Pattern? Like someone calling you out on your logo and you swiching it and basically not saying a thing?
Like calling sharers (that is me, I share) pirates and thiefs? Deliberately confusing theft and infrigement? Like LYING about not finding a single article "where he sided with the artist/author whose rights were being violated by infringers" (FTFY) when he has a whole page dedicated to help them adapt to reality of today (Step 2)?
If I could spell hypocrisy and irony with one word, it'd be your middle name.
yeah, it's all government fault - forget the fact that USA is not a democracy. I'd call it monetarian polycracy, but hey - it seems monetarian prefix could be added to any -cracy or -archy out there.
Strange - tablets and rounded corners existed since the 80s - existing tehnology? Also - isn't it the specific application/implementation you can patent but not the underlying tehnology/idea?
I understood Leigh in this manner:
If you imagine non-'scaled back' public domain - its growth would be significant compared to growth we've seen in a 'scaled back' version.
Goshdarnit, this eejit is making factual and smart answers. Screw that - I'm just going to answer other two replies and it's going to look as if I've replied to everyone.
I did the googling. I found a link or two... would you mind telling us of your sources ("google it, stoopid" is not a source)? Also could you do it without your favourite logical fallacy, ad hominem?
But inside you know you're wrong. Just believe me (that this is a pirate den and everybody except me and other trolls is Mikes puppet) I am a non-sociopath and I defamed Mike enough that he lost all credibility (since these freetards have an average iq of 100, this was an extremely easy task) and then I threw in some logical fallacies and voila - I won the internets favor. It's a good thing I'm not a sociopath.
On the post: Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter The Public Domain? The Data Says... No
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter The Public Domain? The Data Says... No
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm going to use this answer when some of you maximalists complain about piracy.
On the post: New Data Dump Shows Feds Massively Increased Spying On Who You're Talking To
Re: Re: Re:
Like calling sharers (that is me, I share) pirates and thiefs? Deliberately confusing theft and infrigement? Like LYING about not finding a single article "where he sided with the artist/author whose rights were being violated by infringers" (FTFY) when he has a whole page dedicated to help them adapt to reality of today (Step 2)?
If I could spell hypocrisy and irony with one word, it'd be your middle name.
On the post: US Military Classifies Wikileaks As 'Enemy Of The United States'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: US Military Classifies Wikileaks As 'Enemy Of The United States'
Re: Enemy of WHICH state?
correct me, if I'm wrong...
On the post: Google's Copyright Crackdown Punishes Author For Torrenting His Own Book
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Shockingly, Kickstarter Doesn't Work For Every Movie (Psst: Neither Does The Old System)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crazy
On the post: Hospital Tech Declines To Patent His Invention, As Saving Lives Is 'More Important Than Money'
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you imagine non-'scaled back' public domain - its growth would be significant compared to growth we've seen in a 'scaled back' version.
On the post: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Goshdarnit, this eejit is making factual and smart answers. Screw that - I'm just going to answer other two replies and it's going to look as if I've replied to everyone.
On the post: MPAA Sends Five Key Propaganda Points To Politicians
Re: Re:
.
.
.
...EVERYONE!!!...
On the post: Court: Fining Jammie Thomas $9,250 Per Song Infringed Motivates Creative Activity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No. You don't.
On the post: Court To Twitter: No Time For Appeal, Hand Over Info Or You're In Contempt
Re: Re: Re: Holiday spirit
Anonymous Coward, Sep 11th, 2012 @ 5:11pm
=)
On the post: FBI Denies That Hacked Apple Info Came From FBI
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: FBI Denies That Hacked Apple Info Came From FBI
Re: Re: Re: Re:
12000000 * 250 B = 3000000000 B
3000000000 B/1024 = 2929687,5 MB
2929687,5 MB/1024 = 2861,023 GB
2861,023 GB != 3 GB
It's not 3 TB but it definitely is at least 2.
On the post: Why Does Copyright Last 70 Years After Death... But Licenses Expire At Death?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Why Does Copyright Last 70 Years After Death... But Licenses Expire At Death?
Re: Re:
FTFY
Next >>