my ignorance.....too quick to jump to false conclusions, my bad.
The subject of space tech is fascinating, definitely worth lurking into on your day off.
GPS = free ( funded by US tax payer ) but the US military control it. The patent filed in 2003. Designed to make Galileo and GPS Block III satellites compatible.(due for launch in 2014). Recommended for adoption by Europe and the USA in 2006.
Galileo ( funded by nearly every other country )
Galileo is intended to be an EU GNSS civilian system that allows all users access to it. GPS is a US GNSS military system that provides location signals that have high precision to US military users, while also providing less precise location signals to others. The GPS had the capability to block the "civilian" signals while still being able to use the "military" signal (M-band). A primary motivation for the Galileo project was European concern that the US could deny others access to GPS during political disagreements.[7]
Since Galileo was designed to provide the highest possible precision (possibly even greater than GPS) to anyone, the US was concerned that an enemy could use Galileo signals in military strikes against the US and its allies (some weapons like missiles use GNSS systems for guidance). The frequency initially chosen for Galileo would have made it impossible for the US to block the Galileo signals without also interfering with their own GPS signals. The US did not want to lose their GNSS capability with GPS while denying enemies the use of GNSS. Some US officials became especially concerned when Chinese interest in Galileo was reported.[35]
An anonymous European official claimed that the US officials implied that they might consider shooting down Galileo satellites in the event of a major conflict in which Galileo was used in attacks against American forces.[36] The EU's stance is that Galileo is a neutral technology, available to all countries and everyone. At first, EU officials did not want to change their original plans for Galileo, but have since reached a compromise, that Galileo was to use a different frequency. This allowed the blocking/jamming of one GNSS system without affecting the other, giving the US a greater advantage in conflicts in which it has the electronic warfare upper hand.[37] However, the frequency difference also makes it possible to jam the GPS without affecting the Galileo.
One of the reasons given for developing Galileo as an independent system was that position information from GPS can be made significantly inaccurate by the deliberate application of universal Selective Availability (SA) by the US military; this was enabled until 2000, and can be re-enabled at any time. GPS is widely used worldwide for civilian applications; Galileo's proponents argued that civil infrastructure, including aeroplane navigation and landing, should not rely solely upon a system with this vulnerability.
On May 2, 2000, SA was disabled by President of the United States Bill Clinton; in late 2001 the entity managing the GPS confirmed that they did not intend to enable selective availability ever again.[40] Though Selective Availability capability still exists, on 19 September 2007 the US Department of Defense announced that newer GPS satellites would not be capable of implementing Selective Availability;[41] the wave of Block IIF satellites launched in 2009, and all subsequent GPS satellites, do not support SA. As old satellites are replaced in the GPS modernization program, SA will cease to be an option. The modernization programme also contains standardized features that allow GPS III and Galileo systems to inter-operate, allowing receivers to be developed to utilise GPS and Galileo together to create an even more precise GNSS system.
The Sauce http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_%28satellite_navigation%29 http://www.insidegnss.com/node/3040 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/30/ministry_defence_gps_patent/ http://www.director.co.uk/magazine/2012/03_March/Space%20economy_65_07.html
TL;DR (nontechnical version)
The patent is for something to make two systems work together (GPS and Galileo).
US claims that the UK had insider info because of their work on Galileo.
The US hate the idea of global satellite positioning systems that they don't control.
The patent seems legit, but America don't like it, they want control of Galileo.
I hope it was for my work at exposing the hypocrite antipirate, getting him to willfully fund piracy, then making him delete the evidence of his criminality and hypocrisy.
If it is, I accept the nomination. I really should make that into an article.
Can we all get on the "same page" with this issue, please
Someone needs to write the bullet points first.
You have to play their game and drum the same message over and over and over again.(ad nauseum) Play on emotion is essential:
People are irrational beings, with no time to think deeply about a subject or to research facts.
If you garner peoples emotion, they will believe lies and ignore facts. (false narratives are lies) eg...FoxNews (there are more but, FoxNews is a pretty fucking good, all inclusive example of the point)
So if you want to succeed, don't expect rational to beat emotional.
