"generate a Charitable Fund that has been used to bribe two major charities into tacitly endorsing a campaign that is utterly devoid of charitable purpose, and is a mere cover for a hate campaign"
I agree with this, (again... flame me for it please, I know you wanna)
Hate funnyjunk because of Inmans words... Donate to charity to make all defense of funnyjunk seem unethical....seems legit! (that's what happened) Proof of the effects (self centered version):
If I make ANY negative comment about Inman, the supporters come out in angry defense mode, in support of the poor, kind, charitable, defenseless cartoonist.
(that's a really accurate description...yeah..*cough *cough *bullshit *cough)
Also... You all forced me to marry him, remember ?... I am his wife, facepalm.gif The BEST outcome of all this manufactured drama
1. "Carreon The Evilllll" ® wins against "Inman the manipulative" ™
2. The charities get the money.
3. The Inman supporters see Inman for real.
4. Carreon get's a bj from his wife.
( the real reason he is fighting so hard, I did promise you that bj IF you win sweetheart )
5. ???????
6. Profit!TL;DR:
I am inviting you to hate me because.....
you give a fuck about a person that, you shouldn't give a fuck about.
PROTiP: Reply in angry comments only. ( moarr hate = moarr WiNcest amirite? )
BONUS POINTS: If you call me Carreon's wife and make a funny that makes US laugh.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
Google will nearly always take you to his version of the story or a comic, with the actual, independently, unbiased reported story on page 3+ of google search.( sometimes page 10+)
The joys of being an SEO, you can bury negative stories about yourself.
it's relevant...
The "poor defenseless Cartoonist" , that people gave a fuck about, is far from what they thought they gave a fuck about.
I had a good look into him.. BEFORE I gave a fuck about him.
I have been played before, by manipulation of conscience and emotion.
NOT this time.
what i saw...
Donating other peoples money to charity, to fight a defamation case is not logical, it serves only one purpose, manipulation of emotion.
He could easily afford to donate the money himself.
Among a shitload of other stuff... Not a fuck was given from that day forth.
about.. "Inmans Personal Army"
People are fucking crazy "white knighting" for Inman , he is moar than capable of taking care of himself.
Go ahead and be his hero, like he gives a fuck about you.
Maybe I have completely lost faith in humanity.
I mean...I really can't see Cisco giving a shit.
You can, and that's great, at least you are trying.(unlike me)
Honestly, I hope you are right and I am wrong.
But please don't let my opinion take away from your valued contribution.
If you are right, Cisco might listen and change, for the better of humanity.
And to other peeps lurking this thread..... email Cisco ( go go go)
Re: Re: Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
Google it: will always get you an Inman comic. Funny that? considering Inman was co-founder of a SEO company. Same thing happens when you google how much he made from selling his "Mingle2" dating site and when you look for info on how Google obliterated the site from its search results.
But Stephen Sherlock in Massachusetts didn't realise what was happening until we told him. Now, somewhat annoyed, he's removed the "offending code" - the link to cashadvance1500.com. "I don't like those who game the system. I'll be much more careful with the next opportunity to participate in a meme like this," he says.
Dan Thornton, a community marketing manager for Emap and editor for Disposable Media, innocently added the test to his blog. He says: "If I'd examined the HTML I definitely would not have included the link on my page, and would have publicised the fact that it's a scam.
"Hiding link code in a widget like this is basically using the same methods as you would use to spread a virus, and while this is essentially just to aid someone's Google ranking, the fact they felt they had to hide it in such a way makes me a little annoyed."
Inman says: "This is just a clever spin on linkbaiting that gives me a competitive edge. Placing links on websites to aid in search marketing efforts is nothing new." Yet the dividing line between fiendish money-making or clever marketing may never have been narrower.
Google obliterated the site from its search results
Earlier this year, Matthew Inman had achieved the notable distinction of vaulting a Web site called JustSayHi high into the results for a search on "online dating." But after he expanded his effort to new areas, Google obliterated the site from its search results.
no "seems" about it...
Trust your instinct, you are 100% correct.
It's who they are selling the intercepted data to, that is the real question.
Could be Obama, could be the banks, could be the oil companies, anyone who can gain something from spying on you.
Corporate governments are great for non-human people.
