An incident recently happened that surprised me concerning part of what this article talks about. I'm within 8 miles of the border of Oregon and this town is immediately across it...I actually heard this happen on my scanner last week:
Apparently, Oregon must have already subsumed law enforcement officers under the umbrella of protection of hate speech laws. Or this is another Heien v. North Carolina "reasonable mistake of law" privilege.
What I can't understand is how the Cato Institute, usually a very reasonable and logical bunch of guys (as think-tanky guys go at least), seems to be all for this crap.
I agree to a point, but I believe there's an element of incompetence involved. The fact they aren't motivated by anything to actually be efficient in areas that are 'PR'-related is the primary cause IMHO.
I heard on the street that you can make the cartridges last a lot longer by mixing baking soda and a small bit of water and then let the toner slurry evaporate spread in a film on your paper.
We know you're in the pocket of Ma Bell, Tim. What's AT&T lavishly gifting as payola upon you for this glowing article, 15GB of data for the price of 10GB a month? A basic smartphone with unlimited texting (up to 500/mo) for a measly $20? Or more likely a completely free-with-2 year-contract prototype of one of their mysterious hi-tech "Connected Wearables". Give this sham up, dude. Its obvious You'll dance to their tune gladly in the face of such gilded, naked bribery.
On the post: Egyptian TV News Uses Video Game Footage As Proof Of Russian Precision Strikes Against ISIL
On the post: Health Canada Threatens To Sue Doctor If He Reveals Whether Clinical Trials Data Shows A Drug Is Safe Or Effective
On the post: NJ Legislator Wants State's Cops To Be The New Beneficiaries Of Hate Crime/Bias Laws
http://www.eastoregonian.com/eo/local-news/20151005/milton-freewater-police-arrest-89-year-old- woman-for-hate-crime-more
Apparently, Oregon must have already subsumed law enforcement officers under the umbrella of protection of hate speech laws. Or this is another Heien v. North Carolina "reasonable mistake of law" privilege.
On the post: US, Australia & Canada Decide Screw Over Poor Nations Because Big Pharma's Not Happy With TPP
On the post: DailyDirt: Can't We Just Play Games For Fun?
On the post: Australian Government Warns That Alternative Rock, Teenage Rebellion Could Lead To Radicalization
On the post: NYPD Union Prez Patrick Lynch: Only Police Are Qualified To Judge The Actions Of Police
I see what you did there.
On the post: Getty Images Goes Copyright Trolling After A Meme Penguin
On the post: Windows 10 Reserves The Right To Block Pirated Games And 'Unauthorized' Hardware
On the post: James Clapper Says Intelligence Community Has 'Duty To Warn' Endangered People... Sort Of
On the post: Courts Aren't Buying Dispensary-Raiding Cops' 'Expectation Of Privacy' Arguments
On the post: Feds Keep Magically Finding Documents They Insisted Didn't Previously Exist
Re: Re:
On the post: Feds Keep Magically Finding Documents They Insisted Didn't Previously Exist
On the post: TSA At The Movies: Theater Chain Looks To Bring Security Theater To The Movie Theater
On the post: UK Orders Google To 'Forget' News Articles Discussing Previous Right To Be Forgotten Requests
On the post: Your Toner Is No Good Here: Region-Coding Ink Cartridges... For The Customers
On the post: DailyDirt: Space, The
FinalNext Frontier...On the post: New Leaks Confirm AT&T's Position As NSA's Favorite Telco 'Partner'
On the post: Sophos: If You'd Like A Copy Of Our Free AV Software, You'll Need To Prove You're Not A Terrorist
On the post: Universal Music's Anti-Piracy Ads Even Crazier Than You Can Imagine
Re: Re:
Next >>