We need to use rational to achieve emotional. That way you can justify with rational arguments while playing the emotional. Something FoxNews can't do, and why they are ridiculed by many.
Phrases to repeat ad nauseum: ( make more of them, and better of course )
Legal content is not the same as illegal content. (needs no work, I have cut that down over years of using it in the filesharing debate , usually I add a ridiculous example of legal content becoming illegal like, "or is the new Justin Beiber album illegal content ?" )
You WANT to HIDE, censor and HARBOR a paedo ? sickFuck, get the police to catch him and rescue the victim.
TL;DR
They are people with resources who are not beyond using highly emotional phrases to control the narrative.
If we all coordinate, we can put out a clear message, that not only is rational, it's emotional too. A well formed, clear and concise message being repeated ad nauseum by lot's of people, is good way to go.
We may even help in getting sickFucks arrested in the process.
Berenerd, that is a irritating and depressing story.
I hope you succeed in your educational, financial and career aims. Failing that, which may be a blessing in disguise, i hope you have a happier life than 0.2GPA genius girl !
You should look at what "0.2GPA genius girl" is doing now, it may make you lulz, for a start you know she aint got a Nobel Peace Prize for a spectacular physics discovery.
I bet ...a "beauty technician" or a willfully subordinate, dipsy housewife.
Appreciated appreciation.... is ....appreciation appreciated !
People ALWAYS take a side and stick to it dominantly... that is the key, also a reason WHY facts that contradict the perceived narrative are somewhat unsettling.
No need to twist, imply, use fallacies etc.. aka(a gift from Internet creator, Al Gore)
True.. He is digging his way to eternal hates-ville.
I don't think he cares much about how people see him, tho.
The going after charities was a tell tale sign of how much he cares about negative PR. All he cares about is the Law and currently, how to use it to destroy Inman.
But really, we have seen this from lawyers before and we will see it again.
100% Legal injustice happens all the time.
People are acting like it's the first time ever it has been attempted or seen, they also think that public opinion will change case law.
As if lawyers ever only work for ethical and moral causes... ( are people that delusional )
I do question the injustice part of this case, a defamation case is just that, and I don't see the injustice if Inman has to pay funnyjunk $20,000, for calling them "theives". But then again, I never bought into the whole "good defenseless cartoonist" narrative to begin with.
Last week The Economist magazine profiled Matthew Inman about the creation and revenue of his comic, “The Oatmeal.” They said that he did $1,000 a day in sales on a typical day and that he earned $70,000 in sales on a single day last year on Black Friday.
Yeah... my tinfoil hat protects me from people taking my money and giving it to charity.
Other benefits of tinfoil hats...
They reflect arguments from people who willfully ignore facts.
They are quite fashionable(Lie).
They can be converted into many things, like a ball (I am creative)
Not to be confused with Aluminum Foil hats, crazy people who jump to conclusions wear those.
On the post: UK Ministry of Defence Close To Gaining Patent On Key GPS Technology; US Not Amused
Put the Shoe on the Other Foot (still legit)
The subject of space tech is fascinating, definitely worth lurking into on your day off.
GPS = free ( funded by US tax payer ) but the US military control it.
The patent filed in 2003. Designed to make Galileo and GPS Block III satellites compatible.(due for launch in 2014). Recommended for adoption by Europe and the USA in 2006.
Galileo ( funded by nearly every other country )
Galileo is intended to be an EU GNSS civilian system that allows all users access to it. GPS is a US GNSS military system that provides location signals that have high precision to US military users, while also providing less precise location signals to others. The GPS had the capability to block the "civilian" signals while still being able to use the "military" signal (M-band). A primary motivation for the Galileo project was European concern that the US could deny others access to GPS during political disagreements.[7]
Since Galileo was designed to provide the highest possible precision (possibly even greater than GPS) to anyone, the US was concerned that an enemy could use Galileo signals in military strikes against the US and its allies (some weapons like missiles use GNSS systems for guidance). The frequency initially chosen for Galileo would have made it impossible for the US to block the Galileo signals without also interfering with their own GPS signals. The US did not want to lose their GNSS capability with GPS while denying enemies the use of GNSS. Some US officials became especially concerned when Chinese interest in Galileo was reported.[35]
An anonymous European official claimed that the US officials implied that they might consider shooting down Galileo satellites in the event of a major conflict in which Galileo was used in attacks against American forces.[36] The EU's stance is that Galileo is a neutral technology, available to all countries and everyone. At first, EU officials did not want to change their original plans for Galileo, but have since reached a compromise, that Galileo was to use a different frequency. This allowed the blocking/jamming of one GNSS system without affecting the other, giving the US a greater advantage in conflicts in which it has the electronic warfare upper hand.[37] However, the frequency difference also makes it possible to jam the GPS without affecting the Galileo.
