The judicial doctrines of qualified/absolute immunity are the bastard children of a justice system (and apathetic electorate) that allows judges to empower themselves beyond the Constitution in twisting and contorting the law for expediency.
Would you be speaking.... Common Law by any chance?
Letting Judges and Juries decide court cases has it's flaws, but overall it works better than the alternatives.
No business plan, failing to move forward, hemorrhaging cash. Kinda normal startup think.
But actually resetting passwords to lock out paying users seems like criminal fraud.
I'd like to think they had a real plan - co-op with the theaters to sell off empty seats cheaply or at a fixed cost. (Win Win!) That wasn't going to happen with the big movie corporations stonwalling them.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
I'm just trying to figure out if there is one SodCit here, or like five?
I mean, if they actually had a definition they'd be shouting it out. It's like they just want to stomp around getting angry that we are "against them" when they can't even state their position?
Gary" and Masnick hold, "common law" is the summed result of court decisions
What the actual fuck are you trying to say?
Common law is clearly defined. I neither hate it not love it. Not am I trying to make up some gibberish and hold other people to it.
Cabbage Law, on the other hand, is part of the nonsensical rantings of Blue Balls. Law that is too important to write down because everyone should know it?
They should have sought the donations before pursuing the suit so far, and conceded defeat when they couldn't find enough donors to fund defending the suit to the end.
No that would be a terrible policy. They should fight to do the right thing even it it lacks rich backers.
What they shouldn't do is pick fights around obviously bad decisions, and then keep upping the ante by doubling down when they loose.
Pirate Mike can't take criticism of his loony notions.
Hi! Please let us know if you spot any and all attacks on the high seas. This is serious business. Keeping pirates at bay is obviously very important to you too.
1) How can Corporations hold Copyrights if they have no rights?
2) If this site is so weak, why isn't Your site better?
3) Please point us to your definition of "Common Law" before we all die laughing?
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Rule of Man? Or Rule of Law?
The judicial doctrines of qualified/absolute immunity are the bastard children of a justice system (and apathetic electorate) that allows judges to empower themselves beyond the Constitution in twisting and contorting the law for expediency.
Would you be speaking.... Common Law by any chance?
Letting Judges and Juries decide court cases has it's flaws, but overall it works better than the alternatives.
On the post: The MoviePass Mess Has Finally Come To An End
Bad, or Criminal?
No business plan, failing to move forward, hemorrhaging cash. Kinda normal startup think.
But actually resetting passwords to lock out paying users seems like criminal fraud.
I'd like to think they had a real plan - co-op with the theaters to sell off empty seats cheaply or at a fixed cost. (Win Win!) That wasn't going to happen with the big movie corporations stonwalling them.
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
I'm just trying to figure out if there is one SodCit here, or like five?
I mean, if they actually had a definition they'd be shouting it out. It's like they just want to stomp around getting angry that we are "against them" when they can't even state their position?
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
You don't have to take anyone's word for it, or need a citation. Go ask anyone on the street if this is right.
I just asked you. You responded with nonsense, proving my point.
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
So, you can't even do a simple citation - but expect us to take your word for it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
In other words - You are making it all up. That's called "Headcannon" if you were writing Fanfic.
The Golden Rule is a good idea - not a law. Or cite otherwise.
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
So you can't actually cite?
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Troll supports common law!
Gary" and Masnick hold, "common law" is the summed result of court decisions
What the actual fuck are you trying to say?
Common law is clearly defined. I neither hate it not love it. Not am I trying to make up some gibberish and hold other people to it.
Cabbage Law, on the other hand, is part of the nonsensical rantings of Blue Balls. Law that is too important to write down because everyone should know it?
On the post: Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Previous Declaration That Cops Stealing Your Stuff Doesn't Violate The Constitution
Re: Troll supports common law!
You just stated, whether know / admit or not, the essence of common law.
What "Common Low" are you trying to describe? Please cite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
The body of law derived from judicial decisions of courts is what us speakers of English here int he States use as the actual definition.
