I don't think we need to prevent mergers and acquisitions as such, we need to prevent abusive monopolies and cartels. I call it the paradox of the free market, that you have to regulate it (make it less free) to keep it free, that is, to continue to allow market mechanisms to function correctly and competition to drive innovation and effectiveness, and also to have a wide field of contenders to grow diversity and allow creative cross-pollination..
I think especially with the regard to the latter aspect, current anti-trust legislation is not up to it's task. Theoretically, you can have two suppliers and maintain perfect competition, but this is falling short on the second aspect: especially with regard to media that is showing: it is unconvincing to have outlets with opposite political leanings to be owned by the same owner.
Solving this is will be tricky. My own thinking is that we should make it less attractive to be a monopolist: a kind of progressive tax on profits proportional to your market share, kicking in modestly when you reach 25%, and going to 100% when you reach 100% -- but defining markets is hard, and we do not want to destroy economies of scale.
I also think having a few brick walls between certain markets will be a good thing -- you cannot be active in one if you are active in the other: e.g. I would prohibit being both an insurer and a bank, a distribution channel and a publisher, or a sales platform and a shop, because such combinations have shown to be very liable to abuse.
Sounds like you're referring to some Christian fundamentalists' talking points:
"My right to be a bigot against gay people trumps your right not to be discriminated against and fire you for acts that harm nobody and take place outside office hours in the privacy of your own home."
"My right to be an idiot gives me the right to force doctors to provide false information on reproductive health to women in a medical emergency situation."
I host master files for many ebooks I produced for Project Gutenberg on GitHub (copyright expired, so that is no issue). Some of these use words that are pretty offensive to some people today. Filtering them out would be a falsification of history, so would force me to take those ebooks away from GitHub. Not seen a notice yet. Lets see where this ends.
I wonder, would they be able to host the code that checks for those words on GitHub, or would that be banned as well.
To prevent comment spam, I have a list of bad words on my personal website as well, but that is mostly filled with the names of luxury brands and certain medicines.
Not a game, but we at Project Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders are certainly getting our hands dirty on the works newly elevated to the Public Domain. Some of the obvious classics (such as The Great Gatsby) were already available outside the US, with our Australian friends, but plenty of works are now PD anywhere in the world for the first time. Help is always welcome!
Jeroen Hellingman (profile), 17 Dec 2020 @ 11:49pm
Re: Re:
I am aware of this, all I want to say is that in the face of totalitarian repression, which the US school system appears to be regressing into, a fall-back to the old ways of subterfuge is an option.
I wonder what these schools are thinking they teach. Teenagers are supposed to be somewhat rebellious: they need to break free from childhood and find their own place in society. They need to fuel the continuous renewal of new ideas and initiatives that keeps a society alive. If you try to block this, you're on a road to self-destruction.
The US shows all symptoms of a society living in deep fear, which is on itself evidence of it being a tyranny, far removed from being that hallmark of freedom it claims to be.
I never brought a phone to school. Maybe return to those days. I used a handwritten pocket diary, and memorized all phone numbers to use at home. Teachers could inspect that diary, but it would take more than a current technology is capable of to decode my handwriting. Foreign alphabets has been a crazy hobby of me, and it would confuse the hell out of them when writing Dutch in Devanagari... (नेदरलंद्स इस मक्कलक त लेज़न). I used this for a lot of private notes until an Indian co-worker forced me to change to some other script.
Musicians should try to get clauses in their contracts that forbid interfering with other licensee's works, including a stiff penalty, and an explicit note that sending a DMCA claim is understood to be such interfering.
People who license stuff from musicians should get a clause in their contract that indemnifies them from such DMCA claims related to their work, and makes them responsible for all related damages.
Both clauses together should protect both the musician and their customer against this type of fraud.
Well, unlike in the 18-somethings, we now have massive networks, digital storage facilities, and can create wonderful API's, so many of those 20th century objects can be resolved with a little bit of tech. Just a accessible registry for everyone -- maybe even finally even a sensible way of using block-chain if you want to decentralize it -- where people can register their works and related transactions.
