Apparently they say, "Don't be mean to those skinheads, that may be early pattern balding! Just because they have a swastika tattoo doesn't mean they aren't Very Fine People!! And they person they are kicking probably deserved it anyway."
Net Neutrality and CDA 230 are the keys to an open, working internet. Anyone that wants them struck down should be looked at with a good deal of suspicion. Pretty much any close examination shows they are trying to take power away from people and giving it to corporations so they can sell it back.
People might not have hair for a lot of reasons, for example.
Wow, way to toss the strawmen under the buss crybaby. Nothing wrong with being bald. You you do want to lie down with the white supremacists and that really isn't something worth debating.
But you missed the point - everyone has their opinion. No site is without bias. You want to take away Twitter's right to moderate but love sucking up to StormFront to "debate" the best way to stop the minorities from stealing their women.
I really think it's missing the point if we try to point out the lack of bias. The trolls feel persecuted and no one will ever change their mind.
More to the point - if companies have a liberal bias - so fucking what? So they believe in inclusion and healthcare. So what is the problem? You aren't going to regulate Gab, so why does Twitter need the government to step in to protect the Proud Boys? Asshole's bragging about "Scientifical Facts" on Reddit to "prove" their white-power viewpoints get downvoted. What is actually stopping the skinheads and assholes from voicing their opinion?
So anyone anti-skinhead is obviously hostile to the KKK, Proud Boys, Neo-Nazi's and all the other Very Fine Trump supporters.
Therefore, proof of bias! Quasi-State!! Respect my anecdotal account!!!
Seriously anyone that keeps repeating this "Liberal Bias" theory needs to re-evaluate their talking points. Like it or not, online services have ToS that often leads to the ban hammer falling on skinheads. (As well as swatting random targets, because automatic filters suck.)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: crybaby hamilton does have a bit of a ring t
Crybaby Blue Balls wants to be recognized, but doesn't want anyone to be able to automatically find his old posts.
Look at how he has downloaded (and counted!) all my posts so he can stay up late and pour over them and count how many times I've called him "Corn Fed Wanker" or "Midwest Neo Nazi."
Since he changes his names, it is easy for a human to spot, not so easy for a computer.
Jhn Smith (The very fine scam artist) is a grifter plain and simple - he doesn't want to get pinned down. If he actually had a legitimate book business he'd be shoving his links in our face every post. Since he is using TOR he feels liberated and can make rape threats, cry about police charges, and then go home and fuck his goats without worry.
Reading the suit now. They say Github violated state law, CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 1798.85
Plaintiff Zielicke individually and on behalf of the California Subclass, repeats and alleges all paragraphs above, as if fully alleged herein.
Plaintiff Zielicke alleges this claim individually and on behalf of the California Subclass.
The California Civil Code § 1798.85 provides, inter alia, that an entity may not “[p]ublicly post or publicly display in any manner an individual’s social security number.”
The statute defines “publicly post” or “publicly display” as “intentionally communicate
or otherwise make available to the general public.”
By engaging in the conduct alleged herein and/or by failing to act as alleged herein, GitHub has publicly posted or publicly displayed Plaintiff Zielicke’s and the California Subclass members’ Social Security numbers within the meaning of the statute.
As a direct and proximate result of GitHub’s having publicly posted or publicly displayed this Personal Information, Plaintiff Zielicke and the California Subclass members sustained actual losses and damages as described herein, and will continue to suffer damages for, potentially, years to come.
Some nice points:
They claim that GitHub failed up uphold their own terms of service. The TOS in question? "GitHub reserves the right to remove anyone at any time for any reason." So since GitHub has failed to remove Everyone, they haven't upheld their own TOS. Sounds legit!
Claims GitHub should have notified everyone involved about the breach. Clearly spurious - it wasn't a breach of GitHub data/users.
Claims GitHUb should have just plain known that the data was there. Also, clearly silly.
Super silly - claims GitHub is in violation of Federal law regarding safe storage of personal data. Again, not their data!
Oh - violation of federal Wiretap laws! I guess "Throw all the charges at the wall, see what sticks" is what they are going for.
According tot he article, GitHub obeyed that law and promptly removed it when informed.
They are suing for preemptive censoring of all GitHub data. Upload filters.
Well you did get one point correct Hammy. Congrats!
