it doesnt make me wonder one bit. they know it. you know they know it... i know they know it... they know they know it... but thats not the problem. knowing that they know it and being able to PROVE they know it in a court of law are two completely different things. and even if you could prove they knew it.... so what? they basically scammed millions for years doing this kinda crap and if they get caught... they get fined a minor percentage of what they pulled in.
all CEOs know this is being done and its being done deliberately because it makes money... even if they get caught red handed and get fined, they're still going to have more money in the end.
no, your assuming that any negativity is all liberal hate. yes, i agree there is such a thing but thats NOT whats going on in all cases and to blindly assume/accept that it is is one of the major problems that led us down this sorry road we are on currently.
you also come off as suggesting that i see all issues as being the same thing, and clearly they are not, i also said nothing about russian sex and hacking so im not quite sure why you are including it in your reply to me unless its a separate thought that was just not clearly laid out as such?
its not all hypocritical liberal hate. while i did not vote for him, i was firmly in the camp of, lets really find out what he actually is going to do first before we all go down the path of being an idiot calling for impeachment before he has even been sworn in.
i am currently horrified by his actions and he is, in my mind, the biggest threat to national security since bin laden got a bug up his ass.
i tend to vote republican and have my entire life.... so... liberal hate? no. genuine and legitimate concern.
Re: Re: Re: No tax returns, no presidency... You're fired Mr. Scrotum...
at this point i couldnt care less about his tax returns. he is business tycoon with multiple failed businesses. there is going to be plenty there for everyone to freak out about and would only serve to distract from the larger issues that we have now. those being; this man is clearly not fit to run any branch of government at any level.
stop following the circus and the lights and lets discuss the real topics of a president attempting to use unconstitutional and unethical means to reach his ends.
I think the distinction is what the main focus of airbnb is.
the state doesnt regulate me selling my guitar. i can use any number of sites that will allow me to list it either free of charge or for a small fee. But they dont focus on selling only guitars so if someone decides to advertise hooker and blow parties on the go, they are protected by section 230.
airbnb does not have any other function though. since motels and hotels are regulated, and this is the sole purpose of airbnb, it too should fall under the same regulations as motel 6. since i could be advertising a place for rent that included hooker and blow parties- airbnb would have section 230 protections against the hooker and blow party part... but they are still functioning in their one single design of connecting people looking to rent their space with people looking to rent spaces and in that specific function, they would not qualify for 230 protections.
course thats just my own personal viewpoint and im no laywer.
Re: Re: Typical GOOG apology-- you don't get something for nothing
and it wont matter in any way.... it isnt the news sites that took the action, its legislation. Sure they will run back to google screaming for them to turn it back up... but the spanish govt has pretty much forced google into the position with no alternative way out.
seeing how i dont care for her music in the first place, i must say UMG, way to go about making damn sure i continue to not hear her music going forward.
but uh... that get lucky song... i was kinda diggin that & i think im gonna go check some more
On the post: Broadband ISP CenturyLink Accused Of Wells-Fargo-Esque Scam That Bilked Millions From Customers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ah yisss...
but thats not the problem. knowing that they know it and being able to PROVE they know it in a court of law are two completely different things. and even if you could prove they knew it.... so what? they basically scammed millions for years doing this kinda crap and if they get caught... they get fined a minor percentage of what they pulled in.
all CEOs know this is being done and its being done deliberately because it makes money... even if they get caught red handed and get fined, they're still going to have more money in the end.
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 10 steps to Fascism..
you also come off as suggesting that i see all issues as being the same thing, and clearly they are not, i also said nothing about russian sex and hacking so im not quite sure why you are including it in your reply to me unless its a separate thought that was just not clearly laid out as such?
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No tax returns, no presidency... You're fired Mr. Scrotum...
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: Re: 10 steps to Fascism..
i am currently horrified by his actions and he is, in my mind, the biggest threat to national security since bin laden got a bug up his ass.
i tend to vote republican and have my entire life.... so... liberal hate? no. genuine and legitimate concern.
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: Re: No tax returns, no presidency... You're fired Mr. Scrotum...
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: No tax returns, no presidency... You're fired Mr. Scrotum...
stop following the circus and the lights and lets discuss the real topics of a president attempting to use unconstitutional and unethical means to reach his ends.
On the post: Trump Muzzles Federal Employees; Reporters Start Asking For Leaks
Re: Re: Badlands
the time to have their back is "always". Regardless of your feelings of both the previous and current administration.
pretty sure Edmund Burke has a few wise words on the subject. you may want to look em up.
On the post: Court Not Impressed By Airbnb's Argument Against The City Of San Francisco
Re: Re:
the state doesnt regulate me selling my guitar. i can use any number of sites that will allow me to list it either free of charge or for a small fee. But they dont focus on selling only guitars so if someone decides to advertise hooker and blow parties on the go, they are protected by section 230.
airbnb does not have any other function though. since motels and hotels are regulated, and this is the sole purpose of airbnb, it too should fall under the same regulations as motel 6. since i could be advertising a place for rent that included hooker and blow parties- airbnb would have section 230 protections against the hooker and blow party part... but they are still functioning in their one single design of connecting people looking to rent their space with people looking to rent spaces and in that specific function, they would not qualify for 230 protections.
course thats just my own personal viewpoint and im no laywer.
On the post: Techdirt Podcast Episode 95: A Presidential Tech Policy Wish List
Re: My wish list...
Election 2016 - no matter who wins, we all loose.
On the post: Tobacco Carve-Out From ISDS Starts To Spread: Another Nail In The Coffin Of Corporate Sovereignty
Re: Tobacco Carve-out
On the post: US Chamber Of Commerce Complains About People 'Pirating' The Presidential Debate
Re: On to something here
On the post: Paris, France To Sue Fox News For Being Fox News
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Help Create Some Neil deGrasse Tysonisms: Tautologically Meaningless Solutions To All The World's Problems
Re: Re: Re: Re:
by the way- my above point? 78chtrs. it can be done.
On the post: Yet Another Website Kills Comments, Despite Study Showing You Can Have Civil Comments If You Give A Damn
Re: on that note...
On the post: How Congress Secretly Just Legitimized Questionable NSA Mass Surveillance Tool
Re:
On the post: Keurig's Controversial Java 'DRM' Defeated By A Single Piece Of Scotch Tape
Re:
i can tell you that they do fairly well as a brownian motion producer though
On the post: Senator Whitehouse Is Very Angry About A Made Up Google Search And A Made Up Pirate Bay
Re: Re: What.
they appear to all be in this thread?
On the post: Google Pulls Out The Nuclear Option: Shuts Down Google News In Spain Over Ridiculous Copyright Law
Re: Re: Typical GOOG apology-- you don't get something for nothing
Sure they will run back to google screaming for them to turn it back up... but the spanish govt has pretty much forced google into the position with no alternative way out.
On the post: No, Tech Companies Can't Easily Create A 'ContentID' For Harassment, And It Would Be A Disaster If They Did
Re: Re:
On the post: Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Universal Music Takes Down Fun Mashup Of Taylor Swift's 'Shake It Off' And 1989 Aerobics Video
but uh... that get lucky song... i was kinda diggin that & i think im gonna go check some more
Next >>