Submit a proof of your work with an officially notarized stamp on it (of course digitally done), and all following related transactions, and you have the equivalent of a title-deed to a piece of copyrighted stuff. Of course people can steal work, and submit it as their own, but that should come out easily when things go to court and carry heavy repercussions.
My take is that minors are incapable of giving consent for such a search without prior permission from parents / guardians, in which case the search would be illegal to start with.
Jeroen Hellingman (profile), 14 Dec 2020 @ 12:18am
Can't we by-pass this nonsense. Many of the people who watch the stream will have the game, or may have the music. Find a way to tell the game which music is required to watch the stream (unique identifier plus time-stamp), and play it from a local resource if available. If by accident that unique identifier matches a content hash in a certain format (aka torrent magnet link), well, some people will understand the hint. Some programming required, but not that much it cannot be done over a weekend.
If this type of criminalizing actions which are more properly handled through civil courts is seen as a form of government subsidy, this will also be in violation of various trade agreements that forbid government subsidies, and thus open up the US to sanctions from other countries. I can imagine the French saying, hey the US entertainment industry is getting this subsidy, so we will impose another levy -- not that they care about subsidies or are great with copyright themselves (they aren't), but because it is yet another stick to hit the US with.
Under EU law that sounds very much like a modification required for interoperability, which is explicitly excluded from copyright restrictions and anti-reverse engineering rules. That is, Nintendo appears to be claiming rights they simply do not have.
Calling populists "faux-populists" is not necessary: populists are fake by definition: they are politicians who promise whatever the voters want to hear, even the impossible, and then don't deliver, except what costs them nothing.
I doubt a fixed line router is cheaper, especially if you consider wiring up your house with cat. 6 UTP cables and matching outlets in all rooms. Doing so, however, will solve wifi issues, and improve your network speed and ping times a lot.
If I had an evil mood, I might consider advising my neighbors to use this, so their wifi causes less interference with mine. Good for them, I am not evil.
My guess is that they want to ban refusing a job or a house when speaking the "wrong" accent. I agree with the principle, but doubt it will be very effective. If somebody doesn't like to rent out a house or provide a job to somebody because of the French equivalent of a Hill-Billy (or New York, or Texas) accent, and it is forbidden by law, they will think of some other reason to not rent it to them. In France, "wrong" accents most likely are those of North African immigrants, the equivalent of Ebonics in the US.
Reminds me, France still has to do something to compensate for the historical suppression of minority languages, such as Basque, Breton and Flemish, which wasn't subtle at all.
While at it, given his predilection to see his own name everywhere, he would also rename the country to Trumpiana, Trumpland, or even Trumpistan if he could.
If consumer organizations and telecom giants agree with Ajit Pai's FCC on something it most definitely is not controversial. I was of the impression they couldn't even agree on 1 + 1 = 2.
On the post: In The Rush To Strengthen Antitrust Law, We Could Kill Useful Mergers And Acquisitions
I don't think we need to prevent mergers and acquisitions as such, we need to prevent abusive monopolies and cartels. I call it the paradox of the free market, that you have to regulate it (make it less free) to keep it free, that is, to continue to allow market mechanisms to function correctly and competition to drive innovation and effectiveness, and also to have a wide field of contenders to grow diversity and allow creative cross-pollination..
I think especially with the regard to the latter aspect, current anti-trust legislation is not up to it's task. Theoretically, you can have two suppliers and maintain perfect competition, but this is falling short on the second aspect: especially with regard to media that is showing: it is unconvincing to have outlets with opposite political leanings to be owned by the same owner.
Solving this is will be tricky. My own thinking is that we should make it less attractive to be a monopolist: a kind of progressive tax on profits proportional to your market share, kicking in modestly when you reach 25%, and going to 100% when you reach 100% -- but defining markets is hard, and we do not want to destroy economies of scale.
