Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Small communities versus the entire world
I think depending on social mores is great, but I can think of many cases where it won't apply.
Suzanne you have a gift to give a long historical round up. It seems from this perspective that the ball falls out of your hand before just as you get to your last line.
"Well, it's easier to sell a book around a new term than an old generic term like publicity. I agree that it's a bit awkward, but also recognize that it can force people to rethink or re-evaluate a perception. So I kinda see it both ways..."
I don't hold its accountability in question what I hold in question is when a community edits something on a moments notice. It's been a while I suppose since I've used it but if there is a debate on some fact it changes back and forth between the two or more viewpoints.
So if you take the page at face value you get one side and come back tomorrow and the facts have changed because of the communities' edits.
Given the highly dynamic and volatile nature of politics it paints an ugly picture for the future of community driven fact checking. As justok said, who fact checks the fact checkers?
Anybody know if If there a system in place for this, if any at all?
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea, but looking before leaping here.
Isn't this what wikipedia is right now in the sense the facts are community driven. We've seen the hit and miss nature of it. You said its not a Free for all like Wikipedia but though still wondering if it doesn't degrade to one. So, i'm curious, what's in place to keep the community taking the wheel?
Going to have to agree here with the AC. You've said it yourself mike; Bureaucracies... well fill in the blanks.
This country was founded on the people haveing the power not the federal government. It may not be perfect system but let people govern themselves as our founding fathers intended. Though I praise you for making us aware of system that works and needs to be spread Mike. In fact the state that comes up with the best solution is then followed suit by other states; this is how innovations in the judiciary level of self governance are intended to work.
When you leave it to one body you get government interest before the peoples.
I think my phychology professor shared this once...
We are perpetually in a state of wanting something:
As kids we scream for it
As teens we rebel for it
As adults we scheme for it.
Tell us not to do something were going to find a way to do it. Just for the experience. It's not wanting something that is the cause but the curiosity of human nature.
The name of the Renaissance painter escapes me and I'm probably mutilating the quote but;
"I do things I cant do, simply to learn how to do them"
& for all the cats out there;
"... And satisfaction brought them back"
I needn't ask you to do you own homework on this but this has gone on for years. Techdirt may have been "alert" but certaintly not awake to the wider picture.
I was a long time infowarrior and i think one of the articles reference you mike, been a fan ever since.
Incidents such as these have been going on long long time before Alex Jones predicted and I might add "on the record" The events and target and patsy of 9-11. I did have my URL for a while to infowars.com I guess its time to put it back.
Ye I wish to share more: We live in a society that expects it from there government now. Wonder why stuff like this goes on? The term is reality engineering and the corporate lawyer backing the case sounds like just the kind of ass hole we look up to these days.
oh didn't you know the War on... is just to keep you from relizing the following:
Homeland Security is the gestapo.
NBC & ABC are the propoganda spreaders.
Fox is the only one rebelling
Oh yeah...
That you can only own a gun or hunt with the government say so. Don't live in a Dictatorship? Look at the patriot act and tell me if congress has ANY power any more.
On the post: District Court Smacks Down Tiffany (Yet Again) In Fight With eBay Over Counterfeit Items
Re:
Big Time Patent Attorney Jumps Into The Patent Trolling Game By Buying 4,500 Patents From Micron
...Such is the state of our broken patent system.
On the post: How Social Mores Can Deal With 'Unfair' Copying, Even In Absence Of Copyright
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Small communities versus the entire world
1) got the reference
and uber kudos
2) Relive the relevance to the Headline to this article
On the post: How Social Mores Can Deal With 'Unfair' Copying, Even In Absence Of Copyright
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Small communities versus the entire world
Suzanne you have a gift to give a long historical round up. It seems from this perspective that the ball falls out of your hand before just as you get to your last line.
My curiosity piqued I must know. What cases?
smores are great
Come with us to candy mountain Suzanne?
On the post: Why Is Righthaven Demanding The Domain Names Of Sites It Sues?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Righthaven - Domain Name Transfer Demand
I still giggle at people and remember the above when I ask friends "why pay a tax on something at all?"
On the post: Filipino Gov't Loses Court Case Because It Relied On Wikipedia
Next...
