i really do not understand why a gov agency FCC usa ofcom uk have to get involved in the internet they are the woest people to put in charge. ofcom and fcc are primarally responcible for broadcasting. look at the mess both have allowed there.
take the discussion a few steps further. A friend recommends a book, the book id out of print the publisher has no plans to reprint is it then ethical to download from P"P I say yes and the same foe music.
what is harmfull about pictures of streets any one can walk down that street and see the same thing daily nothing wrong there. nothing wrong with collecting wi fi spots.
as i if i buy a paper tend to buy either the gaurdian or telegraph then murdoch can have his paywall. only wish it was a real wall and we could put rupert and his entire family behind it. then drop the lot in the Atlantic ocean.
why would we say before (or after) the playing of a song some company sponcer them. If the company want us to say that "pay us" we dont do advertising for free.
mike di not say copied CDs just copyrighted material therefore i assume some of the sales were actually people selling therir old CD / vynal collections or dealing in second hand material. which is surely legal.either that or the copies may actuallt be of goodd quality.
the correct quote is I dont care what the press say as long as they spell my name correctly only i forget qho said it. As for TAM I have found that old ZX81 and it is ready to transplant into your head. Just call my office and head to the nearest rat infested place near you (must be one) then we can go ahead.Then after you will be cured of all you problems.
please answear the following
1 are you now saying it is wrong for artists etc to send their music to myself and people in broadcasting in the hope we may give it airtime?
2 would you like your whole family to be given a life sentence for a murder none of you committed.
with question 1 remember UK radio stations pay copyright around £5 per play which should go to the artist i doudt the artist sees much of that due to money grabbing record companies.
Andy are you now saying it is wrong for artists etc to send their music to myself and people in broadcasting in the hope we may give it airtime?
I tend to avoid the majors and head for independent lables and artists but that is slightly off topic.
First I will answear your question I dont need to buy i get enough music sent to me by arteists or music companies wanting me to put their music on my radio shows. as too anyone else i cant answear.
what i said was the same thing only much more gross than just fileshearing. which compared to murder is miniscule. but the same principal is i there in that senario people are accused with no day in court so you now answear my question would you like your whole family to be given a life sentence for a murder none of you committed.
Andy another troll?
Understand this it is not that the bill goes after pirates it is the way it does it. on mere accuations NO PROOF REQUIRED NO CHECKS AND NO REAL REDRESS.
It is the same as a murder being committed outside your house police then kick in your door arrest you and give you your family even any kids or babys a life sentance NO COURT CASE NEVER MIND YOU WERE NOT IN AT THE TIME NO REDRESS that is what is wrong with this crazy law. that apart the fact the gov. are spying on where you go on line. looking at who you talk too even in instant messages etc IT HAS TO GO. no if or buts get rid of the crap.
On the post: Laptop Scandal School's Own Law Firm: Aside From Those 58,000 Spy Photos, There's No Evidence Of Spying
On the post: The FCC Shakes Things Up (Somewhat) On The Net Neutrality Front
On the post: 50 Cent Says The Movie Industry Will Get New Laws Passed That Will Help The Music Industry
Re: Re:
On the post: Mitch Wagner Asks About Ethics Of Downloading Media You Already Paid For
ok lets
On the post: UK's Turn To Worry About Google's Gathering Of Harmless, Public Wi-Fi Information
so
On the post: As Murdoch Puts Times Online Behind A Paywall, Competitors Happily Plan To Stay Free
gurdian
On the post: India Introduces Draft Copyright Amendments; Some Good, Some Bad
indias polititions
On the post: Band Says: If You Want To File Share Our Music, Cool, But Please Share It Widely
Re:
On the post: Now Available At Your Local Flea Market: Safe Harbors
it said
On the post: Towing Company Feels The Streisand Effect After Suing A College Kid For $750k
the
On the post: UK Musician's Open Letter To Musicians Union Over Its Support Of The Digital Economy Bill
several musitions feel the same
slightly off topic several people have told their ISPs join with talk talk or we leave.
On the post: UK ISP Says It Will Not Follow Digital Economy Bill Rules
still no answear
1 are you now saying it is wrong for artists etc to send their music to myself and people in broadcasting in the hope we may give it airtime?
2 would you like your whole family to be given a life sentence for a murder none of you committed.
with question 1 remember UK radio stations pay copyright around £5 per play which should go to the artist i doudt the artist sees much of that due to money grabbing record companies.
On the post: UK ISP Says It Will Not Follow Digital Economy Bill Rules
he wont answear
I see nothing wrong in trying before you buy.
On the post: UK ISP Says It Will Not Follow Digital Economy Bill Rules
hang on
I tend to avoid the majors and head for independent lables and artists but that is slightly off topic.
On the post: UK ISP Says It Will Not Follow Digital Economy Bill Rules
you still havnt understood
what i said was the same thing only much more gross than just fileshearing. which compared to murder is miniscule. but the same principal is i there in that senario people are accused with no day in court so you now answear my question would you like your whole family to be given a life sentence for a murder none of you committed.
On the post: UK ISP Says It Will Not Follow Digital Economy Bill Rules
andy
Understand this it is not that the bill goes after pirates it is the way it does it. on mere accuations NO PROOF REQUIRED NO CHECKS AND NO REAL REDRESS.
It is the same as a murder being committed outside your house police then kick in your door arrest you and give you your family even any kids or babys a life sentance NO COURT CASE NEVER MIND YOU WERE NOT IN AT THE TIME NO REDRESS that is what is wrong with this crazy law. that apart the fact the gov. are spying on where you go on line. looking at who you talk too even in instant messages etc IT HAS TO GO. no if or buts get rid of the crap.
On the post: Newspapers Pushing For Hot News Doctrine May Find It Comes Back To Bite Them
have they not thought
On the post: US Industry Lobbyists Hope India Will Lock Up More Potential Copyright Infringers
please
On the post: Could Copyright Hold Back iPad Sales In Canada And Elsewhere?
mmmm
On the post: Peter Mandelson Accepts Responsibility For Copyright Infringing Political Poster?
tag
Next >>