I also think having a few brick walls between certain markets will be a good thing -- you cannot be active in one if you are active in the other: e.g. I would prohibit being both an insurer and a bank, a distribution channel and a publisher, or a sales platform and a shop, because such combinations have shown to be very liable to abuse.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: GitHub Attempts To Moderate Banned Words Contained In Hosted Repositories (2015)
Re: Re:
Defeats the purpose of wanting to share things, right?
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: GitHub Attempts To Moderate Banned Words Contained In Hosted Repositories (2015)
Re: Re:
Sounds like you're referring to some Christian fundamentalists' talking points:
"My right to be a bigot against gay people trumps your right not to be discriminated against and fire you for acts that harm nobody and take place outside office hours in the privacy of your own home."
"My right to be an idiot gives me the right to force doctors to provide false information on reproductive health to women in a medical emergency situation."
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: GitHub Attempts To Moderate Banned Words Contained In Hosted Repositories (2015)
I host master files for many ebooks I produced for Project Gutenberg on GitHub (copyright expired, so that is no issue). Some of these use words that are pretty offensive to some people today. Filtering them out would be a falsification of history, so would force me to take those ebooks away from GitHub. Not seen a notice yet. Lets see where this ends.
I wonder, would they be able to host the code that checks for those words on GitHub, or would that be banned as well.
To prevent comment spam, I have a list of bad words on my personal website as well, but that is mostly filled with the names of luxury brands and certain medicines.
On the post: Big Telecom Wants A Cookie For Pausing PAC Donations After Hoovering Up Billions In Trump Favors
Re:
With a generous serving of scorpion sauce...
On the post: Gaming Like It's 1925: The Public Domain Game Jam Has Begun!
Not a game, but we at Project Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders are certainly getting our hands dirty on the works newly elevated to the Public Domain. Some of the obvious classics (such as The Great Gatsby) were already available outside the US, with our Australian friends, but plenty of works are now PD anywhere in the world for the first time. Help is always welcome!
On the post: Schools Are Using Phone-Cracking Tech To Access The Contents Of Students' Devices
Re: Re:
I am aware of this, all I want to say is that in the face of totalitarian repression, which the US school system appears to be regressing into, a fall-back to the old ways of subterfuge is an option.
I wonder what these schools are thinking they teach. Teenagers are supposed to be somewhat rebellious: they need to break free from childhood and find their own place in society. They need to fuel the continuous renewal of new ideas and initiatives that keeps a society alive. If you try to block this, you're on a road to self-destruction.
The US shows all symptoms of a society living in deep fear, which is on itself evidence of it being a tyranny, far removed from being that hallmark of freedom it claims to be.
On the post: Schools Are Using Phone-Cracking Tech To Access The Contents Of Students' Devices
I never brought a phone to school. Maybe return to those days. I used a handwritten pocket diary, and memorized all phone numbers to use at home. Teachers could inspect that diary, but it would take more than a current technology is capable of to decode my handwriting. Foreign alphabets has been a crazy hobby of me, and it would confuse the hell out of them when writing Dutch in Devanagari... (नेदरलंद्स इस मक्कलक त लेज़न). I used this for a lot of private notes until an Indian co-worker forced me to change to some other script.
On the post: Copyright Trolling/SEO Scam, Changing The Photo Credits On Wikimedia Commons
Re:
Musicians should try to get clauses in their contracts that forbid interfering with other licensee's works, including a stiff penalty, and an explicit note that sending a DMCA claim is understood to be such interfering.
People who license stuff from musicians should get a clause in their contract that indemnifies them from such DMCA claims related to their work, and makes them responsible for all related damages.
Both clauses together should protect both the musician and their customer against this type of fraud.
On the post: Copyright Trolling/SEO Scam, Changing The Photo Credits On Wikimedia Commons
Re: Re:
Well, unlike in the 18-somethings, we now have massive networks, digital storage facilities, and can create wonderful API's, so many of those 20th century objects can be resolved with a little bit of tech. Just a accessible registry for everyone -- maybe even finally even a sensible way of using block-chain if you want to decentralize it -- where people can register their works and related transactions.
