The only way I would agree with that is if the guidelines the program had for identifying "harassment" be incredibly narrow and strict, and only in cases where it manages to check off as positive for all those strict and narrow guidelines that it is allowed to automatically takedown the alleged "harassment". If the program finds something it's unsure of and fits a minimum of 90% of the criteria, then it's handed to an actual human to look at and judge for themselves. In all other cases, it ignores the content and moves on. This should avoid the problem of false flags like with the ContentID system on YouTube, where if it thinks a video contains 5 seconds of possibly infringing content. By which I mean as few as possible while still satisfying those ask for such a thing.
At which point I expect everyone involved with or reporting on the case will "disappear" and TD and every other site having any mention of it will be "seized".
Because I honestly expect that at the current rate we'll be hearing about patents that cover the entire concept/process of encryption. At which point they'll start by taking every company in Silicon Valley and 95%-99% percent of the internet to court.
Hell while we're at it why stop there? Let's get a ton of patents on gravity and charge everyone and everything in the galaxy for violating patent law! The cases against black holes will be rather interesting.
Let's assume that they do end up prosecuting all those kids and they all end up on sex offerender's register. As a sex offender they can't have contact with minors, which includes their classmates. Ergo they can't go to school.
Here's a toast to horrible nature that is humanity!
And why I look forward to the heat death of the universe! 95% of you seem dedicated to leeching off others' success with filing these patent infringement cases. Between that and the horror that is my family, I've learned that you can never trust another human being, for the second you do, they betray that trust and stab you in back and leave you to flounder and die. Assuming they're not about on the same intellectual level as your average potted plant. Granted I've got a uniquely horrible family to grow up around which significantly colors my view of the world. My father is the type that refuses to ever admit he's wrong. Kind that sees an everyday mistake(ex:2x3=5) and rather than admit he's wrong says he's right and is willing to go to court and argue it out there. The amount times I've tried to explain to him that gravity does exist and isn't a fallacy invented by the CIA to benefit their overlords in the matrix(yes he believes that the matrix is a real thing and not just part of a movie). Still to this day he demands to see Obama's birth certificate, even though my mother has pointed out that if the man ever does he'll just claim its a forgery. Granted I'm just reflecting on the tragedy that is the 20 years and 9 days that I've lived. Feel free to report this if I'm just going mad.
As I've been saying to my family: the people trying to get into the presidential candidate lineup sounds like a bad joke, something you'd read on the onion or the like; an arrogant as hell billionaire, a former First Lady, a member of the bush family and the kardashians walk into the White House.....
They kinda "forget" that stuff, same you "forget" you were the one who broke an extremely valuable that has run through your family so that your relatives won't go and put your severed hea on a pike.
On the post: Eric Schmidt Suggests Building A 'Spell Checker' For Online Harassment And Other Bad Things Online
Just going to play devil's advocate for once.
If the program finds something it's unsure of and fits a minimum of 90% of the criteria, then it's handed to an actual human to look at and judge for themselves.
In all other cases, it ignores the content and moves on.
This should avoid the problem of false flags like with the ContentID system on YouTube, where if it thinks a video contains 5 seconds of possibly infringing content. By which I mean as few as possible while still satisfying those ask for such a thing.
On the post: The Two Leading Presidential Candidates -- Clinton And Trump -- Are Both Mocking Free Speech On The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Rep. Michael McCaul Proposes 'Commission' To 'Force' Silicon Valley To Undermine Encryption
Re:
On the post: After Illegally Censoring Websites For Five Years On Bogus Copyright Charges, US Gov't Quietly 'Returns' Two Domains
Re: Sue ICE for their entire budget
On the post: Patent Troll Sues Everyone For Infringing On Encryption-Related Patent By Encrypting Their Websites
This is just nonsensical,
Hell while we're at it why stop there? Let's get a ton of patents on gravity and charge everyone and everything in the galaxy for violating patent law! The cases against black holes will be rather interesting.
On the post: Toy Maker Vtech Hacked, Revealing Kids' Selfies, Chat Logs, & Even Voice Recordings
Re: Vtech needs to be sued out of business quickly
You mean wet dream, right? Because all around, I do believe that's more accurate. Not to be disgusting.
On the post: Our Response To The Latest Ridiculous Legal Threat Against Us: Milorad Trkulja Can Go Pound Sand
You know mike
On the post: Comcast Tests Net Neutrality By Letting Its Own Streaming Service Bypass Usage Caps
A streaming service named "Stream"!
On the post: Chipotle Exposes Private Data By Sending HR E-mails Via Unowned Domain, Doesn't See The Problem
Re: Small silver lining
On the post: That Didn't Take Long: MLB Plans Action Against Fallout 4 David Ortiz Mod
No sense
On the post: We Have The 'Criminal Charges' Patrick Zarrelli Claims He Filed Against Our Writer, And They're Not What He Thinks
My only reaction
Seriously though, Zarrelli must either be completely delusional or he is doing some REALLY good drugs.
On the post: 'Hundreds' Of Teens Found Sexting At A Single School And Everyone Seems Unsure Of How To Proceed
Another facet of the problem
The law is fucking stupid.
On the post: 'Hundreds' Of Teens Found Sexting At A Single School And Everyone Seems Unsure Of How To Proceed
Re:
On the post: Court Has An Opportunity To Finally End The East Texas Patent Troll Docket
Here's a toast to horrible nature that is humanity!
Between that and the horror that is my family, I've learned that you can never trust another human being, for the second you do, they betray that trust and stab you in back and leave you to flounder and die. Assuming they're not about on the same intellectual level as your average potted plant.
Granted I've got a uniquely horrible family to grow up around which significantly colors my view of the world. My father is the type that refuses to ever admit he's wrong. Kind that sees an everyday mistake(ex:2x3=5) and rather than admit he's wrong says he's right and is willing to go to court and argue it out there. The amount times I've tried to explain to him that gravity does exist and isn't a fallacy invented by the CIA to benefit their overlords in the matrix(yes he believes that the matrix is a real thing and not just part of a movie). Still to this day he demands to see Obama's birth certificate, even though my mother has pointed out that if the man ever does he'll just claim its a forgery.
Granted I'm just reflecting on the tragedy that is the 20 years and 9 days that I've lived. Feel free to report this if I'm just going mad.
On the post: Fertility Company Bullies Unhappy Customer With Bogus Legal Threats And Nonexistent Lawyers
lightening
On the post: Roca Labs Loses Its Lawsuit Against Pissed Consumer (Badly)
Sad
On the post: Administration Won't Seek Holes In Encryption... But That's Just THIS Administration
On the post: James Comey Says 'Dozens' Of Terrorists Have Eluded The FBI Thanks To Encryption
Re: The FBI can't read its own emails?
On the post: TPP Also Locks In Broken Anti-Circumvention Rules That Destroy Your Freedoms
What's next?
On the post: Microsoft Forgets To Renew Domain... Again
Next >>