Re: Linking surely meets this test: "Rather, liability exists if the defendant engages in personal conduct that encourages or assists the infringement."
You're still behaving like you don't understand but you do, you do.
All these(you) asshats are doing is attempting to shoot(bill) the messenger(s) while aiming for safe harbors all on other peoples' dime and time.
If it's accessible on the networks and it's a problem for you then how about you track the source(s) down. We are not here to temper, filter, prevent or even understand why, how or from where an accessible address delivers its data from. If you claim to have a "claim" then that's your fucking job to provide a mechanism to handle your wares. And you suck at it.
You infamously lazy bastards are rats. Dirty rats.
As for the 'lympics? Yeah, OK, that sure is something special you got there. Yet more 20th century garbage shaped and channeled through gatekeepers and assholes with mind-numbingly shitty everything.
It'll be neat when all these IP whores become adults. Too bad we'll all be dead. Actually, it'll be neat when we're all dead.
Event list and a camera selection. Pony meet automobile, automobile pony. Hi. Hi.
Re: ICE is protecting domestic US of A territory against foreign invaders, so data from foreign countries such as about mass invasion plans or human trafficking could certainly be of use.
I think the operational hierarchy is Enforcers -> Suspects -> Victims
Re: The movie "Idiocracy" was wildly optimistic that will take 500 years to undo civilization.
.. and her ass was shaped like this ( hands, fingers, heart shape, shadow rabbits ) and I hit that in your driveway and your ma was like da-yaam! and I was like "yeah, like that". You want some, don't you? Yeah you do. Civilized folk, and all that.
They're referring to the content-side advertisements, those at the link destination aka where the content actually resides vs the advertisements that you do not see on google news.
I think I see. I understand the position but I think it is one mired in the failed (failing?) politics of acceptance, mere acceptance. At best a tentative acknowledgement. Enlightenment is a long, long way off. I think your position illustrates that perfectly but it's not like we're faced with a lack of other evidence either.
It looks like you've effectively colored (can I do that here?) your opinion based solely on what you can see, perhaps even through the foggy lens of your own privilege. There is some oblique dismissal on your part. I will posit (almost with absolute certainty) that any white child exposed to this society is a child with a leg up. A tiny leg, perhaps, in certain situations, locations or conditions, but a solid little step up nonetheless.
It's pretty easy and all too palatable to view the privilege of (vast) wealth, near and far, is it not? There is little in the way of subtlety there. The rich do not need to acknowledge the plight of the poor, do they? No, no they don't. Privilege, like power, is readily and easily abused and just as easily that abuse can simple be waved away, like a fly on your fruit pie.
I don't understand. Are you saying "black" should now be "any shade of brown"?
Or are you saying that being born (looking) white no longer comes with the privilege one would might expect from a mostly a white-bred, white-led society?
I think your prism is cracked. When born white there is a significant degree of privilege that that pure luck draw comes with.
So, if considering all of the things "It's okay to be black" actually, generally, carries quite a bit more weight than "It's okay to be white" where the latter, again, generally, seems like a very rare circumstance indeed. Unless you're just whistling for the dog, of course.
I really wish people would stop trying to equate services with infrastructure. Barring ignorance this "point of view" is only a refuge of idiots and thieves whose only purpose is to obfuscate, deceive and exert power and control over something that is not theirs.
The dickheads on the edge of land like to believe and behave as if they control the water.
Re: Be NO problem finding "blatantly, overwhelmingly or structurally" piratical.
Riight. So pay no attention to the absolutely blistering effects of policing piracy (rather, having everyone except you police it for you) on the medium.
Foolhardy idiots. Why make it better when you can just expend that energy on trying to fuck the world over again and again at every single corner of new tech?
You're god damn right I favor piracy over the means and methods of the current direction on these matters. Far and away. Your fucking shit is in tatters and, whelp, fuck the world, I'm keeping mine.
Don't you think it has slightly more to do with network access being controlled by far too few? Wherein the natural progression is to introduce a false scarcity for something that is not scarce? It's light and sound so ... caps and fast lanes.. naturally. ffs.
If the timing plays out then I suppose one could creatively argue that the prosecutor and judge are also guilty of manslaughter via exposing the detective to child porn which subsequently led to the abuse of children and, ultimately, his suicide.
On the post: Judge Dismisses Playboy's Dumb Copyright Lawsuit Against BoingBoing
Re: Linking surely meets this test: "Rather, liability exists if the defendant engages in personal conduct that encourages or assists the infringement."
All these(you) asshats are doing is attempting to shoot(bill) the messenger(s) while aiming for safe harbors all on other peoples' dime and time.
If it's accessible on the networks and it's a problem for you then how about you track the source(s) down. We are not here to temper, filter, prevent or even understand why, how or from where an accessible address delivers its data from. If you claim to have a "claim" then that's your fucking job to provide a mechanism to handle your wares. And you suck at it.