Submit a proof of your work with an officially notarized stamp on it (of course digitally done), and all following related transactions, and you have the equivalent of a title-deed to a piece of copyrighted stuff. Of course people can steal work, and submit it as their own, but that should come out easily when things go to court and carry heavy repercussions.
On the post: Schools Are Using Phone-Cracking Tech To Access The Contents Of Students' Devices
My take is that minors are incapable of giving consent for such a search without prior permission from parents / guardians, in which case the search would be illegal to start with.
On the post: Cyberpunk 2077's Stream-Safe Setting Option For Its Music Failed To Keep Streamers Safe
Can't we by-pass this nonsense. Many of the people who watch the stream will have the game, or may have the music. Find a way to tell the game which music is required to watch the stream (unique identifier plus time-stamp), and play it from a local resource if available. If by accident that unique identifier matches a content hash in a certain format (aka torrent magnet link), well, some people will understand the hint. Some programming required, but not that much it cannot be done over a weekend.
On the post: Tillis Release Details Of His Felony Streaming Bill; A Weird Gift To Hollywood At The Expense Of Taxpayers
If this type of criminalizing actions which are more properly handled through civil courts is seen as a form of government subsidy, this will also be in violation of various trade agreements that forbid government subsidies, and thus open up the US to sanctions from other countries. I can imagine the French saying, hey the US entertainment industry is getting this subsidy, so we will impose another levy -- not that they care about subsidies or are great with copyright themselves (they aren't), but because it is yet another stick to hit the US with.
On the post: Nintendo Plays 'Control Inception', Cancelling Splatoon Broadcast After Teams Protest Canceling Smash Bros. Tourney
Under EU law that sounds very much like a modification required for interoperability, which is explicitly excluded from copyright restrictions and anti-reverse engineering rules. That is, Nintendo appears to be claiming rights they simply do not have.
On the post: GOP Confirms Unqualified Simington to FCC With Eye On Crippling Biden FCC
Calling populists "faux-populists" is not necessary: populists are fake by definition: they are politicians who promise whatever the voters want to hear, even the impossible, and then don't deliver, except what costs them nothing.
On the post: Trump Makes It Official: He's Going To Pull Military Funding, Because Congress Won't Kill The Open Internet
Re: By all means, hand your opposition that knife
Republican voters haven't been known for their rationality recently, so they will probably get away with it.
On the post: Somehow, 5G Paranoia Is Only Getting Dumber
I doubt a fixed line router is cheaper, especially if you consider wiring up your house with cat. 6 UTP cables and matching outlets in all rooms. Doing so, however, will solve wifi issues, and improve your network speed and ping times a lot.
If I had an evil mood, I might consider advising my neighbors to use this, so their wifi causes less interference with mine. Good for them, I am not evil.
On the post: French Legislators Outlaw Discriminating Against People Because Of Their 'Regional Accents'
Re:
My guess is that they want to ban refusing a job or a house when speaking the "wrong" accent. I agree with the principle, but doubt it will be very effective. If somebody doesn't like to rent out a house or provide a job to somebody because of the French equivalent of a Hill-Billy (or New York, or Texas) accent, and it is forbidden by law, they will think of some other reason to not rent it to them. In France, "wrong" accents most likely are those of North African immigrants, the equivalent of Ebonics in the US.
Reminds me, France still has to do something to compensate for the historical suppression of minority languages, such as Basque, Breton and Flemish, which wasn't subtle at all.
On the post: Trump Promises To Defund The Entire Military, If Congress Won't Let Him Punish The Internet For Being Mean To Him
Re:
While at it, given his predilection to see his own name everywhere, he would also rename the country to Trumpiana, Trumpland, or even Trumpistan if he could.
On the post: Ajit Pai's FCC Does Something Good, Frees Wireless Spectrum The Auto Industry Had Done Little With
If consumer organizations and telecom giants agree with Ajit Pai's FCC on something it most definitely is not controversial. I was of the impression they couldn't even agree on 1 + 1 = 2.
Next >>