I am completely baffled at why you continue to single out YouTube. Far from simply adhering to the letter of the law, YouTube goes far out of its way to help copyright owners locate infringement and enforce their copyrights. I cannot think of anything more they could possibly due that wouldn't make it impossible to offer the service at all.
THIS. Google/YouTube has bent over backwards for these assholes. It's time Google tells them to fuck off and police themselves.
"I must say, Google/YouTube has been far and away more accommodating than I would have in their shoes.
I'd have said "here's an RSS feed with every newly uploaded video. You do know what an RSS feed is right? Anyhow, with this setting up your own system to check every video uploaded should be a snap. Then just let us know which ones are infringing. Have a nice day." and left those clueless bastards scratching their asses and wondering just how they were going to figure out how to set up such a thing, let along pay for it."
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 17th, 2011 @ 2:19pm
"Actually, it is my understanding that hell is were people who willfully disbelieve go. Simply being a non-believer is a forgivable offense."
So proselytizing sends people to hell? If the person was never told about the kingdom (or whatever) then they are forgiven, but the minute a christian tells them and they make the decision that it's a bunch of hooey they go to hell?
Nice to know some christians are actively damning people.
"Then again anyone who subscribes to an absolute view without clear evidence is subjecting themselves to belief (even if that belief is dis-belief)."
Where is this evidence that you speak of? If you have evidence of god I think some people might be interested....
On the post: Of Course: New Fox Delay Means More Unauthorized Downloads Of Fox Shows
Re: Re: Re:
...trust me, they know...
/foil_hat
On the post: Chorus Of Mainstream Press Saying The Patent System Is Broken Gets Louder
Re:
You forgot your sarc tag, but it probably doesn't matter: most people will clearly see the sarcasm, I'm sure.
On the post: Argentine ISPs Block Over A Million Blogs In Response To Court Order To Block Two
Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll Response #1
FTFY
On the post: Can PROTECT IP Be Fixed?
Re:
Do you often state what a problem is in one sentence, then ask what it is in the next?
On the post: Can PROTECT IP Be Fixed?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
So you find free speech and due process specious?
Good to know. Thanks for the insight into your "thought" process.
On the post: Can PROTECT IP Be Fixed?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
THIS. Google/YouTube has bent over backwards for these assholes. It's time Google tells them to fuck off and police themselves.
I like :Lobo Santo's response in another thread:
"I must say, Google/YouTube has been far and away more accommodating than I would have in their shoes.
I'd have said "here's an RSS feed with every newly uploaded video. You do know what an RSS feed is right? Anyhow, with this setting up your own system to check every video uploaded should be a snap. Then just let us know which ones are infringing. Have a nice day." and left those clueless bastards scratching their asses and wondering just how they were going to figure out how to set up such a thing, let along pay for it."
On the post: 'Real Names' Doesn't Exactly Guarantee A High Level Of Conversation Either
Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 17th, 2011 @ 2:19pm
Plus, last week the jehovah's witnesses were making their rounds; I'm still a little touchy. ;)
No offense intended.
On the post: Once Again, Basic Detective Work Tracks Down Criminal Activity Done On Open WiFi
Re: Re: Feeble thesis. %99 percent is coming up with a suspect.
On the post: Yet Another 'Rogue Site' List Proposed, This Time With YouTube Right On Top
Re: Automation Accommodation
On the post: US Court Tells Brazilian Court To Stop Ruling On Copyright Issue That It Wants To Rule On First
Re: Re:
Marked your comment funny because of this.
On the post: 'Real Names' Doesn't Exactly Guarantee A High Level Of Conversation Either
Re: Re: Any arrests?
On the post: 'Real Names' Doesn't Exactly Guarantee A High Level Of Conversation Either
Re: Re: Any arrests?
On the post: 'Real Names' Doesn't Exactly Guarantee A High Level Of Conversation Either
Re: Any arrests?
Response to threats only applies to non-christians.
On the post: 'Real Names' Doesn't Exactly Guarantee A High Level Of Conversation Either
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 17th, 2011 @ 2:19pm
So proselytizing sends people to hell? If the person was never told about the kingdom (or whatever) then they are forgiven, but the minute a christian tells them and they make the decision that it's a bunch of hooey they go to hell?
Nice to know some christians are actively damning people.
"Then again anyone who subscribes to an absolute view without clear evidence is subjecting themselves to belief (even if that belief is dis-belief)."
Where is this evidence that you speak of? If you have evidence of god I think some people might be interested....
On the post: Police Say They Can Detain Photographers If Their Photographs Have 'No Apparent Esthetic Value'
Re:
Your personal experience can't automatically be extrapolated to others'.
On the post: Police Say They Can Detain Photographers If Their Photographs Have 'No Apparent Esthetic Value'
Re: Re: Re: Empty rhetoric on both sides
WysiWyg's point was that even though you are an immature, empty-headed idiot, you managed to make an inadvertent point that EXACTLY ECHOES MIKE'S.
But, continue on in ignorance, please; you seem to be better at making points that way anyway (and it's very entertaining to boot).
On the post: Stealing Isn't Saving, But Sharing Isn't Stealing
Re: Re:
On the post: Where In Trademark Law Does It Say It's Okay To Trademark A Town Name 'For The Good Of The Community'?
Re: City in China
Do you guys even make anything, darryl?
On the post: After Widespread Cheating, FBI Will Retest Agents On Surveillance Guidelines... With Much Easier Test
Re: Cheating
If their testes are failing, they have more to worry about than some stupid training. :)
On the post: Will TV Providers Finally Realize That People Really Are Cutting The Cord -- And Not Just Because Of The Economy
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sigh
FTFY ;)
Next >>