If you want to assign your own imaginary made up terms, you need to define them first.
On the post: Rep. Ro Khanna To Introduce Bill To Study Impact Of FOSTA On Sex Workers
Re: Re: Re: Re: I can TROLL
Wow, maybe you should stop spamming just to prove how annoying you are?
All those posts - and nothing to say except you haven't left your parents basement, Blue Balls.
On the post: New Mexico City Starts Crowdfunding Effort To Pay For Its Stupid Defense Of Constitutional Violations
Re: Right and wrong
They should have sought the donations before pursuing the suit so far, and conceded defeat when they couldn't find enough donors to fund defending the suit to the end.
No that would be a terrible policy. They should fight to do the right thing even it it lacks rich backers.
What they shouldn't do is pick fights around obviously bad decisions, and then keep upping the ante by doubling down when they loose.
On the post: New Mexico City Starts Crowdfunding Effort To Pay For Its Stupid Defense Of Constitutional Violations
Re: No one has the "right" In God We Trust
Right, that is why we have protections under via the Constitution and Common Law so we don't need to take a poll on such things.
Thus your local government can't raise a giant crucifix on the courthouse and proclaim, "Only 46% of the people object, so it stays!"
On the post: New Mexico City Starts Crowdfunding Effort To Pay For Its Stupid Defense Of Constitutional Violations
Re: By the way, WHO else wants others to pay for their mistakes?
This is of course the all-American ACLU showing it's opposed to the entire Judeo-Christian entanglement.
FTFY. The Us is not a christian nation, numbnuts.
On the post: New Mexico City Starts Crowdfunding Effort To Pay For Its Stupid Defense Of Constitutional Violations
Re: Re: Re: Trolls!!
Blue Balls would stalk any of us at the drop of a hat. I'm sure he's building bombs to mail to TD HQ. He is obviously on governmental watchlists.
But his elite hacker skillz protect him with the TOR and the VPN!
On the post: Some Investors Are Fed Up With AT&T's Costly Obsession With Merger Mania
Re: Oh, boy. The Troll"
Hey, don't forget the TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH AND THEIR CORPORATIONS!
Don't forget the biggest corporate welfare of all - the GOVERNMENT granted monopoly of copyrights granted for 90 years to your beloved Corporations!
You love corporations so much Blue Balls. When are you going to marry AT&T?
On the post: New Mexico City Starts Crowdfunding Effort To Pay For Its Stupid Defense Of Constitutional Violations
One Simple Fix
All they needed to do was to let the Church of Satan and every other religion place their idolatry upon the lawn and it would have been good, right?
Hail Baphomet!!
https://thesatanictemple.com/blogs/the-satanic-temple-news/baphomet-arkansas-update
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: September 8th - 14th
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I am not Mike - I'm TIM. Haven't you been paying attention? :)
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: September 8th - 14th
Re:
Pirate Mike can't take criticism of his loony notions.
Hi! Please let us know if you spot any and all attacks on the high seas. This is serious business. Keeping pirates at bay is obviously very important to you too.
On the post: Denmark Releases 32 Prisoners Convicted Because Of Flawed Mobile Phone Tracking Data
Re:
Thus "Blue Balls."
On the post: Liverpool FC Fans Plan Protest Of Their Own Club Over Trademark Issue
Re: The US of A needs to trademark "FOOTBALL" to keep the
Are you conflating American Oblate Ball with proper Soccer?
Obviously you are a clueless wanker.
On the post: Ninth Circuit Reverses Course While Quoting Its Own Precedent Saying Otherwise; Says Section 230 Doesn't Cover Anti-Competitive Moderation
Re: Even troll holds
Oh Hi Blue Balls! Ready to answer today's quiz?
1) How can Corporations hold Copyrights if they have no rights?
2) If this site is so weak, why isn't Your site better?
3) Please point us to your definition of "Common Law" before we all die laughing?
Thanks!!
Next >>