Another lie from you. You've rejected every other attempt to correct you before, your pretense that this time will be different is unconvincing.
You've already stated several times that the more a source lies to you, the more trustworthy you believe it to be; you've never let yourself be corrected by the facts we (Mostly Paul amd Stephen) keep providing you.
Ceensorship, bigotry, misogyny, racist election interference -- Why is it that it's exclusively Republicans that always lie about the nature of Republican laws?
No, Bobmail/Koby/Chozen - platforms, just like they aren't one particular shopping mall are not schools either, despite how often you keep getting schooled on this platform.
On the post: FBI Cites Guidelines That Don't Actually Forbid Social Media Monitoring As The Reason It Was Blindsided By The January 6 Attack
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I denounce the terrorist propaganda you parrot here unthinkingly.
On the post: FBI Cites Guidelines That Don't Actually Forbid Social Media Monitoring As The Reason It Was Blindsided By The January 6 Attack
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Another lie from you. You've rejected every other attempt to correct you before, your pretense that this time will be different is unconvincing.
You've already stated several times that the more a source lies to you, the more trustworthy you believe it to be; you've never let yourself be corrected by the facts we (Mostly Paul amd Stephen) keep providing you.
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Re: Re:
Like Stephen said, back off to Infowars with you, vermin.
On the post: FBI Cites Guidelines That Don't Actually Forbid Social Media Monitoring As The Reason It Was Blindsided By The January 6 Attack
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Once again, you prove me correct as always with that little work of fiction you wrote there yet presented as though a single part of it were true.
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re:
How about stop pretending the latter exists, as though it's different from the former?
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Help Me
No, you can't. Never have, never will.
On the post: FBI Cites Guidelines That Don't Actually Forbid Social Media Monitoring As The Reason It Was Blindsided By The January 6 Attack
Re: Re: Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Re: Re: Re: A quick reminder
You did it to be intentionally misleading, got it.
On the post: FBI Cites Guidelines That Don't Actually Forbid Social Media Monitoring As The Reason It Was Blindsided By The January 6 Attack
Re:
We understand that you're unable to tell fact from fiction.
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Re: Communists
Spoiler alert: They'll never be able to fulfill your request.
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Communists
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Not a mistake
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: No, The White House Isn't Colluding With Facebook To Silence Dissent; But It Sure Could Have Handled Things Better
Re: Re: A quick reminder
Why do you omit the fact that the airwaves were government property?
On the post: It Appears That Jason Miller's GETTR Is Speed Running The Content Moderation Learning Curve Faster Than Parler
Re:
There are two groups:
Those that believe Project Veritas is credible and truthful, and
Those who don't have dementia.
There is zero overlap between the two.
On the post: Florida Tells Court: Actually, It's Section 230 That's Unconstitutional (Not Our Social Media Law)
Re: Re:
[Hlucinates facts not in reality]
On the post: Florida Tells Court: Actually, It's Section 230 That's Unconstitutional (Not Our Social Media Law)
Ceensorship, bigotry, misogyny, racist election interference -- Why is it that it's exclusively Republicans that always lie about the nature of Republican laws?
On the post: Wisconsin Senator's Social Media Bill Aims To Save The First Amendment By Violating The First Amendment
Reminder: "No spam allowed" remains lawful free speech.
On the post: How Sketchy Data Scavengers Are Using Hatred Of 'Big Tech' To Attack Plans To Make The Web More Private
Would you rather have control your browser's privacy responses, or have shady brokers like Roswell have the keys to your identity?
On the post: Exactly Right: 'You're Not Entitled To A Platform, Boomer.'
Re: "You're not entitled to a phone or emergency services, boome
Becaiae that lie only appears in demented hallucinations, nowhere in the real world.
On the post: Sixth Circuit Says School Board Can't Boot People From Meetings Just Because It Doesn't Like What They're Saying
Note:
No, Bobmail/Koby/Chozen - platforms, just like they aren't one particular shopping mall are not schools either, despite how often you keep getting schooled on this platform.
Next >>