Re: Re: Re: A verdict against Google would not mean proactive monitoring
Again
"Piracy and theft are ok if you a media company like Viacom anyone else its wrong . Viacom wanted to buy You Tube why? Why would they to buy a company that was making some money and the potential to make millions but was doing so on the back of others?"
Also it doesn’t matter if it was one account or hundreds, one part of Viacom was hiding that fact they where uploading videos and making look like it wasn’t them. The other part was issuing DMCA takedowns of those video's, if Viacom can't police themselves why should Google be responsible?
Re: Re: A verdict against Google would not mean proactive monitoring
Piracy and theft are ok if you a media company like Viacom anyone else its wrong . Viacom wanted to buy You Tube why? Why would they to buy a company that was making some money and the potential to make millions but was doing so on the back of others?
Funny thing is when they were first starting out they left the LA hair band music scene and moved to SF to connect with what they believed was their core audience and built a strong following. They had great live shows and gave away their music(LP’s). There was a big bootleg scene of their live shows and that only made them bigger and built a strong bond between themselves and their fans. They blew it all going after Napster, they turned beloved awesome band to a bunch greedy frakers. The cherry on top for me was on the Some Kind of Monster documentary showing King Ass Hat Lars sipping on champagne while auctioning some art and making million of what he paid original. Then had had the nerve to rally against Napster saying the people were stealing food off his table.
Time to head to the supermarket, big box warehouse, and close out store and start looking into multi-package items with patents.
“but in some of the other cases, the difference is even more striking. As some have noted, with Solo cups lids, there are supposedly 21 billion (with a b) cup lids with the allegedly falsely marked patent out there, meaning that a ruling like the one in Forest Group, if applied to Solo, turns a $500 liability into a $10 trillion liability.”
When now have the plot for the next Austin Powers Movie, cue up the Dr. Evil pinky to lip and his laugh.
My exact thoughts on the subject as wrtitten by someone else. Heres the Links:http://consumerist.com/2010/02/publisher-if-you-can-afford-an-ebook-device-you-can-pay-more-fo r-ebooks.html
"Maybe a customer can pay more for a digital book, but why should he? Currently, nearly all the value of the ebook format comes from the device, not the publisher. Portability, frictionless purchasing experience, syncing across multiple registered devices--all of that is provided by the device and the retailer's back-end.
By contrast, here's what the publisher currently provides in an ebook edition: typos, no additional content over the print version, no cover art, perhaps no photographs or illustrations, and no custom formatting. Saddle that with DRM that deliberately interferes with the consumer's ability to preserve or make full use of his library, and you've got one pretty low-value digital offering from a publisher
"
"Connolly's, which did not return calls for comment, could face a $30,000 fine for skipping out on what would have been a $2,700 licensing fee, Candilora said"
All this over 2700.00, and they really don't know who the band was? How do they even know if it was Springsteen's version of the song or someone elses?
Someone needs to put a muzzle Cuban. Why are you finding it so difficult to believe that Cuban is talking trash in hopes of bumping up his own investments/ownership in companies. The majority of money he made was because of the Internet boom bubble?
“First, I have to say "you people" as you refer to them doesn't refer to me. I am not a movie or music producer, nor am I part of the MPAA, RIAA, or any of the (hated) *AAs.”
If it looks like a duck, walks like and a duck and quacks like a duck guess what. You are solely to blame for that.
On the post: Viacom's Real Intent? To Pretend The DMCA Requires Filtering
Re: Re: Re: A verdict against Google would not mean proactive monitoring
"Piracy and theft are ok if you a media company like Viacom anyone else its wrong . Viacom wanted to buy You Tube why? Why would they to buy a company that was making some money and the potential to make millions but was doing so on the back of others?"
Also it doesn’t matter if it was one account or hundreds, one part of Viacom was hiding that fact they where uploading videos and making look like it wasn’t them. The other part was issuing DMCA takedowns of those video's, if Viacom can't police themselves why should Google be responsible?
On the post: Viacom's Real Intent? To Pretend The DMCA Requires Filtering
Re: Re: A verdict against Google would not mean proactive monitoring
On the post: Viacom's Real Intent? To Pretend The DMCA Requires Filtering
Re: A verdict against Google would not mean proactive monitoring
On the post: This Is What A Patent Thicket Looks Like [Updated]
Re: Re: Missing?
On the post: This Is What A Patent Thicket Looks Like [Updated]
Re: Missing?
On the post: Metallica Sued Napster For This?
Re: Well...
Hmm so you don't want to do anything but try to collect and a check for doing what?
On the post: Metallica Sued Napster For This?
On the post: Will Bloom Energy Live Up To The Hype?
On the post: New Industry Springs Up Overnight: Filing Patent Marking Suits Over False Patent Claims
Time to head to the supermarket, big box warehouse, and close out store and start looking into multi-package items with patents.
“but in some of the other cases, the difference is even more striking. As some have noted, with Solo cups lids, there are supposedly 21 billion (with a b) cup lids with the allegedly falsely marked patent out there, meaning that a ruling like the one in Forest Group, if applied to Solo, turns a $500 liability into a $10 trillion liability.”
When now have the plot for the next Austin Powers Movie, cue up the Dr. Evil pinky to lip and his laugh.
On the post: How Hard Is It To Realize That One-Click Buying Doesn't Deserve A Patent?
On the post: Book Publishers Circulating 'Talking Points' To Counter Arguments That Ebook Prices Need To Go Lower
"Maybe a customer can pay more for a digital book, but why should he? Currently, nearly all the value of the ebook format comes from the device, not the publisher. Portability, frictionless purchasing experience, syncing across multiple registered devices--all of that is provided by the device and the retailer's back-end.
By contrast, here's what the publisher currently provides in an ebook edition: typos, no additional content over the print version, no cover art, perhaps no photographs or illustrations, and no custom formatting. Saddle that with DRM that deliberately interferes with the consumer's ability to preserve or make full use of his library, and you've got one pretty low-value digital offering from a publisher
"
On the post: Instead Of Suing Each Other Over Who Can Claim 'Most Reliable' Why Not Invest In Making A More Reliable Network?
On the post: Springsteen Pissed At ASCAP For Implying He Instigated Lawsuit Against Pub; Demands His Name Removed
Re:
All this over 2700.00, and they really don't know who the band was? How do they even know if it was Springsteen's version of the song or someone elses?
On the post: Springsteen Pissed At ASCAP For Implying He Instigated Lawsuit Against Pub; Demands His Name Removed
Re:
On the post: Springsteen Pissed At ASCAP For Implying He Instigated Lawsuit Against Pub; Demands His Name Removed
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2010/02/04/2010-02-04_the_boss_strikes_sour_note_with_m idtown_bar_and_sues_for_copyright_infringement_.html
On the post: JetBlue To Most Loyal Customers: We're Too Busy To Help You, Sorry
Re: Sabre
On the post: Mark Cuban Tells Newspapers To Pull Out Of Google... As He Invests In Competitors?
On the post: Will The Recording Industry Pay For ISP Monitoring In The UK?
Re: Re: proof it don't work
If it looks like a duck, walks like and a duck and quacks like a duck guess what. You are solely to blame for that.
On the post: Will The Recording Industry Pay For ISP Monitoring In The UK?
Re:
On the post: Yes, If You Don't Do Anything, You Shouldn't Expect People To Just Give You Money
Re: Re: RtB
Next >>