Copyright law should be fix such that a takedown request cannot be valid unless it can point to a source where the entire individual piece of work being claimed* may be purchased/licensed at fair market value.
no "some of copyrighted work used as piece of new original creation" scams. Takedowns only allowable for actual wholesale infringement.
Yeah no. The content Rogan creates is antivaxxers and Neonazis. You can't avoid that by not listening.
And it's not surprising to see the deliberate dishonesty of lying that it's just a trivial matter of "do not like / hate."
And your malicious lie that deplatforming (which, in the real world, is not silencing) leads to more exposure, when reality shows the opposite. Your motive is clear - your sole intent is to spread as much harm as possible.
Additionally, even if Rogan did break the law, Section 230 would still not be in play, as Rogan is not just a third-party publisher using Spotify as his platform; Spotify has a specific paid deal with Rogan to exclusively produce his lies there.
I'm reminded of these observations from the Splinters of our Discontent article:
One of the more striking features of the contemporary conservative movement is the extent to which it has been moving toward epistemic closure. Reality is defined by a multimedia array of interconnected and cross promoting conservative blogs, radio programs, magazines, and of course, Fox News. Whatever conflicts with that reality can be dismissed out of hand because it comes from the liberal media, and is therefore ipso facto not to be trusted. (How do you know they're liberal? Well, they disagree with the conservative media!) This epistemic closure can be a source of solidarity and energy, but it also renders the conservative media ecosystem fragile."
Network Propaganda's data regarding the right-wing media ecosystem—that it's insular, prefers confirmation of identity and loyalty rather than self-correction, demonizes perceived opponents, and resists disconfirmation of its favored narratives—map well to social-science political-communication theorists Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Joseph Capella's 2008 book, Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh And The Rise Of Conservative Media. In that book, Jamieson and Capella outlined how, as they put it, "these conservative media create a self-protective enclave hospitable to conservative beliefs." As a consequence, they write:
"[t]his safe haven reinforces conservative values and dispositions, holds Republican candidates and leaders accountable to conservative ideals, tightens their audience's ties to the Republican Party, and distances listeners, readers, and viewers from 'liberals," in general, and Democrats, in particular. It also enwraps them in a world in which facts supportive of Democratic claims are contested and those consistent with conservative ones championed."
We also see this in any bot spouting off that MSNBCNN or WaPo can't be trusted for no other reason than projection and other baseless accusations from the extreme Right.
In the Warhammer 40,000 the Golden Throne requires 1000 human sacrifices a day; this is supposed to seem inhumanly monstrous. Today we're sacrificing over 1000 humans a day to keep the gears of capitalism churning and no one bats an eye.
On the post: UK Government Refreshes Its Terrible 'Online Safety Bill,' Adds Even More Content For Platforms To Police
Re:
[Jhon Smith defamatorily hallucinates conspiracies not in facts]
On the post: Georgia Sees Florida & Texas Social Media Laws Go Down In 1st Amendment Flames And Decides... 'Hey, We Should Do That Too'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Common Carrier Interchangeable Services
And the number of comments in which Chozen demonstrates the slightest bit of literacy on law remains solidly at zero.
On the post: GilvaSunner YouTube Channel Shuts Down Due To Copyright Strikes From Nintendo; Pokemon Releases Music
Copyright isn't about creation, it's about control.
On the post: Nintendo Hates You: More DMCA Takedowns Of YouTube Videos Of Game Music Despite No Legit Alternative
Copyright law should be fix such that a takedown request cannot be valid unless it can point to a source where the entire individual piece of work being claimed* may be purchased/licensed at fair market value.
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Re: Disallowed
"These individuals" go by the username of "Koby"
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Re: Re: Re:
Deliberate fraudulent claims are the furthest thing from "disagrees with opinion."
Though it's not like you've ever once been honest here.
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Re: Re: Re:
What made you imagine your gaslighting about posts that are still completely visible in their entirety would be a winning tactic?
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Re: Re: Disallowed
Notice how nothing even remotely similar to TheComputerGuy's hallucinations resemble anything in the real world.
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Re:
Yeah no. The content Rogan creates is antivaxxers and Neonazis. You can't avoid that by not listening.
And it's not surprising to see the deliberate dishonesty of lying that it's just a trivial matter of "do not like / hate."
And your malicious lie that deplatforming (which, in the real world, is not silencing) leads to more exposure, when reality shows the opposite. Your motive is clear - your sole intent is to spread as much harm as possible.
On the post: Explainer: The Whole Spotify / Joe Rogan Thing Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Section 230
Additionally, even if Rogan did break the law, Section 230 would still not be in play, as Rogan is not just a third-party publisher using Spotify as his platform; Spotify has a specific paid deal with Rogan to exclusively produce his lies there.
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The only "point" you've ever made is your hereditary dementia is well advanced.
On the post: Hollywood, Media, And Telecom Giants Are Clearly Terrified Gigi Sohn Will Do Her Job At The FCC
Re:
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Liars like Lostinlodos oppose Free Speech in favor of Free Reach.
On the post: Wireless Industry Now Claims 5G Will Miraculously Help Fix Climate Change
5G likely to mess with weather forecasts, but FCC auctions spectrum anyway
FCC auctions 24GHz spectrum despite likely interference with weather satellites.
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Translated from Lostian to reality]
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
If you haven't yet deigned to join us in literacy, there's nothing more we can do to help you to understand Paul's rational plain English.
On the post: OAN Throws A Hissy Fit After Being Axed By AT&T, DirecTV
Re: Re: Re:
I'm reminded of these observations from the Splinters of our Discontent article:
We also see this in any bot spouting off that MSNBCNN or WaPo can't be trusted for no other reason than projection and other baseless accusations from the extreme Right.
On the post: Georgia Sees Florida & Texas Social Media Laws Go Down In 1st Amendment Flames And Decides... 'Hey, We Should Do That Too'
Re: Re:
--r/antiwork
On the post: Georgia Sees Florida & Texas Social Media Laws Go Down In 1st Amendment Flames And Decides... 'Hey, We Should Do That Too'
Re: Re: Re: Non Interference
Your willful blindness is no excuse for your lies.
Next >>