Your posts are shit and you are a crybaby. If you don't like the TD moderation system, feel free to make a super-duper blog with clear rules that prevent people form calling you a shithead. :)
Re: How dare Github allow numeric digits to be used in code!
You laugh but that is the end-game for those crying about 230 protection. End all user content because it might be libelous, or copyrighted, or offensive.
What kind of society thrives in darkness and secrecy?
There is a secret society of dimwits that come here to post their praise of copyright when they aren't writing self-help books. They post anonymously and off topic. Hmmmm.
Journalist is not a licensed or regulated profession like carpentry or medicine. The state does not give (nor can it revoke) your license as a journalist.
Heya Blue Balls - Neutral would be charging for the data you use. This is charging different rates for "different" data. There I answered your stupid question - so mine is "What do you support - civil rights, or copy rights?" I'll wait.
You can only copyright a particular expression of dying.
That was once true, but due to the "Blurred Lines" ruling (as seen applied in more suits since) the "style" is now part of copyright and can be applied in overly broad ways.
You didn't post a multi-factored question, you asked why aren't people blaming the sun for climate change, and why are you all listening to those so-called experts.
And on a thread about Imaginary Property rights to boot. If you get flagged for being a troll, you'll comain that we are just being elitist and following the herd, lol.
Maybe there are other venue's better suited to pseudo-science and anti-vaxxing?
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: Re: False Argument
Fascist says what?
Apparently they say, "Don't be mean to those skinheads, that may be early pattern balding! Just because they have a swastika tattoo doesn't mean they aren't Very Fine People!! And they person they are kicking probably deserved it anyway."
At least, that is what crybaby Ham says.
On the post: Courts Again Shoot Down FCC For Ignoring The Law, Making Up Stuff
They Hate our Freedom
Net Neutrality and CDA 230 are the keys to an open, working internet. Anyone that wants them struck down should be looked at with a good deal of suspicion. Pretty much any close examination shows they are trying to take power away from people and giving it to corporations so they can sell it back.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: False Argument
People might not have hair for a lot of reasons, for example.
Wow, way to toss the strawmen under the buss crybaby. Nothing wrong with being bald. You you do want to lie down with the white supremacists and that really isn't something worth debating.
But you missed the point - everyone has their opinion. No site is without bias. You want to take away Twitter's right to moderate but love sucking up to StormFront to "debate" the best way to stop the minorities from stealing their women.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
False Argument
I really think it's missing the point if we try to point out the lack of bias. The trolls feel persecuted and no one will ever change their mind.
More to the point - if companies have a liberal bias - so fucking what? So they believe in inclusion and healthcare. So what is the problem? You aren't going to regulate Gab, so why does Twitter need the government to step in to protect the Proud Boys? Asshole's bragging about "Scientifical Facts" on Reddit to "prove" their white-power viewpoints get downvoted. What is actually stopping the skinheads and assholes from voicing their opinion?
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re:
So what do we need to do to bring this fair and balanced reporting to Gab, Stormfront, 8Chan, InfoWars and Faux News?
On the post: Indian Counseling Company Files Criminal Complaint Against Blogger Who Informed It About A Sensitive Data Leak
Re: Re:
Normally attempted suicide is criminalized to allow "protective" incarceration.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Skinheads
So anyone anti-skinhead is obviously hostile to the KKK, Proud Boys, Neo-Nazi's and all the other Very Fine Trump supporters.
Therefore, proof of bias! Quasi-State!! Respect my anecdotal account!!!
Seriously anyone that keeps repeating this "Liberal Bias" theory needs to re-evaluate their talking points. Like it or not, online services have ToS that often leads to the ban hammer falling on skinheads. (As well as swatting random targets, because automatic filters suck.)
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: August 4th - 10th
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: crybaby hamilton does have a bit of a ring t
Crybaby Blue Balls wants to be recognized, but doesn't want anyone to be able to automatically find his old posts.
Look at how he has downloaded (and counted!) all my posts so he can stay up late and pour over them and count how many times I've called him "Corn Fed Wanker" or "Midwest Neo Nazi."
Since he changes his names, it is easy for a human to spot, not so easy for a computer.
Jhn Smith (The very fine scam artist) is a grifter plain and simple - he doesn't want to get pinned down. If he actually had a legitimate book business he'd be shoving his links in our face every post. Since he is using TOR he feels liberated and can make rape threats, cry about police charges, and then go home and fuck his goats without worry.
