the part that gets me is the pre-emption of state laws (Muh STATE RIGHTS!, except when it works against me) while 4 states as far as i know so far are working FOR that.
Re: Re: This is the reason for the March through the institutions
I think it's more of "We are not going to facilitate speech that may very well lead to violence and/or death. As for the whole Right/Left leanings, you don't exactly hear about the extreme Left making full on Borg statements. In fact, I will start using phrases such as "You WILL be assimilated" and "Resistance is Futile" Each time someone makes a statement for mass deportations, walls, or general exclusions of ethnicities.
Re: "what they would like to do is use my pipes free"
if you had been bothered to pay attention, there is a long and well documented list of cases and history of ISP's being very anti-consumer/anti-competitive. Now YOU, are offering NO evidence to the contrary, all you are saying is what Mike has pointed out, "Trust us, we won't destroy NN even though we are fighting tooth and nail to have it repealed."
Imagine the outcry, if you will, when say AT&T suddenly charges EVERYONE on it's network an extra $20 to $30 a month just to access Fox News. Or that AT&T would purposely slow Fox News and zero rate CNN (if it goes through and as a hypothetical). Net Neutrality eliminates that. It (in theory) treats CNN the same as Fox as the same as Google, as the same as Apple, etc.
To think that ISP's WON'T do this, means you are blind to past activities of said ISP's, and you are highly delusional.
except carrying any cash at all equates to facilitating the purchase and transport of illegal drugs. So your $400 is civil forfeited. Have a nice day citizen.
On the post: Right On Cue, Marsha Blackburn Introduces A Fake Net Neutrality Bill To Make The FCC's Idiotic Decision Permanent
On the post: How The Muppets And A Font Choice Hurt The Star Trek / Dr. Seuss Mashup In Court
TLDR this article
we will also claim our tort.
You cannot use our Trek.
Without cutting us a big fat cheque.
You cannot claim Fair Use.
for our definition is very loose.
We have thrown money at our Judge.
On our claims, we will not budge.
We will continue to sue.
Even if it looks like a zoo.
We will have our money.
Because rhyming is our honey.
On the post: Would-Be Congressman Wants A Law Forcing Social Media Platforms To Keep All His Alt-Right Buddies Online
Re: Re: This is the reason for the March through the institutions
On the post: Would-Be Congressman Wants A Law Forcing Social Media Platforms To Keep All His Alt-Right Buddies Online
Or to put it another way, "We need to use fascism to defeat fascism!" wait, what?
On the post: Five Below, Trendy Retailer, Sues 10 Below, Ice Cream Seller, For Trademark Infringement
On the post: Comcast's Push For A Shitty New Net Neutrality Law Begins In Earnest
it gets better about those comments..
As Reddit usually does, it finds things that is... off. Case in Point
but to the topic of the Comcast Law, weren't we promised by Pai that this wasn't going to happen? Did Pai lie to us? the shock and horror!
On the post: Leaked E-mail Shows Even The FCC's Own CTO Thinks Gutting Net Neutrality Harms The Public
On the post: The Folks That Built The Internet Tell The FCC It Has No Idea How The Internet Works
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...
On the post: The Folks That Built The Internet Tell The FCC It Has No Idea How The Internet Works
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...
On the post: The Folks That Built The Internet Tell The FCC It Has No Idea How The Internet Works
Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...
On the post: The Free Market Argument For Net Neutrality
Re:
On the post: MPAA Wins: Australia To Carve Google And Facebook Out Of Its Expanded Safe Harbor Provisions
Re: Rights are for those who create, NOT leeches or "platforms".
These people would like a word with you
On the post: The FCC Tried To Hide Net Neutrality Complaints Against ISPs
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The FCC Tried To Hide Net Neutrality Complaints Against ISPs
Re: Re:
On the post: AT&T, Whose Ex-CEO Promised To Wreck Net Neutrality, Insists It Won't Do Anything To Net Neutrality
Re: "what they would like to do is use my pipes free"
if you had been bothered to pay attention, there is a long and well documented list of cases and history of ISP's being very anti-consumer/anti-competitive. Now YOU, are offering NO evidence to the contrary, all you are saying is what Mike has pointed out, "Trust us, we won't destroy NN even though we are fighting tooth and nail to have it repealed."
On the post: Home Security Company Says No One Linking To Its Website Is Allowed To Disparage It
On the post: After Attacking Random Hollywood Supporters Of Net Neutrality, Ajit Pai Attacks Internet Companies
On the post: As Net Neutrality Repeal Nears, Comcast's Promise To Avoid 'Paid Prioritization' Disappears
I hate to tell you I told you so
On the post: Mark Cuban Still Has Absolutely No Idea How Net Neutrality Works
To think that ISP's WON'T do this, means you are blind to past activities of said ISP's, and you are highly delusional.
On the post: Court Says Cop's Theft Of Evidence Shouldn't Have Any Effect On Man's 15-Year Drug Sentence
Re: Re: All Money is now arrestable based on this
Next >>