Really, this is now pathetic... why would someone with little to no brain (guessing the latter) would stoop to this low to sue good charities all to protect a not-so-funny site? Really, this guy is making me sick knowing that he's going out of his way to sue these two charities.
... You know what? Maybe we got all of this wrong. Perhaps everything we know is wrong. Black is white, up is down and short is long. And everything we thought was so important doesn't matter... just forget the words and sing along. All we need to understand is everything we know is wrong!
(P.S: if I get a reply from this "Tara Carreon," just to let you know that I don't give a crap what you have to say. You can't justify that it's all right for your "husband" to sue these charities or any other pointless crap. Nothing you say will make me change my opinions about you or your "husband.")
With all of this digging happening, when will it be to when we sealed the hole on Carreon or he "accidentally" causes a cave-in on himself? I know a lot of people want to see this drag on for a bit (and I'm one of them), but I'm curious on when we'll see Carreon trapped himself underneath the ground he was trying to dig.
OK, I know that politicians aren't going to do crap about this but this is kinda picking at me when I was reading this: if what happened at Pearl Harbor was a surprised attack carried out by the Japanese, and in this day of age when these people are worrying about a "cyber" Pearl Harbor...
Then why aren't they defending themselves if an attack on this "cyber" Pearl Harbor is going to happen?
Seriously, if what happened at the real Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack, then proclaiming "cyber Pearl Harbor" kinda ruins that secrecy (that is if someone decides to go through with it). Again I know these people aren't going to do squat other than the regular "do something!" routine, but that just kinda bugs me about what happened to the read Pearl Harbor as opposed to this "cyber" Pear Harbor.
Uh, this is the Internet... he can swear as much as I could, if I wanted to. We can't all be as "intelligent" with our words as you, bob. Then again, people can use their swears in creative uses, so...
And I'm little? Compare to the size of the Internet, yes that's true. But from what I can remember, it takes one to start something, no matter how small they are. Yeah, don't see how size is a matter here...
... OK, so apparently I'm a vain, egotistical jerk that needs to have my work stolen for my own good. I'm sorry, but that's NOT0 true about me. Sure I may have an ego but at least I can control it. In fact, I would LOVE to have my work shown elsewhere because, since I'm not making any money off of it (at least for the time being), it'll bring me attention to my work, even if I know it's not linked back to me. If I see my work, then I'm happy to know that people like it, even if they are making fun of it.
Hey Mr. Carreon, this sort of thing happens a couple of times here on the Internet. People here like to make comments about your mother being "a sexual deviant" so it's not like it's nothing new here (though technically it's not YOUR mother). There's a little thing we call "trolling" and if you bait them, they will attack. Right now, you and FunnyJunk aren't in a good position to speak, especially when you're deciding to cancel a charity to both good causes. Really, that's not only pathetic, but really stupid for someone to suggest not allowing a creator to raise money for charity and then donate said money to the causes of his choice.
Welcome to the Internet, where trolls are abound and anything you say can (and might) start a flame wars. Choose your words carefully or get out.
What about ads? A good majority of those who used Mega had to deal with ads, no matter if they are paying for a service or not and what kind of service they have. You can't just say that Mega was making money on just uploading/downloading files (though I know you weren't...). Then to go along with what you're saying, if I were to see some advertisement for this real-world company and look into what they are offering, then discover what they were doing... there is that likelihood I would refuse their service and will have someone investigate it. Online? That's a different story.
... But then again, there is a difference between digital copies and physical copies.
Like one commenter posted above me, if there's "free, legit" sites out there, can you point one out to all of us? I'm actually curious about this.
Really? I value my work as much as my life, and if the site that I was using was seized and I can't get any of my legitimate files back, then it's likely I'll file some lawsuits to get those files back no matter what it takes.
Who said anything about "absolute" proof? I didn't say anything about "absolute," just something. It doesn't matter what it is, as long as it exists and you can use it to back up what you're saying.
And really do I care about the legality of things? For me, if I were to use any form of online storage, I could have the "hard" copy of it (i.e. the original file) stored on a personal storage media (be it CD, flash drive or external hard drive), and the "soft" copy will be in that storage service. Now, I lost all of my data and it's lucky that I remember what my ideas were, but I couldn't make a back-up of those important files for multiple reasons. If I did made some back-ups, I would have used an online source to store those files and I would have also used multiple flash drives to keep those files safe in case something were to happen to my online files like Mega.
