I understand the words. But nobody explains any semblance of how it’s true!
How does not taxing anyone under 20-25k make their lives more difficult.
How does a fully funded government, public free healthcare, minimum guaranteed income, free and funded education at all levels, hurt the poor.
“ "There’s only 3 national groups in the US for news.”
which is partially why you're so misinformed in general
Like how rittenhouse was a neo nazi who shot black people?
Is your random sampling of 2 Asian networks meant to prove something
Only that I don’t get any international coverage myself in general. I don’t exactly care much about international issues. Especially the majority Europe where I have no ties.
Bingo!
The general public, honestly, doesn’t.
And as soon as something pops up and say”…requires xyzabc”
They google or bing or duck their way to gh or sf and to “oh my”.
How many can actually pull source and compile it?
And why is it in source? More often than not it’s licensing.
”…that wealth is not in bank accounts and that you can't eat money”…
Well, actually: deink and remove security fibres. Given the money is cloth… you probably could. But I understand the point of the quote despite that minor inaccuracy.
Law of Diminishing Utility explained to you multiple times and you still don’t seem to either understand or care about it.
Neither. I’d rather use fair implementation. Fair being equal percentage.
Not to mention your idea very closely borders on outright communism in implementation.
From as they can and to as they need? (Yes a paraphrase)
A multi level tax system is not equality. It’s not fairness.
A flat tax, on the other side, is a very socialist idea.
Everyone capable of contributing does so. And the same is asked of all who can.
This country could have Medicare For All and tuition-free college and everything else “leftists” (and a lot of other people) want…
So would the corresponding flat tax with the increased flat corporate rates.
The top 10 companies in this country would do that at 40%. Apple made 274 billion dollars last year. 110 billion in taxes at 40%
The corporate tax rate would pay infrastructure and 3B bills, and current social expenditure: and that’s just the top 25 companies! Alone!
…at the cost of the lives of the poor?
It doesn’t cost the lives of the poor. In any way shape or form. In fact it bites the rich before it gets to their payout.
The dual system would 100% fund what we have, what you want, and much much more.
How much good could congress do just off the corporate taxes alone. At roughly 8 trillion per year?
So again, explain how that coupling of high corporate taxes and low personal takes, and a much higher minimum taxable income rate, double+ current, hurts the poor.
Bravo!
Exactly. The right to vote should not go away at all though. You should be voting from prison.
As for your firearm:
—thanks for staying at our jail. Here’s your shoes, laces, wallet, watch, long gun, phone, hand gun, shirt, … you weren’t wearing pants when you came in.—
I still question the ability of a offending criminal non resident to actually advance a suit without the government going along with it. They are not citizens nor legal residents.
So the government could easily use immunity to quash the suit. No?
Given the law does not make mention that “families” crossing the border illegally must not be separated.
Whatever feeling about the actions you have, where did they break the law?
There’s only 3 national groups in the US for news. (MS)NBC, CNN, and FoxNews.
Local and semi local is just that, local. I have no idea what’s on your tv screen.
OAN is on what, one service? So I don’t count that.
And since CNN and MSNBC tend to parrot each their other the combo name fits. MSNBCNN vs FoxNews.
It’s not necessarily clever. Just works.
As for international sources… I don’t live there. I live here. So I definitely don’t know what you are watching or reading unless it’s one of the two stations I do. NHK, KBS. Neither of which care about US news all that much.
And almost never cover it.
Keep in mind CNNs reach is far smaller than it was 6 years ago. Any poll they release (like FoxNews, MSNBC, or OAn) should be taken with a dump truck full of salt.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Uh, and he would do that to white men aiming weapons at him why?
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is why people hate you you scum
Sounds good to me!
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re: Re: Re:
I understand the words. But nobody explains any semblance of how it’s true!
How does not taxing anyone under 20-25k make their lives more difficult.
How does a fully funded government, public free healthcare, minimum guaranteed income, free and funded education at all levels, hurt the poor.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re:
“ "There’s only 3 national groups in the US for news.”
Like how rittenhouse was a neo nazi who shot black people?
Only that I don’t get any international coverage myself in general. I don’t exactly care much about international issues. Especially the majority Europe where I have no ties.
On the post: Trump Given 30 Days To Have His Social Media Site Comply With Open Source License
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wrong license
Bingo!
