If the person wants to find something on the web, then yes, they'll go back from the news site from to the search engine, because search engines and news sites fulfill different purposes.
The security issue with HTTPS is that if a certificate authority has their key stolen (or secretly cooperates with a third party) you can be tricked into establishing a connection with an impersonator, since the impersonator will have what appears to be a valid certificate. However, this is an issue with any end-to-end system which uses a certificate authority type scheme. The only way to avoid this is to personally validate the private key of the other party, like with key signing parties.
Re: Yeah, WE KNOW the "evidence": it's your attack that was WRON
By "attack", I'm assuming you mean the accusation that Shiva is a liar/fraud? If so, I don't think Shiva agrees with you. That is, I don't think that Shiva's attitude is:
"I might be mistaken in my belief that I invented email, and if Mike Masnick merely said that I was mistaken in my belief I'd have no problem with him."
That's not at all the impression I'm getting from him.
Re: More eye-rolling won't help. Not after years promoting pirac
If all creators are in favor of taking current copyrights and extending them, at what point will they be extended enough? Or are creators all in favor of perpetual copyrights?
Hypothetical: there's multiple groups of attackers, each acting against a single election machine vendor. If the particular vendor was disclosed, that particular group would be alerted that they have an information leak that they need to fix. But if the disclosure is kept to "some county in Florida", then there's so many counties with so many different vendors that it doesn't pin things down enough.
Also, I'm annoyed when you do things like claim that intelligent conservatives have been silenced but refuse to name those conservatives, or claim that something goes against common law but refuse to name what parts of common law, areas where not backing up your claims have nothing to do with maintaining your anonymity.
So those reviews of lawyers you're talking about are reviews that you have written? Otherwise I don't see why citing those reviews would imperil your anonymity.
Hopefully the laws barring these contracts are what will be thrown out. Otherwise, the white-collar professionals are sitting ducks for "reputation blackmail."
Makers of false statements can already be sued under current defamation laws.
On the post: Huawei Busted Helping African Governments Spy On The Press, Political Opponents
Re: you have been warned
What, even Chinese who happen to be citizens?
On the post: Attorney General William Barr Declares War On The General Public
This only applies if you comply with an order. If you comply with a request, then by complying you've waived any right to complain about it later.
On the post: Whining About Big Tech Doesn't Protect Journalism
Re: Re: Re:
If the person wants to find something on the web, then yes, they'll go back from the news site from to the search engine, because search engines and news sites fulfill different purposes.
On the post: Whining About Big Tech Doesn't Protect Journalism
Re: Re: Re:
How are people who don't already visit a news site meant to find articles on that site, if not for search engines?
On the post: As Germany Floats The Idea Of Encryption Backdoors, Facebook May Already Be Planning To Undermine Its Own Encryption
https *IS* end-to-end encryption
The security issue with HTTPS is that if a certificate authority has their key stolen (or secretly cooperates with a third party) you can be tricked into establishing a connection with an impersonator, since the impersonator will have what appears to be a valid certificate. However, this is an issue with any end-to-end system which uses a certificate authority type scheme. The only way to avoid this is to personally validate the private key of the other party, like with key signing parties.
On the post: Laying Out All The Evidence: Shiva Ayyadurai Did Not Invent Email
Re: Yeah, WE KNOW the "evidence": it's your attack that was WRON
By "attack", I'm assuming you mean the accusation that Shiva is a liar/fraud? If so, I don't think Shiva agrees with you. That is, I don't think that Shiva's attitude is:
That's not at all the impression I'm getting from him.
On the post: Getting Worse Part 2: Intuit's CEO Informs Employees That Free To File Was Hidden For The Public's Own Good
Will it stay that way come next tax season?
On the post: Canadian Committee Publishes Ludicrous Fantasy Pretending To Be Copyright Reform Analysis
Re: More eye-rolling won't help. Not after years promoting pirac
If all creators are in favor of taking current copyrights and extending them, at what point will they be extended enough? Or are creators all in favor of perpetual copyrights?
On the post: Our Legal Dispute With Shiva Ayyadurai Is Now Over
Re:
I think his position is that calling Ayyadurai a liar doesn't legally count as opinion based on disclosed fact.
On the post: Our Legal Dispute With Shiva Ayyadurai Is Now Over
Re: Re: Re: Millionaire MM now asks YOU to subsidize his lying!
If you defend yourself against a lawsuit and win, the fact that winning cost money doesn't make you wrong.
On the post: Our Legal Dispute With Shiva Ayyadurai Is Now Over
Re: Millionaire MM now asks YOU to subsidize his lying!
What did he get wrong about it?
On the post: FBI Tells The Governor Of Florida About Election Hacking, But Says He Can't Tell Anyone Else
To play Devil's Advocate...
Hypothetical: there's multiple groups of attackers, each acting against a single election machine vendor. If the particular vendor was disclosed, that particular group would be alerted that they have an information leak that they need to fix. But if the disclosure is kept to "some county in Florida", then there's so many counties with so many different vendors that it doesn't pin things down enough.
On the post: DC Legislators Push FOIA Amendment That Would Shield Government Emails From FOIA Requesters [UPDATE]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Polygraphs are used regularly because they can be used to apply psychological pressure to the questionee. Not because they have any sort of accuracy.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Also, I'm annoyed when you do things like claim that intelligent conservatives have been silenced but refuse to name those conservatives, or claim that something goes against common law but refuse to name what parts of common law, areas where not backing up your claims have nothing to do with maintaining your anonymity.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So those reviews of lawyers you're talking about are reviews that you have written? Otherwise I don't see why citing those reviews would imperil your anonymity.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re: Re: Re:
I know you don't answer to me. I'm merely expressing annoyance that you keep making claims without backing them up.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Non-disparagement agreements aren't going to help with that.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re: Re:
Makers of false statements can already be sued under current defamation laws.
On the post: Miami Plastic Surgeon Sues Two Patients For Negative Reviews After He Had Them Sign Illegal Non Disparagement Agreements
Re:
Yes. Put up or shut up. Please.
On the post: Higbee Tries To Shake Down Forum For Deep Linked Photograph
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Why? I link to a page put up by the copyright holder wouldn't be in any way infringing.
Next >>