I know it is probably outside of the scope of this kind of oath, but I think there should be more work done to encourage publication of results that did NOT show what the researchers/scientists set out to. Negative results are being swept under the rug and ignored. This is a problem that really seems like it should be addressed.
Comcast actually WAS throttling Netflix. This was proven when people tested with direct connections to Netflix and saw issues, then used a VPN (still on top of their Comcast connection) to access Netflix, and saw no issues at all.
That is the clearest indication of direct interference with traffic as far as I am concerned. Remember, VPN traffic is encrypted, so Comcast can't tell what the termination point is.
Please show me where the site committed an actual crime. I can't seem to find that anywhere.
Yes, the author brought up Whack-a-mole and used the term correctly and in-context. You however, did not. Even after I pointed this out to you, you STILL do not seem to understand the context involved.
Maybe you should go back to Sparkle Lanes and see if its your turn to roll your rock down the lane. I am not sure you are ready for another reading comprehension lesson.
On the post: The Open Science Peer Review Oath
Re: Re: What about negative results?
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/research-shows-no-link-between-video-game-violence/1100-6423385/
Thank you!
Maybe there IS hope for more of this.
On the post: The Open Science Peer Review Oath
What about negative results?
On the post: DailyDirt: Deadly Diseases Besides Ebola
Re: Just a FYI to everyone...
On the post: Spy(ware) Vs. Spy(ware): Indictments For One Creator, Law Enforcement Plaudits For The Other
Not that it matters all that much
Thought ComputerCOP was computers only, but it is listed as being able to: capture "cell phone images"?
Just thought I would check.
On the post: Conan Doyle Estate Asks Supreme Court To Put Sherlock Holmes Back Under Copyright
Minor typo?
Did you mean awarding maybe?
On the post: DailyDirt: Learning How To Teach Teachers
Re: GED
SO glad I was able to!
On the post: FCC Comment Page Buckles To Its Knees After John Oliver Asks Everyone To Comment
Re: Re: Misinformed jokes
That is the clearest indication of direct interference with traffic as far as I am concerned. Remember, VPN traffic is encrypted, so Comcast can't tell what the termination point is.
On the post: Hollywood Piles On: MPAA Sues Megupload, Even Though They Already Got The Feds To Kill It
Re: Re: Re: Yet another reason...
On the post: 5 Year Old Hacks Xbox Live; Thankfully DOJ Apparently Uninterested In Prosecuting Cute Kid Under CFAA
Re: NOT A HACK
On the post: California Cracking Down On Coding Bootcamps For Teaching Coding Without A License
Re:
On the post: DailyDirt: Windmills Of All Sizes
They are not windmills actually
I know this may seem pedantic, but wind mills are/were used to actually grind (or mill) wheat.
Turbines are used to generate electricity.
On the post: Dianne Feinstein Deploys All The 'Intelligence' Cliches In Op-Ed Defending Metadata Program
Typo/Wordo?
Is it really arrests that "have been thwarted"?
On the post: Congress' Members-Only Gym Deemed Essential, So It Remains Open During Government Shutdown
Re: Oh yeah take that!
On the post: What's Left Of Nokia Poised To Become A Giant Patent Troll
Obvious troll is obvious
On the post: Philippine Record Labels Get Government To Play Whac-A-Mole With Kickass Torrents
Re: Re: Re: anon coward
Yes, the author brought up Whack-a-mole and used the term correctly and in-context. You however, did not. Even after I pointed this out to you, you STILL do not seem to understand the context involved.
Maybe you should go back to Sparkle Lanes and see if its your turn to roll your rock down the lane. I am not sure you are ready for another reading comprehension lesson.
On the post: Philippine Record Labels Get Government To Play Whac-A-Mole With Kickass Torrents
Re: anon coward
Second, the Whack-a-mole references the stupid attempt to censor them via a single dns action.
It's interesting that you seem to equate all those actual crimes with a site that commits no crime at all.
Obvious shill is obvious.
On the post: Philippine Record Labels Get Government To Play Whac-A-Mole With Kickass Torrents
Perjury charges?
“irreparable damages” must be very loosely defined?
On the post: A New Hope: How Going Free To Play Brought Redemption To Star Wars MMO
This is obviously not a "years old" game, and in MMO terms, it is still fairly young.
On the post: Copyright Claims Lead To Removal Of Popular Pebble Watch Faces
One of the faces looked like this
I can't see how the hell that could be considered copyrightable.
On the post: So, What Didn't Enter The Public Domain This Week, That Should Have
Book links broken?
Is that a whoops maybe?
Next >>