As a Vermonter 'Writing my senator' meant Writing Sen. Leahy. Here is the reply I received. Thank you for contacting me about the use of body scanners in airports and new security screening procedures. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue, and understand your concerns.
After September 11, 2001, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) implemented a pilot program to test whole-body scanners in airports before they were put into widespread use. In October 2009, the TSA ordered 150 whole-body scanners to be deployed in airports across the nation, and in March 2010, the TSA purchased an additional 450 scanners that are currently being deployed nationwide. In the wake of this deployment, many Americans have expressed concerns over personal privacy as the whole-body scanners are used to screen passengers, and the security of those captured images.
On October 28, 2010, the TSA announced that it would begin to utilize new pat-down techniques at airport security checkpoints for persons who refuse to be screened by airport scanners, and for those who trigger the scanners while they are screened. I have seen news reports describing the pat-down searches and heard from numerous Vermonters who oppose such procedures. I am also troubled by these more stringent and invasive pat-downs, and believe that while the TSA must effectively ensure airline and passenger safety, it must not sacrifice our privacy.
I have also heard from Vermonters who are concerned over the potential radiation hazards that may be posed by widespread implementation of whole-body scanners. While the risks associated with radiation from these machines are said to be minute, I believe that we need to ensure that public health is not put in jeopardy with the deployment of any screening technology.
As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I intend to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security is held accountable for ensuring that we are successful in protecting both passenger safety and privacy. I believe that we can successfully accomplish this goal without sacrificing either. You can be sure that I will keep your thoughts in mind when the Judiciary Committee holds its next oversight hearing of the Department of Homeland Security and continue to closely monitor this issue.
It's not designed to keep outsiders at a disadvantage anymore then HTML is. 'Legalese' is nothing more than a coding launguage for human legal interactions. It has scripts, basic librarys, and commands. The only difference is legalese has been in use for an extremly long time. With few patches and minimal rewrites. The system needs an overhaul. Imagine if instead of doing away with it, people still used BASIC. Just adding more code for every new feature. Eventually you'd be looking at millions of lines of code, and you'd need an eight year degree to understand it.
Every programing launguage has life span, I don't know what would replace it, but a new Legal launguage needs to but created. (L++ maybe?)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but obvious ideas aren't suposed to be patentable.
From MS's blog post:
" Indeed, our patents relate to key features that users have come to expect from every smartphone. The ability to send and receive email on-the-go has driven smartphone adoption. Nowadays, everyone expects to receive e-mail from multiple services in real time, to read it on their phones, and to reply or send new messages out – in continuous and seamless synchronization with their email services. "
Common, expected from every smartphone, everyone... All words that, to me, impley that an adverage person in the field would think of these things.
With the rapid pace of change in the IT industry, maybe patent the apply to Software, and computing in general should have shorter life spans. Patents last 20 years. In tech terms that's 10-20 generations! By the time a patent expires the industry will have completely changed. I'm all for giving inventers a head start in the market, but this is like saying no one else could make gas cars without paying ford since 1890.
I believe that what Google and Verizon are trying to lay out is certain packets, like those for phone calls, should be prioritized over things SMS and data packets. This would be a simple way of dealing with the issues AT&T has been having with Iphone data crippling their network. As it stands, the cell network already prioritizes communications by emergency workers.
"When we do deviate from our normal practice, such as we did with the DROID, there is a specific business reason for doing so."
Oh! You mean that reason why people started saying the droid was better then the iPhone? The reason why people started looking at Motorola like they might become a contender again? That reason?
If your normal practice is losing market share, I'd think some deviation would be welcome.
I agree, the app store isn't a dumb pipe like say, youtube. With the amount of control they force, they should be liable. They review all apps for approval, they approved it, they are infringing as well.
They can already hack your car lock, it's just impractical to do so. 1-takes a few hours to do so. 2-it works once and the code resets. your car and key tell each other a new code each press of the button.
I'd disagree. UPS, Fedex, DHL, and even the USPS (though poorly) allow you to track a package. And really that's all delivery pizza is: A parcel bought to you by a delivery guy. The fact the they make the package (pizza) is irrelevant.
Right now I've got Batman: Arkham Asylum and Modern Warfare 2 preordered. They come with a batarang and night-vision goggles respectively. Metal cases and dvds are pretty lame too tell the truth.
On the post: Canadian TSA's Non-Apology Apology To 82-Year-Old Woman
Re: OHhhhh...
On the post: Canadian TSA's Non-Apology Apology To 82-Year-Old Woman
OHhhhh...
On the post: Patrick Leahy Says TSA Scanners Are Invasive; Will Investigate Them
Canned responces.