Do I care when it comes to legality? No. Sure the Internet is a shady place and I can't trust everyone that I meet, but I got to follow what I believe in, not in what someone else tells me too. If I can find a free place to safely store my files and have the accessibility to get those files any time, any place, then I'm satisfy with that service. If I don't trust that service, then I will move on to the next place and see I could find a better deal. This sort of thing will not go away no matter how many people complain. There will be others that will use this service and it will continue to live.
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"ENGLISH, MOTHER(bleep) DO YOU SPEAK IT?"
On the post: Charles Carreon Sues Matthew Inman... And The Charities He's Raising Money For
... You know what? Maybe we got all of this wrong. Perhaps everything we know is wrong. Black is white, up is down and short is long. And everything we thought was so important doesn't matter... just forget the words and sing along. All we need to understand is everything we know is wrong!
(P.S: if I get a reply from this "Tara Carreon," just to let you know that I don't give a crap what you have to say. You can't justify that it's all right for your "husband" to sue these charities or any other pointless crap. Nothing you say will make me change my opinions about you or your "husband.")
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman
On the post: The Politicians Who Cried 'Cyber Pearl Harbor' Wolf
Then why aren't they defending themselves if an attack on this "cyber" Pearl Harbor is going to happen?
Seriously, if what happened at the real Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack, then proclaiming "cyber Pearl Harbor" kinda ruins that secrecy (that is if someone decides to go through with it). Again I know these people aren't going to do squat other than the regular "do something!" routine, but that just kinda bugs me about what happened to the read Pearl Harbor as opposed to this "cyber" Pear Harbor.
On the post: Funnyjunk Lawyer Being Mocked Mercilessly, Makes Things Worse By Trying To Shut Down The Oatmeal's Fundraiser
Re: Re: Re: What do you expect from the leeches?
And I'm little? Compare to the size of the Internet, yes that's true. But from what I can remember, it takes one to start something, no matter how small they are. Yeah, don't see how size is a matter here...
On the post: Funnyjunk Lawyer Being Mocked Mercilessly, Makes Things Worse By Trying To Shut Down The Oatmeal's Fundraiser
Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you expect from the leeches?
On the post: Funnyjunk Lawyer Being Mocked Mercilessly, Makes Things Worse By Trying To Shut Down The Oatmeal's Fundraiser
Re: oh quit reverse trolling
On the post: Funnyjunk Lawyer Being Mocked Mercilessly, Makes Things Worse By Trying To Shut Down The Oatmeal's Fundraiser
Re: Re: Re: What do you expect from the leeches?
And speaking of noodles, I'm getting hungry...
On the post: Funnyjunk Lawyer Being Mocked Mercilessly, Makes Things Worse By Trying To Shut Down The Oatmeal's Fundraiser
Welcome to the Internet, where trolls are abound and anything you say can (and might) start a flame wars. Choose your words carefully or get out.
On the post: Double Standards: EU Commissioner De Gucht Is 'Innocent Until Proven Guilty'; EU Citizens Are 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent'
Re: Re:
On the post: The DOJ's Truly Disgusting Argument For Denying A Megaupload User Access To His Legal Content
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
... But then again, there is a difference between digital copies and physical copies.
Like one commenter posted above me, if there's "free, legit" sites out there, can you point one out to all of us? I'm actually curious about this.
On the post: The DOJ's Truly Disgusting Argument For Denying A Megaupload User Access To His Legal Content
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Sorry, I have no pity for a troll.
On the post: The DOJ's Truly Disgusting Argument For Denying A Megaupload User Access To His Legal Content
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And really do I care about the legality of things? For me, if I were to use any form of online storage, I could have the "hard" copy of it (i.e. the original file) stored on a personal storage media (be it CD, flash drive or external hard drive), and the "soft" copy will be in that storage service. Now, I lost all of my data and it's lucky that I remember what my ideas were, but I couldn't make a back-up of those important files for multiple reasons. If I did made some back-ups, I would have used an online source to store those files and I would have also used multiple flash drives to keep those files safe in case something were to happen to my online files like Mega.
Do I care when it comes to legality? No. Sure the Internet is a shady place and I can't trust everyone that I meet, but I got to follow what I believe in, not in what someone else tells me too. If I can find a free place to safely store my files and have the accessibility to get those files any time, any place, then I'm satisfy with that service. If I don't trust that service, then I will move on to the next place and see I could find a better deal. This sort of thing will not go away no matter how many people complain. There will be others that will use this service and it will continue to live.
On the post: The DOJ's Truly Disgusting Argument For Denying A Megaupload User Access To His Legal Content
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Next >>