the hospital had handed them over without due process of law. (A warrant.)
The proper legal language verb for what is done with a warrant is "seize". I believe you'll find it in, oh yes, the Fourth Amendment: "...particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
'Why the CHP would need to seize the records, rather than just view them, is completely inexplicable.' Er, no -- I just explained that. If the CHP showed up at the hospital and said "Hi -- we'd like to look at patient Jane's records", there's only one acceptable response by the hospital: "Come back with a warrant." So, they did.
'The person served the warrant noted that it was issued to grab "property or things" as part of a felony investigation, which apparently included communications with her doctor about her well-being and "references to her attorney."'
Er, yes. The "things" would be the medical records, which are the communications with her doctor about her well-being. And, if anybody served a warrant on me and didn't at least ask if I was represented by an attorney, I'd be righteously pissed.
For all we know the felony under investigation is the cop's conduct -- I'd like to think so.
tldr: Yes, please report, please even editorialize, but don't sensationalize -- it just kills credibility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Considering not even al-Qa'ida do that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
DD: Listen here pal 'o mine you aint seen any line crossing yet, my cousin Patrolman Peter Dickwad was just getting warmed up and remembered how much he hates it when his Grande® skinny half-caff extra hot latte gets cold so he took a break to go finish it.
"… but can we dial the sensationalism down a bit?"
DD: This I actually agree with, don't make us come over there and make you stop typing.
"Given the privacy protections, the only way to get the medical records is a warrant, and we'd all (me included) be complaining if the hospital had handed them over without due process of law."
DD: Bullcrap. Hogwash! Have none of you bootlicking pleebs heard of exigent circumstances? This crap got splashed all over the web and you sissys got your panties in a wad about a couple of good right crosses. So naturally I would have just gone over there and gotten the records with me and my SWAT team buddies (we are all on the SWAT team by the way, just part time and it effing ROCKS!) and taken down that location before those sniveling doctors and stuff destroyed evidence!
"The proper legal language verb for what is done with a warrant is "seize". I believe you'll find it in, oh yes, the Fourth Amendment: "...particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.""
DD: And I don’t give two farts what the proper term is if I want it I'll sieze it by any means necessary, like if I got to sieze your neck until you die to get it, whatever "It" is.
"'Why the CHP would need to seize the records, rather than just view them, is completely inexplicable.' Er, no -- I just explained that. If the CHP showed up at the hospital and said "Hi -- we'd like to look at patient Jane's records", there's only one acceptable response by the hospital: "Come back with a warrant." So, they did."
DD: Irrelevant, don't matter, NEXT!
"'The person served the warrant noted that it was issued to grab "property or things" as part of a felony investigation, which apparently included communications with her doctor about her well-being and "references to her attorney."'"
DD: and they better do like my prom date and "give it up" or there gonna' get what's coming to them next!
"For all we know the felony under investigation is the cop's conduct -- I'd like to think so."
DD: Trust me I asked Patrolman Peter about this It's not about him, she's going down for this stunt she pulled. Hard!
"tldr: Yes, please report, please even editorialize, but don't sensationalize -- it just kills credibility."
DD: You are so deluded! You want to know what really kills credibility? Not being a COP! Suk that "citizen"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ok, yea, we get it. The 4th amendment uses the word "seize" and so they did. They didn't just make copies of them, which they could have easily done (and still can), but they didn't.
So guess who does NOT have access to those records now? Her doctor(s) and other healthcare pros, for one. Her attorney, for another (which I'm sure is the REAL reason they seized the records anyway).
You're missing the forest for the trees. They are fucking her over to cover their own asses. The only reason I can think of for them needing those records is to mount the defense, "Look -- she's a looney! He HAD to pulverize her face!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Here's a clue: nearly zero current clinical documentation is on paper these days anyway, thanks to the Meaningful Use regs.
Chances are: they showed up with the warrant, the general counsel came down to verify it and offer guidance (yes, that much delay is accepted, absent exigent circumstances) and some clerk burned a CD and said "here you go."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dipstick "citizens' who don't know their place, with cameras, make us good cops look bad.
Idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Likewise cops who place themselves above the law need to be put in their place.
The State and Federal courts of this country on a number of occasions have confirmed the right of citizens to record police in the performance of their duties.
If you can't stand the heat get a new line of work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:Dipstick "citizens' who don't know their place,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What gives cops a free pass to let the bad ones shoot everything up and get away with it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
1. Cop has women walking out into obviously very very busy highway.
2. He's chasing her on foot risking his life trying to save hers.
3. He can see what happens if she causes an accident on highway - lots of other folks could get hurt/killed.
4. She ignores his commands causing him to have to physically restrain her.
5. Probably he doesn't relish the idea he has to run out into highway to save her, possibly getting killed himself.
6. He'd probably say good riddance (not good but realistic) and let her get hit, but someone else would probably get hurt and he would burn for that too.
7. She fights back when he's trying to grab her, he way over reacts(but in the moment I can see how he could, just needs to be a better cop)...