One of the reasons given for developing Galileo as an independent system was that position information from GPS can be made significantly inaccurate by the deliberate application of universal Selective Availability (SA) by the US military; this was enabled until 2000, and can be re-enabled at any time. GPS is widely used worldwide for civilian applications; Galileo's proponents argued that civil infrastructure, including aeroplane navigation and landing, should not rely solely upon a system with this vulnerability.
On May 2, 2000, SA was disabled by President of the United States Bill Clinton; in late 2001 the entity managing the GPS confirmed that they did not intend to enable selective availability ever again.[40] Though Selective Availability capability still exists, on 19 September 2007 the US Department of Defense announced that newer GPS satellites would not be capable of implementing Selective Availability;[41] the wave of Block IIF satellites launched in 2009, and all subsequent GPS satellites, do not support SA. As old satellites are replaced in the GPS modernization program, SA will cease to be an option. The modernization programme also contains standardized features that allow GPS III and Galileo systems to inter-operate, allowing receivers to be developed to utilise GPS and Galileo together to create an even more precise GNSS system.
The Sauce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_%28satellite_navigation%29
http://www.insidegnss.com/node/3040
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/30/ministry_defence_gps_patent/
http://www.director.co.uk/magazine/2012/03_March/Space%20economy_65_07.html
TL;DR (nontechnical version)
The patent is for something to make two systems work together (GPS and Galileo).
US claims that the UK had insider info because of their work on Galileo.
The US hate the idea of global satellite positioning systems that they don't control.
The patent seems legit, but America don't like it, they want control of Galileo.
On the post: UK Ministry of Defence Close To Gaining Patent On Key GPS Technology; US Not Amused
Put the Shoe on the Other Foot
OH wait...who currently owns GPS
On the post: Can't We All Get Along: Principles Over Policy; Ideas Over Ideology
If it is, I accept the nomination.
I really should make that into an article.
On the post: Can't We All Get Along: Principles Over Policy; Ideas Over Ideology
nothing moar, nothing less
On the post: Can't We All Get Along: Principles Over Policy; Ideas Over Ideology
hiding, censoring and harboring pedophiles
Someone needs to write the bullet points first.
You have to play their game and drum the same message over and over and over again.(ad nauseum)
Play on emotion is essential:
People are irrational beings, with no time to think deeply about a subject or to research facts.
If you garner peoples emotion, they will believe lies and ignore facts. (false narratives are lies) eg...FoxNews (there are more but, FoxNews is a pretty fucking good, all inclusive example of the point)
So if you want to succeed, don't expect rational to beat emotional.
We need to use rational to achieve emotional. That way you can justify with rational arguments while playing the emotional. Something FoxNews can't do, and why they are ridiculed by many.
Phrases to repeat ad nauseum: ( make more of them, and better of course )
Legal content is not the same as illegal content.
(needs no work, I have cut that down over years of using it in the filesharing debate , usually I add a ridiculous example of legal content becoming illegal like, "or is the new Justin Beiber album illegal content ?" )
You WANT to HIDE, censor and HARBOR a paedo ? sickFuck, get the police to catch him and rescue the victim.
TL;DR
They are people with resources who are not beyond using highly emotional phrases to control the narrative.
If we all coordinate, we can put out a clear message, that not only is rational, it's emotional too. A well formed, clear and concise message being repeated ad nauseum by lot's of people, is good way to go.
We may even help in getting sickFucks arrested in the process.
On the post: Judge Posner: Do Most Industries Even Need Patents?