You infamously lazy bastards are rats. Dirty rats.
On the post: Twitter & Facebook Want You To Follow The Olympics... But Only If The IOC Gives Its Stamp Of Approval
As for the 'lympics? Yeah, OK, that sure is something special you got there. Yet more 20th century garbage shaped and channeled through gatekeepers and assholes with mind-numbingly shitty everything.
It'll be neat when all these IP whores become adults. Too bad we'll all be dead. Actually, it'll be neat when we're all dead.
Event list and a camera selection. Pony meet automobile, automobile pony. Hi. Hi.
On the post: ICE Wants To Be Yet Another Federal Agency With Access To Unminimized Surveillance
Re: ICE is protecting domestic US of A territory against foreign invaders, so data from foreign countries such as about mass invasion plans or human trafficking could certainly be of use.
I do not believe citizens factor in anywhere.
On the post: Appeals Court OKs F-Bombs For Federal Trademark Protection
Re: Re: Re: Re: Children
On the post: Appeals Court OKs F-Bombs For Federal Trademark Protection
Re: The movie "Idiocracy" was wildly optimistic that will take 500 years to undo civilization.
On the post: Appeals Court OKs F-Bombs For Federal Trademark Protection
Re:
On the post: No, The Death Of Net Neutrality Will Not Be Subtle
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yot, "just one part of a much larger vision": CORPORATISM.
It's a really fat pet troll.
Not to be confused with petrol, which keeps you going, this pet troll keeps rolling and usually downhill and usually really fast. No gas, just ass.
On the post: EU Commission Hid Yet Another Report That Showed Its Assumptions About Copyright Were Wrong
Re:
On the post: Once Again: Expecting Social Media Companies To Police 'Bad' Stuff Is A Bad Idea
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It looks like you've effectively colored (can I do that here?) your opinion based solely on what you can see, perhaps even through the foggy lens of your own privilege. There is some oblique dismissal on your part. I will posit (almost with absolute certainty) that any white child exposed to this society is a child with a leg up. A tiny leg, perhaps, in certain situations, locations or conditions, but a solid little step up nonetheless.
It's pretty easy and all too palatable to view the privilege of (vast) wealth, near and far, is it not? There is little in the way of subtlety there. The rich do not need to acknowledge the plight of the poor, do they? No, no they don't. Privilege, like power, is readily and easily abused and just as easily that abuse can simple be waved away, like a fly on your fruit pie.
On the post: Once Again: Expecting Social Media Companies To Police 'Bad' Stuff Is A Bad Idea
Re: Re: Re:
Or are you saying that being born (looking) white no longer comes with the privilege one would might expect from a mostly a white-bred, white-led society?
Or?...
On the post: Once Again: Expecting Social Media Companies To Police 'Bad' Stuff Is A Bad Idea
Re:
So, if considering all of the things "It's okay to be black" actually, generally, carries quite a bit more weight than "It's okay to be white" where the latter, again, generally, seems like a very rare circumstance indeed. Unless you're just whistling for the dog, of course.
On the post: Right On Cue, Marsha Blackburn Introduces A Fake Net Neutrality Bill To Make The FCC's Idiotic Decision Permanent
https://images1.dallasobserver.com/imager/u/original/8501618/cunt_mug.png
... so is that two points or just the one?
On the post: The Spy Coalition In Congress Rushes Through Plan To Keep The NSA Spying On Americans
Re: "General Mike Flynn's calls with Russians" were legal! Was lying to FBI that got him.
What we have here is theater all around. Both opinions, real or not, are of little consequence.
Cause of Death: United States Congress
On the post: DOJ Wants Protesters & Reporter Convicted For 'Hiding Behind The First Amendment'
Re:
On the post: Two Separate Studies Show That The Vast Majority Of People Who Said They Support Ajit Pai's Plan... Were Fake
On the post: It Was Twenty(-odd) Years Ago Today When The Internet Looked Much Different Than It Does Now
Re:
The dickheads on the edge of land like to believe and behave as if they control the water.
On the post: Canadian ISPs And Hollywood Agree On Plan To Make Themselves Judge, Jury and Website Executioner
Re: Be NO problem finding "blatantly, overwhelmingly or structurally" piratical.
Foolhardy idiots. Why make it better when you can just expend that energy on trying to fuck the world over again and again at every single corner of new tech?
You're god damn right I favor piracy over the means and methods of the current direction on these matters. Far and away. Your fucking shit is in tatters and, whelp, fuck the world, I'm keeping mine.
Nasty shit we've got going on, nasty shit.
On the post: FCC Boss Lies Again, Insists Net Neutrality Harms The Sick And Disabled
Re:
On the post: FCC Boss Lies Again, Insists Net Neutrality Harms The Sick And Disabled
Public servant my baby-soft ass.
On the post: Appeals Court: Forcing A Teen To Masturbate So Cops Can Take Pictures Is A Clear Violation Of Rights
Re:
Next >>