Thank you for contacting me about the use of body scanners in airports and new security screening procedures. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue, and understand your concerns.
After September 11, 2001, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) implemented a pilot program to test whole-body scanners in airports before they were put into widespread use. In October 2009, the TSA ordered 150 whole-body scanners to be deployed in airports across the nation, and in March 2010, the TSA purchased an additional 450 scanners that are currently being deployed nationwide. In the wake of this deployment, many Americans have expressed concerns over personal privacy as the whole-body scanners are used to screen passengers, and the security of those captured images.
On October 28, 2010, the TSA announced that it would begin to utilize new pat-down techniques at airport security checkpoints for persons who refuse to be screened by airport scanners, and for those who trigger the scanners while they are screened. I have seen news reports describing the pat-down searches and heard from numerous Vermonters who oppose such procedures. I am also troubled by these more stringent and invasive pat-downs, and believe that while the TSA must effectively ensure airline and passenger safety, it must not sacrifice our privacy.
I have also heard from Vermonters who are concerned over the potential radiation hazards that may be posed by widespread implementation of whole-body scanners. While the risks associated with radiation from these machines are said to be minute, I believe that we need to ensure that public health is not put in jeopardy with the deployment of any screening technology.
As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I intend to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security is held accountable for ensuring that we are successful in protecting both passenger safety and privacy. I believe that we can successfully accomplish this goal without sacrificing either. You can be sure that I will keep your thoughts in mind when the Judiciary Committee holds its next oversight hearing of the Department of Homeland Security and continue to closely monitor this issue.
On the post: Press Realizing That Treatment Of Bradley Manning Is Indefensible
Re: Re: It's On Purpose
On the post: Photographer Sues State Of Texas For Using Image From His Photograph On Auto Inspection Stickers
Hey!
On the post: If Even The Best Legal Minds Don't Read Boilerplate Contracts... Why Are They Considered Binding?
Re: Re: Boilerplate contracts
Every programing launguage has life span, I don't know what would replace it, but a new Legal launguage needs to but created. (L++ maybe?)
On the post: Microsoft Sues Motorola For Patent Infringement... Over Android
From MS's blog post:
" Indeed, our patents relate to key features that users have come to expect from every smartphone. The ability to send and receive email on-the-go has driven smartphone adoption. Nowadays, everyone expects to receive e-mail from multiple services in real time, to read it on their phones, and to reply or send new messages out – in continuous and seamless synchronization with their email services. "
Common, expected from every smartphone, everyone... All words that, to me, impley that an adverage person in the field would think of these things.
With the rapid pace of change in the IT industry, maybe patent the apply to Software, and computing in general should have shorter life spans. Patents last 20 years. In tech terms that's 10-20 generations! By the time a patent expires the industry will have completely changed. I'm all for giving inventers a head start in the market, but this is like saying no one else could make gas cars without paying ford since 1890.
On the post: Google And Verizon Announce... Um... Something That Appears To Mean Nothing
Logical tiers?
On the post: Motorola Does Openness Wrong; Bricks Your Droid X If You Tamper
Re:
On the post: Motorola Does Openness Wrong; Bricks Your Droid X If You Tamper
Logic
Oh! You mean that reason why people started saying the droid was better then the iPhone? The reason why people started looking at Motorola like they might become a contender again? That reason?
If your normal practice is losing market share, I'd think some deviation would be welcome.
On the post: Apple Sued For Copyright Infringement Because Third Party App Has Someone Else's Bird Sounds
Re:
On the post: Official Twilight T-Shirt Contest Won't Let You Use Anything From Twilight
winning Idea
"I wanted to enter a contest, but all I was legally allowed to make was this lousy T-shirt."
Actually, Tech dirt could make that.
On the post: Can We Please Put The 'Amateur Brain Surgeon' Strawman To Rest?
Re:
On the post: Ubisoft's Despised DRM Continues To Annoy, Fail
Re: Re: Re:
They can already hack your car lock, it's just impractical to do so. 1-takes a few hours to do so. 2-it works once and the code resets. your car and key tell each other a new code each press of the button.
On the post: Can You Patent Pretending To Let Customers Know Their Online Ordered Pizza Is In The Oven?
Re: I'll give them this...
On the post: Is Amazon Blocking Reviews Of Assassin's Creed Over DRM Issues? [Update]
Re: Re:
drm...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/UBI-Soft-Assassins-Creed-II/dp/B001TK3DO0/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top
On the post: EA Giving Out Reasons To Buy: Tries Deluxe Box Set Versions Of Games
Common
On the post: The Borderless Internet And Jurisdictional Disputes: A Growing Problem
International waters
Next >>