The general public, honestly, doesn’t.
And as soon as something pops up and say”…requires xyzabc”
They google or bing or duck their way to gh or sf and to “oh my”.
How many can actually pull source and compile it?
And why is it in source? More often than not it’s licensing.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re:
You don’t like simple answers to simple questions: do you?
How does increasing the annual tax-paid to $8 trillion and completely funding all current discussed social projects harm the poor.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re: Re: Re:
I don know. But the idea of a social base is part of socialism. A safety net.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re: Re: Re:
Except nobody has really shown how that would/could be done in a flat tax situation: as a flat tax has no deductions.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re:
Well, actually: deink and remove security fibres. Given the money is cloth… you probably could. But I understand the point of the quote despite that minor inaccuracy.
Neither. I’d rather use fair implementation. Fair being equal percentage.
Not to mention your idea very closely borders on outright communism in implementation.
From as they can and to as they need? (Yes a paraphrase)
A multi level tax system is not equality. It’s not fairness.
A flat tax, on the other side, is a very socialist idea.
Everyone capable of contributing does so. And the same is asked of all who can.
So would the corresponding flat tax with the increased flat corporate rates.
The top 10 companies in this country would do that at 40%. Apple made 274 billion dollars last year. 110 billion in taxes at 40%
The corporate tax rate would pay infrastructure and 3B bills, and current social expenditure: and that’s just the top 25 companies! Alone!
It doesn’t cost the lives of the poor. In any way shape or form. In fact it bites the rich before it gets to their payout.
The dual system would 100% fund what we have, what you want, and much much more.
How much good could congress do just off the corporate taxes alone. At roughly 8 trillion per year?
So again, explain how that coupling of high corporate taxes and low personal takes, and a much higher minimum taxable income rate, double+ current, hurts the poor.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: This is why people hate you you scum
Bravo!
Exactly. The right to vote should not go away at all though. You should be voting from prison.
As for your firearm:
—thanks for staying at our jail. Here’s your shoes, laces, wallet, watch, long gun, phone, hand gun, shirt, … you weren’t wearing pants when you came in.—
I mean: seriously.
On the post: Yes, Even If You Think Project Veritas Are A Bunch Of Malicious Grifters, FBI Raid Is Concerning
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I still question the ability of a offending criminal non resident to actually advance a suit without the government going along with it. They are not citizens nor legal residents.
So the government could easily use immunity to quash the suit. No?
Given the law does not make mention that “families” crossing the border illegally must not be separated.
Whatever feeling about the actions you have, where did they break the law?
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
… Are the same that burn crosses
You quote lyrics well.
And Yes. That is a sad truth.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Justice done
Everyone has their own opinion. Theirs is wrong. 🤪
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re:
I did. You just don’t like that I did.
“Because as far as I can tell 10% on a billion is quite a bit more than the zero these people pay now at the end of deductions and offsets”
Nobody is protecting the rich with a flat tax. It guarantees they pay their share of the rate.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
There’s only 3 national groups in the US for news. (MS)NBC, CNN, and FoxNews.
Local and semi local is just that, local. I have no idea what’s on your tv screen.
OAN is on what, one service? So I don’t count that.
And since CNN and MSNBC tend to parrot each their other the combo name fits. MSNBCNN vs FoxNews.
It’s not necessarily clever. Just works.
As for international sources… I don’t live there. I live here. So I definitely don’t know what you are watching or reading unless it’s one of the two stations I do. NHK, KBS. Neither of which care about US news all that much.
And almost never cover it.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
CNN and msnbc both claimed he shot a man with his hands up. Trial video confirms false.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: Brain side down
S.
L.
O.
W.
You make as much sense as a fireplace in a grain silo!
On the post: TECHLASH 2.0: The Next-Gen TECHLASH Is Bigger, Stronger & Faster
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I got that (I read the article).
Cable news polls are about as reliable as a infowars.
On the post: TECHLASH 2.0: The Next-Gen TECHLASH Is Bigger, Stronger & Faster
Re: Re:
Keep in mind CNNs reach is far smaller than it was 6 years ago. Any poll they release (like FoxNews, MSNBC, or OAn) should be taken with a dump truck full of salt.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Brain side down
What are you quoting. I didn’t say anything about toast.
Next >>