The difference is that Paris knew the video was being taken. I don't know/care whether or not she likes the fact that it got leaked, but, again, she knew about it.
Some typical tactics of people who are adamant that the only correct path is the one they want, and there is NO OTHER option.
1) "If what Shepard Fairey did was fair use, then it would destroy the AP, thus it can't be fair use."
That's called circular logic. In other words "If it's true, then I'm wrong. I'm not wrong, therefore it's not true." You can't use a DESIRED outcome as proof of that outcome.
2)"unless you are so anti-copyright that you are attempting to create outrage"
hmmm accusing someone of creating outrage by using inflammatory language. Inflammatory language is ONLY used when someone wants to create outrage. This tactic is nothing more than re-direction: "I don't want you to pay attention to what I'm doing wrong, so I'm going to call attention to something that you're doing even worse; even though it's completely unrelated to the issue at hand."
Please, people, if you want to have a debate over an issue about which you have strong feelings, do so; but at least come to the debate with logical arguments, and leave the name-calling and finger-pointing at home.
Well, you still have to give the guy kudos for proactively trying to make the general public dislike his competition. At least he's not suing anyone (yet).
Apparently, the main problem with most constructive comments on this site is that when you read them, you have a f****ing clue what the person is talking about.
That is true if you define content as "something".
The statement that is in contention here, however, is not simply the word content defined as "something", it is regarding the "content industries" which are things like movies, TV, music, etc.
therefore, if I email a friend (using web-based email), there is "something" in that email, however, while that email is a communication, it has nothing to do with a content INDUSTRY.
That's new: a troll that unintentionally contributes to the conversation.
I don't think that there is an entire industry built around blogging yet, but there are absolutely several websites which make all of their money from bloggers.
I absolutely REFUSE, when reading for pleasure, to read a book off of a computer screen; unless, of course, there is no other way.
Even after the advent of LCD screens and doing away with typical CRT screens, I get a headache if I read from a monitor for too long. Besides, I don't want to have to curl up in a comfy chair with my laptop; somehow it's just not the same as a book.
Newspapers, on the other hand, ARE good for something: packing material.
On the post: Only ISP In Town Pulling Plug On Suspected File Sharers With No Recourse [Update]
Re: What are you talking about?
Dude, China is a communist country. On that fact, alone, your argument is completely bunk!
On the post: Great Moments In Marketing: Disney Pulls Movie Trailer Off YouTube For Copyright Claims
Re:
........
......
.........
..........
........
Rocks are smarter...
On the post: What Good Does It Do Anyone To Patent Video Game Features?
Re:
On a side note, EVERYONE who has lived in Modesto, CA for any length of time absolutely despises George Lucas -- even if they do like Star Wars.
On the post: What Good Does It Do Anyone To Patent Video Game Features?
Re: We, as a society
Either you're being a cynical bastard, or there's something wrong with you. Either way, welcome to the party, man!
On the post: What Good Does It Do Anyone To Patent Video Game Features?
Re:
BullJustin said it best. "Money...."
On the post: Is It A Crime To Watch The Naked Erin Andrews Video? No, But It Makes You A Total Jerk
Re:
On the post: Is It A Crime To Watch The Naked Erin Andrews Video? No, But It Makes You A Total Jerk
Re: Naked...
You can DO that???
On the post: Is It A Crime To Watch The Naked Erin Andrews Video? No, But It Makes You A Total Jerk
Re: Re: Any minute now...
Erin Andrews did not.
On the post: By The AP's Own Logic, The AP Ripped Off Obama
Typical....
1) "If what Shepard Fairey did was fair use, then it would destroy the AP, thus it can't be fair use."
That's called circular logic. In other words "If it's true, then I'm wrong. I'm not wrong, therefore it's not true." You can't use a DESIRED outcome as proof of that outcome.
2)"unless you are so anti-copyright that you are attempting to create outrage"
hmmm accusing someone of creating outrage by using inflammatory language. Inflammatory language is ONLY used when someone wants to create outrage. This tactic is nothing more than re-direction: "I don't want you to pay attention to what I'm doing wrong, so I'm going to call attention to something that you're doing even worse; even though it's completely unrelated to the issue at hand."
Please, people, if you want to have a debate over an issue about which you have strong feelings, do so; but at least come to the debate with logical arguments, and leave the name-calling and finger-pointing at home.
On the post: Will France's Three Strikes Law Also Allow Gov't Email Surveillance?
Re: WTF?
Ya kinda hit the nail on the head there, bro.
On the post: Forget Clickthrough EULAs; Are There Really Walkby EULAs For NYC Parks?
Re: What if you're illiterate?
On the post: Forget Clickthrough EULAs; Are There Really Walkby EULAs For NYC Parks?
Re:
On the post: Forget Clickthrough EULAs; Are There Really Walkby EULAs For NYC Parks?
Re: Re:
On the post: Is The Connected World Killing Predictive Modeling?
Kudos
On the post: Can Print Be The Next Vinyl?
Re: Yeah.....
On the post: This Is Wrong: 'Without The Content Industries, The Internet Would Be Empty'
Re: Re:
That is true if you define content as "something".
The statement that is in contention here, however, is not simply the word content defined as "something", it is regarding the "content industries" which are things like movies, TV, music, etc.
therefore, if I email a friend (using web-based email), there is "something" in that email, however, while that email is a communication, it has nothing to do with a content INDUSTRY.
On the post: This Is Wrong: 'Without The Content Industries, The Internet Would Be Empty'
Re: Re: Re: But....
You see, when I said "That's a separate, though related, issue." I combined two ideas into the same sentence, in a grammatically correct fashion.
Idea 1)That's a separate issue.
+
Idea 2)That's a related issue.
=
That's a separate, though related, issue.
On the post: This Is Wrong: 'Without The Content Industries, The Internet Would Be Empty'
Re: Re: Re:
I don't think that there is an entire industry built around blogging yet, but there are absolutely several websites which make all of their money from bloggers.
Hmmm.
On the post: Can Print Be The Next Vinyl?
Re: Re:
On the post: Can Print Be The Next Vinyl?
Books n' stuff
Even after the advent of LCD screens and doing away with typical CRT screens, I get a headache if I read from a monitor for too long. Besides, I don't want to have to curl up in a comfy chair with my laptop; somehow it's just not the same as a book.
Newspapers, on the other hand, ARE good for something: packing material.
Next >>