What I don't understand is, if an ISP actually stands up to this guy and he follows through with his threats to falsely sue & drag the companies name through the mud; couldn't the ISPs then sue him, and the state of New York for slander then ask for damages as a result thereof?
The law dose provide a provision for false & damaging accusations.
I had an issue with trial membership one time. I got tired of getting the runaround so I sent the company a letter stating my request for cancellation. When I got charged the next month I contested the charges on my credit card sent them a dated copy of the letter I sent them and they promptly removed the charges from my bill.
The next month they tried to charge me again, I again contested the charges and they were removed, this time they issued me a new card.
A month later I received a call from this company. The guy said my account was past due and they were going to cancel my account . . .
I told him to F**k off, I had canceled the account, and hung up on them.
I refuse to use trial memberships for this reason.
"and can only do tests based on a physician's recommendation"
Dose this mean that all court ordered genetic testing is illegal in California, since those court orders come without a physician's recommendation? Is there a loophole that the California courts are using to circumvent this?
All in all it, dose seem stupid that I can't choose to get a genetic test with out the approval of a doctor; it's a test, not treatment.
I recently had to fix my neighbors computer, because it was infected with over 150 different spyware, adware, viruses and other such. So is adware still a problem? YES. Dose it need to be legislated, no. I fixed her computer & protected it with free software.
On the post: Dear Motorola: Instead Of Suing Competitors, Maybe Figure Out Why Employees Are Leaving
Re: Re: contracts
On the post: Hari Puttar vs. Harry Potter
Dark Tower
I mean come on, JK is making herself a joke.
On the post: China Realizes It Doesn't Need To Block All Of iTunes
Re:
On the post: We're Still Debating Whether Or Not Free WiFi Is Good For Business?
Re: Re: The Third Place
I love my town.
On the post: Boston Subway System Stops Defcon Talk; But Paints Security Target On Its Back
Re:
On the post: Boston Subway System Stops Defcon Talk; But Paints Security Target On Its Back
Re:
Um . . . All it would take would be a Google search, & a moderate level of intelligence to obtain the know-how.
"And then, the system will catch pirated cards in short order and deactivate them."
One time access is all a person needs too cause a large amount of damage.
In any case Boston authorities have never been the brightest; do we all remember the Aqua Team Hunger Force incident?
On the post: Andrew Cuomo's Blueprint For How Gov't Can Get ISPs To Censor Content
Slander
The law dose provide a provision for false & damaging accusations.
On the post: Why Is Illinois Only Concerned About Canceling Online Gaming Services?
Contest the Charges
The next month they tried to charge me again, I again contested the charges and they were removed, this time they issued me a new card.
A month later I received a call from this company. The guy said my account was past due and they were going to cancel my account . . .
I told him to F**k off, I had canceled the account, and hung up on them.
I refuse to use trial memberships for this reason.
On the post: Why Do You Need A Doctor's Note To Get A Genetic Test?
Law
Dose this mean that all court ordered genetic testing is illegal in California, since those court orders come without a physician's recommendation? Is there a loophole that the California courts are using to circumvent this?
All in all it, dose seem stupid that I can't choose to get a genetic test with out the approval of a doctor; it's a test, not treatment.
On the post: What If Sneaky Adware Died And No One Noticed?
BS
Next >>