Arsenal FC used to be Royal Arsenal FC from 1886 to 1893, and Woolwich Arsenal FC until 1914, named after the Royal Arsenal at Woolwich that the original players were based at. The Royal Arsenal was in continuous use as some sort of ordnance base and arsenal since the late 17th Century right up until 1994.
Google should reroute any relevant links through Bing (and others) and see how long it takes them to get sued by the mad frogs. I'd like to see France cope with pissing off both Google and Microsoft...
How can "Twitter (or other company) employees should not recommend using the DMCA for (anti-)harrassment purposes, especially without warning the complainer their personal details will be forwarded" be biased?
I don't care if it's gamergate, bernie babes vs trumpettes, or someone slagging Cincinatti parents. That really isn't relevant to the carefully put main point of the story.
Did you know all blacks die? And some blacks die of disease! We can't criticise police brutality and murders of black people while disease stalks their ranks unhindered!
We are still referring to a specific instance of copyright, whether it exists or not, so the definite article is most definitely correct in at least some circumstances.
Besides, PETA's case is that there IS a copyright, and the monkey owns it, so until adjudicated against (or it drops its case), for the purposes of this case there is a putative copyright to be definite about.
Because dying is bad in the Stone age or the 35th Century. However, a law that is affected by and relates to technology does need to be updated over time or it will become irrelevant and/or stifling.
Besides, given some of the stupid legal representations I've seen, 'Thou shalt not kill" could theoretically be applied to any 'act' of 'killing', i.e. shooting 'someone' in Call of Duty...
Or you could imagine PETA deciding to go for the pro-vegan interpretation...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a complete asshole. But...
Foreign governments deciding they don't want to allow a potential rapist and rape-enabler is NOT censorship. It is protecting OUR citizens from a self-proclaimed psychopath. Or terrorist, by some of the US-sponsored definitions floating around.
On the post: Arsenal, The UK Football Club, Sues Arsenal Cider House, The Pittsburgh Bar, Because Of Course It Would
Re: Sue Arsenal for infringement
Just sayin'...
On the post: Here's The Truth: Shiva Ayyadurai Didn't Invent Email
Re: Re: Re: Re: heres the thing...
On the post: Urban Outfitters With A Surprising First Win In Navajo Trademark Dispute: Navajo Isn't Famous
Re: Re: Re: Famous Marks
On the post: Google To France: No You Don't Get To Censor The Global Internet
Re: Google, quit complaining and do something.
On the post: Google To France: No You Don't Get To Censor The Global Internet
Re: Re: Again, what about the other search sites
On the post: Fantastic: Now British Firms Are Getting In On The Bogus Website/Bogus DMCA Notice Scam
Forget
On the post: The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I don't care if it's gamergate, bernie babes vs trumpettes, or someone slagging Cincinatti parents. That really isn't relevant to the carefully put main point of the story.
On the post: Corporate Sovereignty Now So Toxic, For Once It Isn't Being Used Against Canada -- Yet
Re:
On the post: How A Treasury Terror List Is Preventing Americans With 'Scary' Names From Using Online Services
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The fatal flaw...
On the post: Rightscorp's Copyright Trolling Phone Script Tells Innocent People They Need To Give Their Computers To Police
Re: Re:
On the post: TVEyes Hit With Incredibly Restrictive Permanent Injunction By Court
Re: Re: Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
On the post: Police Union Boss: Quentin Tarantino Needs To Patch Up Cop-Citizen Relationships, Not Us
Re:
On the post: Monkey See, Monkey Sue... Defendants Ask Judge To Toss Out Ridiculous Monkey Copyright Lawsuit
Re:
Besides, PETA's case is that there IS a copyright, and the monkey owns it, so until adjudicated against (or it drops its case), for the purposes of this case there is a putative copyright to be definite about.
On the post: Germany Wants To Define A Snippet As Seven Words Or Less; Doing So Is Likely To Breach Berne Convention
Re: Re: Re: the Berne Convention
Besides, given some of the stupid legal representations I've seen, 'Thou shalt not kill" could theoretically be applied to any 'act' of 'killing', i.e. shooting 'someone' in Call of Duty...
Or you could imagine PETA deciding to go for the pro-vegan interpretation...
On the post: Germany Wants To Define A Snippet As Seven Words Or Less; Doing So Is Likely To Breach Berne Convention
Re: Re: ... and then what?
On the post: Think Tank Who Proposed SOPA Now Argues That US Should Encourage Countries To Censor The Pirate Bay
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Marc Randazza Emasculates Pick-Up Artist, Legal Counsel In Hilariously Brutal Response To A Bogus Takedown Demand
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a complete asshole. But...
On the post: Law Professor Pens Ridiculous, Nearly Fact-Free, Misleading Attack On The Most Important Law On The Internet
Re:
On the post: Familial DNA Searches May Make You Think Twice About Signing Up With Private Genetic Services
Re: Re: 1966
On the post: With Another Major Expansion, Google Fiber's Looking Less Like An Adorable Experiment And More Like A Disruptive Broadband Revolution
Re: Jumping the gun, aren't we?
Next >>