Well, it worked for online poker. Many former regulars don't have a clue a few sites still exist. I'd guess somebody saw that success, and reasoned if they can get rid of poker, they can get rid of anything else by targeting the financial institutes.
Never did bother to make the act (of playing poker) illegal.
So, this applies equally to the judges provided oversight to the DOJ, I gather. Politicians lies, judges know they lie, and that's the way it's gotta be.
My proposed conspiracy theory is that they well known guy who says it was an honest mistake may well have been enlisted to nefarious action 10 years ago, spending the first 8 years becoming a respected member of the community.
It's the government wasting our time, both directly and indirectly. You can continue to let them waste time, or express that you are not content with the status quo. Perhpas once they realize more people are angered by the website than are passified, they will stop the charade and take the website down, and go back to doing nothing in private rather than doing nothing in public, which, I guess, is the apparent purpose of the site.
Yes, we have to pass the laws so that unsuspecting children on the Internet will never be exposed to animal cruelty media. The innocence of the children must be preserved.
I wanted to read the source for "health benefits."
Well, "video games have health benefits for children", "benefits" links to an article citing only "video games can improve your health". Improve your health links to another trivial article citing only "video games that are supposed to improve your mental and physical health". Now, not only have we gone from an assertion of fact "do have benefits" and "can improve your health", we've fallen down to a mere "supposition." I suppose you know what they say about suppositions. Finally, "Mental and physical" links to http://www.beyond.com.au/. where the most meaningful science is found in the "Mythbusters 10-Year Anniversary" advertisement.
Please don't restate and overstatement of a supposition from a presumed source that is no longer linked. All tedium and no source makes Joey want to start cutting himself.
On the post: DOJ Morality Police May Be Behind Chase Closing Bank Accounts Of Adult Film Actors
Proof of concept; Black Friday.
Never did bother to make the act (of playing poker) illegal.
On the post: Five Illinois Cops Are Caught Lying On The Stand When Defense Produces A Recording Contradicting Their Testimony
Cops and Politicians
On the post: Video Games Do Cause Aggression... If They Suck Out Loud
On the post: Bullied Student Records Bullies, Gets Threatened With Felony Charges For Violating Wiretapping Law
Re:
On the post: UPDATED: NSA Denies Claims That It Knew About Heartbleed And Did Nothing
Re: Re:
On the post: Indiana Supreme Court Declares An Officer's Testimony Is More Reliable Than Video Evidence
Re: Re:
On the post: DailyDirt: Raw Eggs Are Healthy..?
On the post: Botch A Drug Raid? No Problem, Just Seal The Warrant, Citizen Complaint And Gag Order Itself
On the post: New We The People Petition Asks White House To Respond To Eligible Petitions Within 30 Days
Re:
On the post: USPTO: Again, Redskin Can't Be Trademarked Because It's A Racist Term
Re: But...
On the post: Green Scare: How Animal Rights Activists Are Being Branded 'Agro-Terrorists'
Re: But what about the children?
On the post: Some Chefs Still Insisting That Photographing Meals Steals Some Of Their Intellectual Property
Soul-stealing
On the post: Olympic Athletes Told To Cover Apple Logos On Devices So Apple Doesn't Get Any Free Promotion
No Logos
On the post: Guardian Releases Video From That Time Its Editors Were Forced To Destroy A Laptop That Had Snowden Documents
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: New York Times Suffers Redaction Failure, Exposes Name Of NSA Agent And Targeted Network In Uploaded PDF
Karma
On the post: USPTO: The Term 'Redskins' Is Offensive And Can't Be Trademarked
On the post: The FDA Wants To Dig Through Everyone's Stuff In Order To 'Monitor Online Sentiment'
Toss up
On the post: University Professor: Candy Crush Is Turning Children Into Obsessive Gamblers
Dear ed.
Well, "video games have health benefits for children", "benefits" links to an article citing only "video games can improve your health". Improve your health links to another trivial article citing only "video games that are supposed to improve your mental and physical health". Now, not only have we gone from an assertion of fact "do have benefits" and "can improve your health", we've fallen down to a mere "supposition." I suppose you know what they say about suppositions. Finally, "Mental and physical" links to http://www.beyond.com.au/. where the most meaningful science is found in the "Mythbusters 10-Year Anniversary" advertisement.
Please don't restate and overstatement of a supposition from a presumed source that is no longer linked. All tedium and no source makes Joey want to start cutting himself.
On the post: ACLU Sues City Of Omaha, 32 Police Officers For Use Of Excessive Force, Warrantless Search And Seizure
Standard Operating Procedure
On the post: Leading VC: NSA's Activities Are 'Corroding Silicon Valley'
Re:
Next >>