Hari Puttar vs. Harry Potter

from the in-the-wizard-of-IP-law-suits dept

Tue, Aug 26th 2008 2:48pm — Mike Masnick

J.K. Rowling has been an aggressive user of intellectual property laws against anyone who she feels has done her wrong, and Warner Bros. studio, which owns the rights to the movies has been equally aggressive at times. The latest target, as sent in by a bunch of readers, is an Indian film by the name of Hari Puttar: A Comedy of Terrors, about a young Indian boy who gets left home alone. If anything, you almost have to wonder if the makers of the film purposely picked a bunch of recognizable themes. There is the name, which potentially plays on both Harry Potter and Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors (which, of course, is public domain). Then there's the story line, which seems similar to the Home Alone movies. So this film isn't copying Rowling's work, but the name certainly sounds like it could be.

The movie makers insist their Hari Puttar has nothing to do with Harry Potter. The storylines are entirely different. Hari is a popular Indian name and Puttar means "son" in Punjabi. Plus, when pronounced correctly, it doesn't even sound like Harry Potter. That doesn't mean that it wasn't done on purpose, of course. So, yes, I can understand where Warner is coming from, but that still doesn't necessarily make this a smart move. Leaving the movie as is doesn't take any money away from Rowling or Warner. If anything, all this effort is doing is providing a lot more free publicity for the Hari Puttar movie -- which may be exactly what the movie makers wanted.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: hari puttar, harry potter, india, trademark

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Beefcake, 26 Aug 2008 @ 2:54pm

Big Copyright
Of course, Comedy of Errors was Shakespeare. Good thing Disney hasn't figured out how to lock that one up or they'd be getting hit from both sides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
eleete, 26 Aug 2008 @ 3:02pm

Boundaries
Hopefully India sees the clear distinction between the two and tells Rowlings to take a hike.
"Hari, the lawsuit alleges, is too close to J.K.Rowling's Harry for comfort."
I think she enjoys quite enough comfort as it is.
She loves a good pissing contest like this, hopefully she ends up all wet ; )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ashwin, 26 Aug 2008 @ 3:35pm

Obnoxious
Of course, if this were the trend, then all the spoofs that keep getting made in Hollywood (Scary Movie, Meet the Spartans, etc...) which directly mock the originals would be in trouble. JK is getting obnoxious and too materialistic with her creations and might end up alienating a sect of people who have not read Harry Potter and were waiting for all the volumes to be out (and the crowd of tweens and teens to stop losing sleep and breath over it). Yeah, so I'm one. Wanna fight?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:06pm
  
  Re: Obnoxious
  long ago I started encouraging people not to buy her books. if they want to read them I suggest getting them from the library or borrow my copies, there are some excellent series that got their start as parody and rowling seems to go after anything that get close to being somewhat, kinda similar. heck, a lot of stuff in Harry Potter isn't exactly original.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bill, 26 Aug 2008 @ 3:49pm

all wet
JK Rowling is a greedy bitch.
I wonder if she'll cry to try and prove she's right this time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:02pm

Hari Puttar: The giblets of spice
Never underestimate an attempt for the rich to get richer. JK is pushing her fanbase away with all her greed. Like Hari Puttar has any influence on Harry Potter's fans anyway...

This is pathetic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:21pm

Really? Hairy Pooter? C'mon!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Petréa Mitchell, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:21pm

WB, not JKR
Once again, it's not J. K. Rowling going nuts with the lawsuits or threats thereof against movies which might vaguely resemble the Potter franchise, it's Warner Brothers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 26 Aug 2008 @ 7:35pm
  
  Re: WB, not JKR
  Ugh. Accidentally published an earlier version of the post. The final version made it clear that it was WB, but we had a glitch and the wrong post published. I've replaced it now. Sorry about that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:25pm

wasn't there a news post about harry potter being used in a different book much before JKR .... maybe they read her mind before she published her books and she should sue them too or maybe those poor folks should sue her for copyright infringement ...

besides shes too late ... as the article says ... hari is a very popular Indian name and being Indian and Punjabi .. I've actually used the words Hari Putar with my 13 year old son as a joke ... maybe i owe JKR some payments .. and i would have paid them too if i had not spent all my money on the stupid Hari Putar .... errrr...i mean Harry Potter .. books anyways ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:36pm

How Ironic
Rowling is an idiot to defend her properties so vigorously when this is always looming in the distance: http://www.realmuggles.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Esahc (profile), 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:38pm

Dark Tower
So is she going to sue Steven King for including Harry Potter references in the last three books of his Dark Tower series?

I mean come on, JK is making herself a joke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
snooptug, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:45pm

Anywhere there is money
Anywhere there is money to be made off of an obscure idea that someone might be pissed off (or getting pissed on, as eleete would say) there will be lawyers more than willing to find a similarly obscure court case to set against the plaintiff for injury of some kind. That is true in any country or part of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
asd, 26 Aug 2008 @ 4:54pm

More like
More like Harri ImJKRowlingAndNeedADustBusterForAllTheSandInMyVagina amirite?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2008 @ 10:06pm

while it may have been warner bros with the lawsuit, i'd have to believe jk rowling had something to do with it given toward her past precedents on suing anyone doin parody or tributes to the work, which i believe probably wasnt entirely hers. come on now i hardly believe you just think of this whole franchise on a train ride without inspiration from anywhere else. besides now the money is goin to recieve so much extra cash due to the "streisand effect" sp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2008 @ 5:04am

How can this not fall under fair use anyway? Hasn't WB ever gone down to the adult video store to see how many knockoffs of their movies are on the shelves? Geez, did anybody ever sue MAD Magazine for their movie parodies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2008 @ 6:38am

JK Rowling is the Theif
There is a movie from the 80s called Troll. It's about a boy named... Harry Potter Jr. that has to defeat a troll and other mythical creatures. It's being remade with Lindsey Lohan's sister. I wonder if Rowling will go after this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 27 Aug 2008 @ 8:58am

I'm still waiting for;

Hairy Putter and the Philosopher's Bone
Hairy Putter and the Chambermaid's Secrets
Hairy Putter and the Prisoner of Azka-Bondage
Hairy Putter and the Gonads of Fire
Hairy Putter and the Orders of Miss Phoenix
Hairy Putter and the Half-Bloodied Princess
Hairy Putter and the Breathy Swallows

Yes, I do need help. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2008 @ 9:57am
  
  Re: Rekul
  I think most of those already exist on various fan-fiction sites....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
waqas babar, 26 Sep 2008 @ 4:38am

India is one of the most copy-cat nations ever to exist in the world............... 87% of their films are a complete rip off from Hollywood ...... and 10% from cinema all around the world (irani , korean , etc ) only 3% are their orignal !

Finally Hollywood has come to its sense and sued the Indian photocopier( Bollywood ) !
leave alone the movies they blindly copy TV shows as well !

1.)Are you smarter than a fifth grader - copied to - kya aap panchwi pass se teez hain

2.)human tetris (Japanese) - copied to - hole in a wall

3.)for a long time there has been an indian show named shararat which was about magic ...... then disney makes a show named wizards of waverly place with salena gomez in it...... so the indians turn the whole sharat thing just like selena gomez's show ......

these are just simple examples i just gave in a minute .......actually there is a big long list of movies and Tv shows !!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]