I hope he doesn't hear of my patent for cotton feet coverings.
On the post: University Sues Student For Graduating Too Fast
I hope you succeed in your educational, financial and career aims. Failing that, which may be a blessing in disguise, i hope you have a happier life than 0.2GPA genius girl !
You should look at what "0.2GPA genius girl" is doing now, it may make you lulz, for a start you know she aint got a Nobel Peace Prize for a spectacular physics discovery.
I bet ...a "beauty technician" or a willfully subordinate, dipsy housewife.
On the post: FBI Continues To Insist There's No Reason For Kim Dotcom To Be Able To See The Evidence Against Him
One word explanation ( use it for 99% of US topics )
On the post: University Sues Student For Graduating Too Fast
This world is completely corrupted.
Marcel Pohl deserves scholar of the year. What he done is called "making do with what you got".
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
WiNRAR_but why, i can not unsee things....WHY
Rule 34 has just been invoked.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
elipsis misuse...a common horror worse than murder
I will ignore your argument, until you can be civil.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
Soon I will be Moar powerful than my father (Al Gore) maaawwwhhaaahhhaaa
EXTRA PRIZE: 100 internets
for using the word "peasant"
BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME:
"commoner" would have got you 9001 internets
Close but no cigar...keep on hitting me, the star prize has to go.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
why..... thankyou !
People ALWAYS take a side and stick to it dominantly... that is the key, also a reason WHY facts that contradict the perceived narrative are somewhat unsettling.
No need to twist, imply, use fallacies etc.. aka(a gift from Internet creator, Al Gore)
I award you this LINK: How to troll a dating website (read the first image)
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
I don't think he cares much about how people see him, tho.
The going after charities was a tell tale sign of how much he cares about negative PR. All he cares about is the Law and currently, how to use it to destroy Inman.
But really, we have seen this from lawyers before and we will see it again.
100% Legal injustice happens all the time.
People are acting like it's the first time ever it has been attempted or seen, they also think that public opinion will change case law.
As if lawyers ever only work for ethical and moral causes... ( are people that delusional )
I do question the injustice part of this case, a defamation case is just that, and I don't see the injustice if Inman has to pay funnyjunk $20,000, for calling them "theives". But then again, I never bought into the whole "good defenseless cartoonist" narrative to begin with.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
Re: Re: Re: Re: The heartless one has a point
Speculation as to why... while ignoring the the real benefiter.
The Internet, being played by viral marketers and SEO's since 2000.
People will never get this.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
At the very least , call me a....... Ladyboy !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Oatmeal
How does a web comic earn $1,000 a day in revenue?
http://mixergy.com/matthew-inman-oatmeal-interview/
Last week The Economist magazine profiled Matthew Inman about the creation and revenue of his comic, “The Oatmeal.” They said that he did $1,000 a day in sales on a typical day and that he earned $70,000 in sales on a single day last year on Black Friday.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
YOU MUST STOP THIS....
SAY "HE IS WASTING TIME BEING AN IDIOT".....
That will change the world to fit your views.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
And WHO jumped to wild conclusions ?
Other benefits of tinfoil hats...
They reflect arguments from people who willfully ignore facts.
They are quite fashionable(Lie).
They can be converted into many things, like a ball (I am creative)
Not to be confused with Aluminum Foil hats, crazy people who jump to conclusions wear those.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
Re: Re: The heartless one has a point
You should have posted that on Inmans blog.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
Re: Re: The heartless one has a point
Giving other peoples money to charity to fight of a $20,000 defamation, while earning +$500,000 per year(let's make it well over $2million this year, considering the free manufactured publicity this is getting)
yes manufactured...same story, same narrative, same facts omitted, same biased angle... spammed and linked everywhere at the same time.
Admit..The story has shifted to "Carreon the Eviillll" which is fun to watch, and is all Careon's own work,
but... who didn't know that Lawyers don't give a fuck about bad PR ?
Casey Anthony Attorney, Jose Baez sure gave a lot of fucks...amirite?
Viral marketeer and SEo with previous link scamming history !
I have to give a fuck ?( he is a poor, defenseless cartoonist.. bullshit )
Next >>