Actually it's what happens when one video service dominates the field. There should be a mass exodus away from Youtube because of their policies, but there are few places people can go and get their fanbase to follow them.
I don't think the nature of media is to glamorize. The nature of media is to report on interesting things. Glamorous and exciting things are interesting. They aren't glamorize by being reported on.
Re: Re: Live by the DMCA notice, get de-listed by the DMCA notice
Excempt MPAA companies aren't the only ones producing content. You would have to do this for any company that produces IP, and then you'd in effect be creating a permission only internet.
Never mind that Google isn't the internet, and takedowns aren't for links to content but to the content itself, which isn't controlled by Google.
Wow, talk about an old man yelling that things ain't done the way they used to be. Music's been a vital artform for 500 years, but I guess it's all going to come to an end in the next 20.
You're the one that said Bowie was keen to make copyright disappear, not me. I'm not keen for copyright to disappear, and neither was Bowie. He simply saw that copyright wouldn't jive well with the internet, and rather than try to fight technological progress, he predicted copyright would lose and decided to think of ways artists could sustain themselves without copyright.
But go ahead and make up your own reality with your petty insults.
1. He wasn't keen on having copyright disappear. He just saw that the internet would clash with copyright law, which it did.
2. Releasing your work as "public domain" is not the same as advocating an end of copyright (or reform of copyright law) because even though he was a leader, it wouldn't change the system. He might make a statement that way but nothing would be gained from it.
3. He could claim his work was "public domain" but legally there's no way to do that. All work is covered by copyright whether you want it to be or not. How long would that public domain status hold up 70 years after his death?
On the post: Key And Peele To Livestream 'Sports Commentary' During An 'Upcoming Sports Game' That They Can't Name
What's a peoduction?
On the post: Publicity Rights For A Photobombing Horse? Owner Demands Cut Of Photo Prize
Re: Re:
On the post: Pick A Side: Video Of Creepy Girls Singing To Donald Trump Taken Down Over Copyright On WWI Song
Re: How could it be copyrighted?
On the post: The Shittiness Of IP Law Has Taught The Public That Everything Is Stealing And Everyone Is Owed Something
Re: Re: Copyright law is racist?
On the post: The Shittiness Of IP Law Has Taught The Public That Everything Is Stealing And Everyone Is Owed Something
Re:
On the post: If You Use An Adblocker You Hate Free Speech, Says Internet Ads Guy
On the post: NY Times Files Ridiculous Copyright Lawsuit Over Book That Mocks NYT For Glamorizing War
Re: Glamor
On the post: The Academy Bullied CNN Into Including Trademark Icon For 'Oscars' On Its Crawl For Some Reason
On the post: The Academy Bullied CNN Into Including Trademark Icon For 'Oscars' On Its Crawl For Some Reason
Re:
On the post: South Carolina Politicians Propose Ridculous Plan To Register Journalists... To Make A Statement About Gun Control
On the post: Hollywood Helps Show Why DMCA Takedowns Are Dangerous, By Taking Down Links To MPAA's Search Engine
Re: Re: Live by the DMCA notice, get de-listed by the DMCA notice
Never mind that Google isn't the internet, and takedowns aren't for links to content but to the content itself, which isn't controlled by Google.
On the post: NBC Exec: Netflix Poses No Threat To Us, God Wants You To Watch Expensive, Legacy TV
On the post: Copyright Question: Does David Bowie Get The Copyright On Computer Generated Lyrics?
Re:
On the post: Copyright Question: Does David Bowie Get The Copyright On Computer Generated Lyrics?
On the post: Why Radio Stations Probably Couldn't Just Play David Bowie Music As A Tribute: Copyright Law Is Messed Up
Re: Re: Re:
But go ahead and make up your own reality with your petty insults.
On the post: Why Radio Stations Probably Couldn't Just Play David Bowie Music As A Tribute: Copyright Law Is Messed Up
Re:
On the post: Why Radio Stations Probably Couldn't Just Play David Bowie Music As A Tribute: Copyright Law Is Messed Up
Re:
2. Releasing your work as "public domain" is not the same as advocating an end of copyright (or reform of copyright law) because even though he was a leader, it wouldn't change the system. He might make a statement that way but nothing would be gained from it.
3. He could claim his work was "public domain" but legally there's no way to do that. All work is covered by copyright whether you want it to be or not. How long would that public domain status hold up 70 years after his death?
On the post: Why Radio Stations Probably Couldn't Just Play David Bowie Music As A Tribute: Copyright Law Is Messed Up
Re:
On the post: David Bowie Wasn't Just An Incredible Music Visionary, But An Internet & Business Model Visionary Too
Re: Re:
On the post: David Bowie Wasn't Just An Incredible Music Visionary, But An Internet & Business Model Visionary Too
Bye bye Bowie.
Next >>