Who cares if Cisco spy on people, they paid the politicians already.
What was your plan ?
Subscriptions to spam or the box filled up to auto deletion ?
Cause you do know.... Cisco don't give a shit about PR ? (like Carreon)
An angry email will do fuck all to change them.
Unfortunately......
Even subscriptions or filling the email box will likely fail.(it's Cisco) They did screw over EVERY single Chinese internet user.
Interesting fact: There are way moaar internet users in China, than there are people in the U.S.A
Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
Rightly so. The guy is a pr disaster.
But law is not PR. (no matter how much I dislike him = not relevant to law)
also...
Inman is to me is like Fox news to the Daily Show!
(playing with peoples emotion for public opinion, ignoring facts in the process)
(wait..copying is "theft", forgot)
He did not donate $20,000 of his own money to charity. ( which would have won me over)
The +$1000 per day earner, viral marketeer and known link scammer, donated other peoples money to charity.
(all facts, but I will receive butthurt complaints for pointing them out)
Even a "referral ID" ad, will collect stats on the page where the user came from and track that user so as combat fraud, where a user keeps clicking the same links overe and over again to fake hits.
no need to react, a fact is a fact, not a troll.
An act will suit your issue better.
You are not defending techdirt. (your intentions are GOOD but misplaced) These are features you can opt out of.
Let people make up their own mind on the issue, after they have the facts.
The way you defend techdirt is...
Show people how to opt out of these features if THEY CHOOSE.
WE can't just dismiss or "rationalize away" facts, because they are uncomfortable. I wish we could, willful ignorance seems like a good disorder to acquire.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
The heartless one has a point
I agree with this, (again... flame me for it please, I know you wanna)
Hate funnyjunk because of Inmans words... Donate to charity to make all defense of funnyjunk seem unethical....seems legit! (that's what happened)
Proof of the effects (self centered version):
If I make ANY negative comment about Inman, the supporters come out in angry defense mode, in support of the poor, kind, charitable, defenseless cartoonist.
(that's a really accurate description...yeah..*cough *cough *bullshit *cough)
Also... You all forced me to marry him, remember ?... I am his wife, facepalm.gif
The BEST outcome of all this manufactured drama
1. "Carreon The Evilllll" ® wins against "Inman the manipulative" ™
2. The charities get the money.
3. The Inman supporters see Inman for real.
4. Carreon get's a bj from his wife.
( the real reason he is fighting so hard, I did promise you that bj IF you win sweetheart )
5. ???????
6. Profit!
TL;DR:
I am inviting you to hate me because.....
you give a fuck about a person that, you shouldn't give a fuck about.
PROTiP: Reply in angry comments only. ( moarr hate = moarr WiNcest amirite? )
BONUS POINTS: If you call me Carreon's wife and make a funny that makes US laugh.
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
If he bit off the bloggers ear ?
The guy is a savage !
Remind me never to cross him, I like my bum-hole the way it is.
On the post: Band Asks Fans To 'Donate Sounds' For Next Album
Hmmm... this could be fun.
On the post: ACTA Supporters In Europe Fighting To The Bitter End
A phrase that shows you hate people and love money.
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging & Digging: Inman And IndieGoGo Hit Back
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
The joys of being an SEO, you can bury negative stories about yourself.
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging & Digging: Inman And IndieGoGo Hit Back
dismissal of facts... ignorance or rational ?
The "poor defenseless Cartoonist" , that people gave a fuck about, is far from what they thought they gave a fuck about.
I had a good look into him.. BEFORE I gave a fuck about him.
I have been played before, by manipulation of conscience and emotion.
NOT this time.
what i saw...
Donating other peoples money to charity, to fight a defamation case is not logical, it serves only one purpose, manipulation of emotion.
He could easily afford to donate the money himself.
Among a shitload of other stuff...
Not a fuck was given from that day forth.
about.. "Inmans Personal Army"
People are fucking crazy "white knighting" for Inman , he is moar than capable of taking care of himself.
Go ahead and be his hero, like he gives a fuck about you.
On the post: You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers
Got to try
I mean...I really can't see Cisco giving a shit.
You can, and that's great, at least you are trying.(unlike me)
Honestly, I hope you are right and I am wrong.