8. He loses it, takes out his frustration, is she trying to bit him, hit him, etc.. all on the side of the highway just begging to get killed by a car/truck that didn't see everything.
Does he need to be disciplined, "YES" - in this case does he need to vilified -- not so sure. A lot of extenuating circumstances here. It's not like it 8-10 cops beating a drunk passed out guy w/night sticks. he's one guy trying save a psycho, who's not being cooperative, all why trying dodge cars on a busy busy highway, hoping he survives and can go home to his family at the end of the shift. I don't see much of a win-win result for anyone in this case.
Of course as usual the press has a field day, everyone pontificates, CHP over reacts too trying save face, no one wins -- sorta like the original situation...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
Yeah, that'll work as a defense ... NOT.
There's no excuse for a cop going as overboard as that, and I don't care how frustrated he was. Citizens don't pay cops salaries so we can can be "beat about the head and face with their fists" ... for our own safety no less.
Gimme a break.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
Good thing those officers cared so much about others safety that they gunned down such a man.
http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/03/26/citizen-video-contradicts-albuquerque-police-claims -slain-man-shot-first/
In this case your defending a bad cop and every cop that is collaborating to hide his actions. Your just as bad as those trying to defend a cop beating up a woman just because he could.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
Nope. Police have no duty to protect anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
Which would be different than what's happening now... how?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You get what you give
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure this is that bad, bad cop yes, bad situation?
8. He loses it, takes out his frustration, is she trying to bit him, hit him, etc.. all on the side of the highway just begging to get killed by a car/truck that didn't see everything.
Even if that is what happened, this guy clearly cannot handle being a police officer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What bugs me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What bugs me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not her property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: not her property
You do realize that when served with a warrant, the clinic doesn't have the luxury of saying hold on a second we're going to make you copies of the files that your warrant is allowing you to have.
Do you have any clue what might happen to the clinic staff if they tried to interfere with the search warrant. their only option was complete and total cooperation and assisting the officers in gathering the information, anything less would have landed them in hot water themselves.
And no establishment on the planet has the authority to punish them for complying with a search warrant, no matter how wrong the warrant was. There is now mechanism built in to the law for challenging a warrant prior to it being served.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: not her property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: not her property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's a clue: nearly zero current clinical documentation is on paper these days anyway, thanks to the Meaningful Use regs.
Chances are: they showed up with the warrant, the general counsel came down to verify it and offer guidance (yes, that much delay is accepted, absent exigent circumstances) and some clerk burned a CD and said "here you go."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The instant that woman gained the ire of a renegade policeman her fate was sealed. And I think we all know what will happen to that officer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
its obvious
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Small fire breaks out on the Hindenburg."
"Luxury liner, Titanic, takes on a little water."
"NASA lander on rocky surface."
"NSA only collecting a little data. Millions of terrorists identified!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Erik Estrada connects with one of his fans."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Urban terrorist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Urban terrorist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Assuring personal safety
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Being assaulted BY a police officer is now a felony for the VICTIM!
Wait, wait, WAIT! Are you telling me it is now a FELONY to be brutally beaten by the police?? WTF world are we living in now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To intimidate and brutalize has replaced to protect and serve.
Police murder with impunity at worst get time off or a promotion. They are organized crime at best, psycopaths hiding behind a badge at worst.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can rest assured HIPPA has exceptions for search warrants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Important information
An important thing to note from that lawsuit is that they also siezed Ms. Pinnock's shredded clothing and a list of visitors to her hospital room. It is not at all likely that those would be used as evidence against the officer, so it seems quite clear they are pursuing a felony charge against her.
The visitor list is especially puzzling, unless they think someone is bringing drugs to the hospital.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Important information
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man dies suffering heart attack during arrest - Eric Garner Police Brutality [GRAPHIC]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting records
All of that said...that cop was so far over the line it's not funny; CHS is in CYA mode; and her civil lawyer is, and should be, smiling all the way to the courthouse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here a woman is punched, as if a disembodied arm rose up out of the ground to strike her.
--Michael W. Perry, Chesterton on War and Peace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ninja turtles move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: HI
lol. I noticed this weird thread a week ago or so myself.
This other article from 2000 keeps getting comments begging for money and loan offers all the time:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/000324/1149204.shtml
There's another article (I don't remember the url) that keeps getting comments from people who want to sell their own organs for money.
Apparently, there is a weird, dark, sub-culture that lives in the comment sections of old articles here at Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: HI
Well I don't think the ninja turtles need anyone to stick up for them honestly, they can take care of themselves, right? Anyway, I'm just wondering why you're posting the saga of the ninja turtles go to Canada on this thread about police abuse. Any particular reason?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: HI
I don't think that the Ninja Turtles are available anyways.
They are pretty busy in Charleston helping Viacom put the smack down on little cable company operators:
http://www.wvgazette.com/article/20141024/GZ01/141029428
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Woman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]