On the post: Abundance And Scarcity In Privacy
Re: Re: Re: How About "Publicity"?
On the post: Abundance And Scarcity In Privacy
Re: Re: How About "Publicity"?
Defining Orwell's doublespeak.
On the post: Everyone Has Something To Hide: Why Privacy Is Important Even If 'You've Done Nothing Wrong'
Grins
Given the tone and the timing I wonder if you subscribe to Lew Rockwell too Mike.
On the post: Crowdsourced Fact Checking
Re: Re: Small question
So if you take the page at face value you get one side and come back tomorrow and the facts have changed because of the communities' edits.
Given the highly dynamic and volatile nature of politics it paints an ugly picture for the future of community driven fact checking. As justok said, who fact checks the fact checkers?
Anybody know if If there a system in place for this, if any at all?
On the post: Crowdsourced Fact Checking
Small question
Isn't this what wikipedia is right now in the sense the facts are community driven. We've seen the hit and miss nature of it. You said its not a Free for all like Wikipedia but though still wondering if it doesn't degrade to one. So, i'm curious, what's in place to keep the community taking the wheel?
On the post: Weak Anti-SLAPP Laws Don't Help Anyone
Re:
This country was founded on the people haveing the power not the federal government. It may not be perfect system but let people govern themselves as our founding fathers intended. Though I praise you for making us aware of system that works and needs to be spread Mike. In fact the state that comes up with the best solution is then followed suit by other states; this is how innovations in the judiciary level of self governance are intended to work.
When you leave it to one body you get government interest before the peoples.
On the post: A Timeline Of How The Entertainment Industry Made The File Sharing Issue Much Worse For Itself
I think my phychology professor shared this once...
As kids we scream for it
As teens we rebel for it
As adults we scheme for it.
Tell us not to do something were going to find a way to do it. Just for the experience. It's not wanting something that is the cause but the curiosity of human nature.
The name of the Renaissance painter escapes me and I'm probably mutilating the quote but;
"I do things I cant do, simply to learn how to do them"
& for all the cats out there;
"... And satisfaction brought them back"
After all fun is why were here.
On the post: There Is No Such Thing As Search Neutrality, Because The Whole Point Of Search Is To Recommend What's Best
Re: Search Neutrality vs. Red Herring
I wish you were being sarcastic but your not. Are you even aware that people have the power to give a thumbs up or thumbs down?
Probably not, because by the looks of things your still looking up for answers.
On the post: Could AT&T's iPad Email Leak Really Be A Much, Much More Serious Security Breach?
Do you own homework.
Please open thy eyes to the world around you!
Telecoms fund and supply info to big brother too.
Rage against the machine.
On the post: Police And Courts Regularly Abusing Wiretapping Laws To Arrest People For Filming Cops Misbehaving In Public Places
Infowarrior
Incidents such as these have been going on long long time before Alex Jones predicted and I might add "on the record" The events and target and patsy of 9-11. I did have my URL for a while to infowars.com I guess its time to put it back.
On the post: And We're Off: Hurt Locker Files First 5,000 Lawsuits Against File Sharers
Really Mike?
On the post: Not Illegal To Ask Your Fans To Spam A Judge... Though, Still Not Particularly Smart
"Just keep kicking them in the nutz"
Sometimes it does take something like this to wake people up. Otherwise is passed over. Words of wisdom folks, never take it lying down.
On the post: Confusion Over Liability Extends To The Real World, Rather Than Just Online
Define Despotism
Ye I wish to share more: We live in a society that expects it from there government now. Wonder why stuff like this goes on? The term is reality engineering and the corporate lawyer backing the case sounds like just the kind of ass hole we look up to these days.
On the post: Progress And Innovation Cannot Be Stopped -- Merely Hindered
"The planet is fine, the people are fucked." - George Carlin may his soul never rest
On the post: Dear Journalists: There Is No Cyberwar
Re: Re: Please not another "War on ...." crusade
Homeland Security is the gestapo.
NBC & ABC are the propoganda spreaders.
Fox is the only one rebelling
Oh yeah...
That you can only own a gun or hunt with the government say so. Don't live in a Dictatorship? Look at the patriot act and tell me if congress has ANY power any more.
Next >>