Jist out of curiosity, can you name the fraud that took advantage of your dunning-kruger to program you with that bullshit narrative, or are you just naturally a "useful" idiot?
Play fast and loose with definitions and context to weave your twisted narrative. In this instance, pretending that ice cores are the sole and only hard evidence we've ever had, ignoring the decates of carbon and temperature records scientists have recorded. (and the decades-old knowledge that humanity's carbon emissions were orders of magnitude above anything natural.
The facts that those who exclusively swallow disinformation don't know is that the Democratic politicians' actual position was that they'd distrust a vaccine released under Trump if he unduly pressured the FDA into releasing it without proper safety/efficacy testing.
A valid concern, given Trump's history of undue agency pressure, embrace of dangerous and ineffective treatments, and desperation for positive election-season spin.
As for the second revisionism gaslighting, even Exxon knew humanity was causing global warming back in the '70s. They used the evidence they had then to accurately predict the ~1C warming we've hit today. Because that's how climate models work - they're built off of hard data.
The only climate predictions that were not based on real-world evidence, the only ones that have never accurately predicted current trends, were the sham models that pretend that it was anything but humanity that was the root cause.
Why do you refuse to tell us what opinions are being censored?
Koby's the only one here demanding the censorship of speech he doesn't like ("We don't tolerate Nazis here" etc.), and his baseless argumebts are the weakest in the entire thread, so...
On the post: Now It's Harvard Business Review Getting Section 230 Very, Very Wrong
Re: A solution with a better critique
Arguments against Section 230 that don't lie about it:
Yep... still #0
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Re: Re: Re: Show Some Integrity Maybe
Chozen has never had the first clue about how the law works.
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Re: Re: Imagine that, lying has consequences
[Lostinlodos-level projection of facts not in evidence]
On the post: Facebook Is NOT The Internet; Stop Regulating As If It Was
Re: Re: One Size Doesn't Fit All
No, because flagging isn't censoring.
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Re:
That's basically his pillow business as well.
On the post: Facebook Is NOT The Internet; Stop Regulating As If It Was
Re: One Size Doesn't Fit All
As usual, every word of what you wrote is wtong.
On the post: Rockstar Begins A War On Modders For 'GTA' Games For Totally Unclear Reasons
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Remember that derivative works were inserted into copyrignt in the late 1970s.
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Jist out of curiosity, can you name the fraud that took advantage of your dunning-kruger to program you with that bullshit narrative, or are you just naturally a "useful" idiot?
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And there's your M.O.
Play fast and loose with definitions and context to weave your twisted narrative. In this instance, pretending that ice cores are the sole and only hard evidence we've ever had, ignoring the decates of carbon and temperature records scientists have recorded. (and the decades-old knowledge that humanity's carbon emissions were orders of magnitude above anything natural.
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Rockstar Begins A War On Modders For 'GTA' Games For Totally Unclear Reasons
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You misunderarand; pathological liar Tero Pulkinnen's post was indisputable proof of my claim.
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you cared at al about facts, you would know that if there were no evidence, there would be no models.
But feel free to stick to your baseless conjecture that the evidence you choose to be blind to whe shown doesn't exist.
On the post: Rockstar Begins A War On Modders For 'GTA' Games For Totally Unclear Reasons
Re: Re:
Proof
On the post: Rockstar Begins A War On Modders For 'GTA' Games For Totally Unclear Reasons
The brain infection known as Copyright leads one to the delusion they have the right to control the creative work of others.
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The facts that those who exclusively swallow disinformation don't know is that the Democratic politicians' actual position was that they'd distrust a vaccine released under Trump if he unduly pressured the FDA into releasing it without proper safety/efficacy testing.
A valid concern, given Trump's history of undue agency pressure, embrace of dangerous and ineffective treatments, and desperation for positive election-season spin.
As for the second revisionism gaslighting, even Exxon knew humanity was causing global warming back in the '70s. They used the evidence they had then to accurately predict the ~1C warming we've hit today. Because that's how climate models work - they're built off of hard data.
The only climate predictions that were not based on real-world evidence, the only ones that have never accurately predicted current trends, were the sham models that pretend that it was anything but humanity that was the root cause.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/08/a-look-back-at-very-bad-predictions-of-global-cooling /
On the post: Texas Legislature Has Another Ridiculous And Unconstitutional Content Moderation Bill; Say Goodbye To Email Filters
Re: IMPEDING ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES PROHIBITED
Spammers for Republicans once argued they had a first-Amebnment right to fill up victims' voicemail boxes.
On the post: Why Companies Keep Folding to Copyright Pressure, Even If They Shouldn't
This something the phrase "copyright theft" actually fits.
On the post: Now It's Harvard Business Review Getting Section 230 Very, Very Wrong
Re: Re: Additional Appreciation
Why do you refuse to tell us what opinions are being censored?
Koby's the only one here demanding the censorship of speech he doesn't like ("We don't tolerate Nazis here" etc.), and his baseless argumebts are the weakest in the entire thread, so...
On the post: Now It's Harvard Business Review Getting Section 230 Very, Very Wrong
Re: Re: Re:
Translation: Koby's tagline is therefore weak.
On the post: Bad Faith Politicians Are Using Social Media Suspension To Boost Their Own Profiles
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Does it surprise anyone that reality is not how Lyinlodos deliberately misrepresents it here?
Next >>