But please don't let my opinion take away from your valued contribution.
If you are right, Cisco might listen and change, for the better of humanity.
And to other peeps lurking this thread..... email Cisco ( go go go)
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging & Digging: Inman And IndieGoGo Hit Back
Re: Re: Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
I posted it before, got a lot of hate and ignorance thrown my way, was even called Carreon ffs.
sauce: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/14/searchengines.blogging
Extract....
Google obliterated the site from its search results
On the post: Congress Plays See-No-Evil, Pretend-There's-No-Evil, Let-The-Evil-Continue With NSA Domestic Spying
surprised : level NOT
The spying contractors paying them, tell them what to say.
Sauce: http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indus.php?id=D&year=a
Now that is a DROP of lobbying in the "Ocean of Buying Politics"
http://www.opensecrets.org
"still completely perplexed at how anyone in Congress" ..bla..bla.. whatever ?
Bought and paid for... Bunch of puppets
On the post: You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers
buy a loophole.
Trust your instinct, you are 100% correct.
It's who they are selling the intercepted data to, that is the real question.
Could be Obama, could be the banks, could be the oil companies, anyone who can gain something from spying on you.
Corporate governments are great for non-human people.
Who cares if Cisco spy on people, they paid the politicians already.
About $2 million every year. ( the cost of your privacy to politicians )
http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000374
On the post: You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers
usually I would rejoyce you for it !
Subscriptions to spam or the box filled up to auto deletion ?
Cause you do know.... Cisco don't give a shit about PR ? (like Carreon)
An angry email will do fuck all to change them.
Unfortunately......
Even subscriptions or filling the email box will likely fail.(it's Cisco)
They did screw over EVERY single Chinese internet user.
Interesting fact:
There are way moaar internet users in China, than there are people in the U.S.A
On the post: Judge Slams Universal Music For Trying To 'Bamboozle' Court & Producers Over Eminem Royalties
moron - Ethics = Music Industry
There.... fixed it for ya !
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging & Digging: Inman And IndieGoGo Hit Back
Y is to .... how much of WHOSE money, did Inman donate to charity ?
But law is not PR. (no matter how much I dislike him = not relevant to law)
also...
Inman is to me is like Fox news to the Daily Show!
(playing with peoples emotion for public opinion, ignoring facts in the process)
(wait..copying is "theft", forgot)
He did not donate $20,000 of his own money to charity. ( which would have won me over)
The +$1000 per day earner, viral marketeer and known link scammer, donated other peoples money to charity.
(all facts, but I will receive butthurt complaints for pointing them out)
On the post: You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers
The Great Cisco Firewall of China
Thanks to Cisco, no one will ever hear them say it.
On the post: You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers
Great Cisco Firewall of China : Status Expansion
Selling Routers to China, for the ‘Great Firewall’, wasn't enough to deserve spite.
I wonder who this surveillance system is marketed to ?
Who is buying it ?
And who are the victims to be spied on ? (wait... that's us )
Looks like code for...
All your privacy are belong to Cisco *(people who buy it from Cisco)
Who are they selling that to again?
On the post: Announcing The Declaration Of Internet Freedom
aka...an advanced lie
You may end up in prison for over 100 years.
So... to be Legit !
1) Setup a "shell organization".(a non profit unregistered organization)
2) Create email account for your "shell organization"
3) ?????
4) Profit!
On the post: Announcing The Declaration Of Internet Freedom
Even a "referral ID" ad, will collect stats on the page where the user came from and track that user so as combat fraud, where a user keeps clicking the same links overe and over again to fake hits.
On the post: Announcing The Declaration Of Internet Freedom
How to cope being a pervert : )
On the post: Announcing The Declaration Of Internet Freedom
Reaction can be a positive reflex;
On the post: Announcing The Declaration Of Internet Freedom
Re: Re:
An act will suit your issue better.
You are not defending techdirt. (your intentions are GOOD but misplaced)
These are features you can opt out of.
Let people make up their own mind on the issue, after they have the facts.
The way you defend techdirt is...
Show people how to opt out of these features if THEY CHOOSE.
WE can't just dismiss or "rationalize away" facts, because they are uncomfortable.
I wish we could, willful ignorance seems like a good disorder to acquire.
Next >>