On the post: New Report Further Clarifies Foxconn's Wisconsin Deal Was An Unsustainable Joke
Re: Look, over there...now check out our awesome proposal
They won't learn as long as the "campaign donations" keep pouring in!
On the post: Class Action Lawsuit Hopes To Hold GitHub Responsible For Hosting Data From Capital One Breach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What is the relevant law?
Reading the suit now. They say Github violated state law, CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 1798.85
or otherwise make available to the general public.”
Some nice points:
They claim that GitHub failed up uphold their own terms of service. The TOS in question? "GitHub reserves the right to remove anyone at any time for any reason." So since GitHub has failed to remove Everyone, they haven't upheld their own TOS. Sounds legit!
Claims GitHub should have notified everyone involved about the breach. Clearly spurious - it wasn't a breach of GitHub data/users.
Claims GitHUb should have just plain known that the data was there. Also, clearly silly.
Super silly - claims GitHub is in violation of Federal law regarding safe storage of personal data. Again, not their data!
Oh - violation of federal Wiretap laws! I guess "Throw all the charges at the wall, see what sticks" is what they are going for.
On the post: Class Action Lawsuit Hopes To Hold GitHub Responsible For Hosting Data From Capital One Breach
Re: What is the relevant law?
According tot he article, GitHub obeyed that law and promptly removed it when informed.
They are suing for preemptive censoring of all GitHub data. Upload filters.
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: August 4th - 10th
Re: Re:
Probably nobody is interested in any opinions
Well you did get one point correct Hammy. Congrats!
Your posts are shit and you are a crybaby. If you don't like the TD moderation system, feel free to make a super-duper blog with clear rules that prevent people form calling you a shithead. :)
On the post: Class Action Lawsuit Hopes To Hold GitHub Responsible For Hosting Data From Capital One Breach
Re: How dare Github allow numeric digits to be used in code!
You laugh but that is the end-game for those crying about 230 protection. End all user content because it might be libelous, or copyrighted, or offensive.
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: August 4th - 10th
Re: Re: Re:
Why not publish what people think
Please point us to your much better blog where you do all this. Thanks!!
Put up or shutup, if you think TD is doing it wrong take your thumb out of your ass and prove it by doing better.
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: August 4th - 10th
Re:
What kind of society thrives in darkness and secrecy?
There is a secret society of dimwits that come here to post their praise of copyright when they aren't writing self-help books. They post anonymously and off topic. Hmmmm.
On the post: Unsealed Warrants Show SFPD Officer Told Judges He Was Targeting A Journalist, But Judges Approved Them Anyway
Re: I find this obvious.
Journalist is not a licensed or regulated profession like carpentry or medicine. The state does not give (nor can it revoke) your license as a journalist.
On the post: Comcast Wireless Joins Verizon In Charging You More For HD Video
Re: "the recent Trolling
Heya Blue Balls - Neutral would be charging for the data you use. This is charging different rates for "different" data. There I answered your stupid question - so mine is "What do you support - civil rights, or copy rights?" I'll wait.
On the post: Reaping What They Sowed: Recording Industry Now Quite Upset About Copyright Run Amok
Re: Re: Re:
You can only copyright a particular expression of dying.
That was once true, but due to the "Blurred Lines" ruling (as seen applied in more suits since) the "style" is now part of copyright and can be applied in overly broad ways.
On the post: Reaping What They Sowed: Recording Industry Now Quite Upset About Copyright Run Amok
Re: Re: Re: Re: Friday fake thoughts
You didn't post a multi-factored question, you asked why aren't people blaming the sun for climate change, and why are you all listening to those so-called experts.
And on a thread about Imaginary Property rights to boot. If you get flagged for being a troll, you'll comain that we are just being elitist and following the herd, lol.
Maybe there are other venue's better suited to pseudo-science and anti-vaxxing?
On the post: Reaping What They Sowed: Recording Industry Now Quite Upset About Copyright Run Amok
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Friday fake thoughts
Science is the study of God's creation
Wow, the threadjacker and science denier gets indignant but had god on his side so it's ok. Thanks for sharing, coward.
"Maybe those dumb astronomers have never actually measured the tilt of the Earth!" Yeah, that's the ticket.
Next >>