Olympic Athletes Told To Cover Apple Logos On Devices So Apple Doesn't Get Any Free Promotion
from the this-post-brought-to-you-by-olympic-censorship dept
For many years, we've pointed out the absolutely insane lengths the Olympics goes through to abuse trademark law to insane levels. It often requires host countries to pass special laws that give the Olympics powers that go beyond traditional trademark laws. And then, it does things like covering up the logos on toilets and sinks with tape, because those companies don't pay to be sponsors. It even launched an investigation at the last Olympics after it was discovered that athletes were having sex with non-sponsor condoms (Durex was the sponsor, but the condoms were not). Way back in 2006, we talked about how Apple was getting "free promotion" at the Olympics because tons of athletes were walking around using iPods with the iconic white earbuds, and reporters would ask them what they were listening to. We joked about the Olympic Committee telling athletes not to use Apple products.Except, our joke has almost become reality. Apparently, athletes are being told to cover the Apple logo on any electronics they have, because Samsung is the big consumer electronics sponsor for this Olympics, and the Olympic Committee can't let any brand possibly get free support. And, apparently, because the Olympic Committee thinks everyone in the world is a moron who won't recognize that a MacBook with a piece of tape over the Apple is still a MacBook.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: apple logo, olympics, sponsors, sponsorships
Companies: apple, samsung
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
When all you have is a hammer...
Since they apparently can't see anything but logos, trademarks and money, they probably assume everyone else is similarly blind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
looks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: looks
Now what gets me is why aren't the Olympic Committee members using Samsung products? I mean Samsung is sponsoring the events going on...
No...you see...the ONLY reason Samsung did this is because they had to pay for patent infringements on 3G antenna patents owned by Infineon..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Samsung
All Samsung TVs starting with model year 2012 have hidden cameras in the front bezels, so that they, and their affiliates, ad infinitum, can watch you in your own home.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Samsung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
But, OH, any corporation posting its URL here without Mike okaying it, that's SPAM! -- Same principle for the profit-making corporation known as Olympics. It's actually Mike who isn't consistent.
Here for your delectation is the tagline that started them all:
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! Old assertions prove new assertions! (1 of 200)
06:20:46[h-401-1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
I pushed the report button to censor your comment cuz I'm a kiddie ankle biter fanboy.
First step to recovery is to admit the problem.
But you too are to be censored for responding:
This is from one of the oh-so-reasonable Techdirt fanboys:
When will commentors learn? How long is it going to take for everyone who comments here to learn that by responding to OOTB that you're GIVING HIM EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS: attention!
Evidence here: "Yet they can't keep from commenting at me"
It's about time people learn to
REPORT OOTB AND EVERYONE WHO RESPONDS TO HIM
Those "conversations" add NOTHING OF VALUE to the site and are DRIVING PEOPLE AWAY FROM TECHDIRT (myself included soon if something isn't done to reign in this nuisance)
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140204/07522126085/new-zealand-spy-agency-deleted-evidence-about- its-illegal-spying-kim-dotcom.shtml#c341
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
Which is what you pursue with some glee
In truth we care little
Your ego is brittle
A vague amusement is all you'll be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
face, meet palm
So what are they supposed to do if one of the athletes is an Apple die-hard zealot who has the Apple logo tattooed somewhere on his body that can't be easily covered up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: face, meet palm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: face, meet palm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: face, meet palm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm
We can expect a similar story this year where the tape (mandated by the IOC, or chosen by the athlete, depending on what it's covering) becomes a bigger story than any logo would have been.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
Sincerely,
IOC Subcommittee on Squeezing Every Fucking Drop of Revenue Possible Out of This Noble Celebration of Sport (IOCSSEFDRPOTNCS)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does this mean we have to cover up five-ringed logos everywhere?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whack-a-mole REPOST! -- Good! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
But, OH, any corporation posting its URL here without Mike okaying it, that's SPAM! -- Same principle for the profit-making corporation known as Olympics. It's actually Mike who isn't consistent. \
All the news you saw last week on other sites, re-written to cherry pick points that fit Mike's agenda. (3 of 200)
06:39:58[h-522-4]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Help teh internets work around blockage!
Because kids here are trying to decide what you see -- classic censoring though they won't admit it, what censor does? -- I'm stirred to give those who don't want to be controlled by the little sneaks these tips so you don't have to put up with waste of time clicking to see all comments.
First, everyone should turn off javascript as matter of course. It's the main method of tracking, giving Google and other mega-corporations enough details to uniquely identify. -- Definitely also turn off cookies, rarely needed.
But NoScript makes it easy to allow websites on as-needed basis so don't lose any "function" (nearly always UN-necessary, only forced on you for tracking). You should be using Firefox, so install the "NoScript" extension:
http://noscript.net/
Be sure to remove Google and its parasites from NoScript whitelist! That's paid-for sneaking in of the WORST corporate SNOOPS.
For convenience only: Firefox extension PrefBar gives buttons to control cookies (again, those are "required" sheerly for tracking) and other items in unused space at top of browser. -- I've a button to toss my cookies the instant not required.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/prefbar/
To avoid most advertising and tracking, get and install "hosts" file from:
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
Very simple: automated for Windows; in Linux just replace the "hosts" file (somewhere that don't recall beyond "/etc": easily found).
I think it's necessary to add "cdn.techdirt.com" to the hosts file to avoid the click, and desirable in any case to not be advertised at. Also add "googleads.b.doubleclick.net", quite annoying.
Mike may sell a few T-shirts with Techdirt logo, but I bet his lunch dates are open. (5 of 200)
06:42:37[h-765-1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
No kids here. That's probably one of the many reasons you get blocked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
If you kids can't stand to skip over a little bit of text, that speaks volumes. I'm just on a tear here so that reasonable people won't be fooled by lying little kids who claim they're for "free speech" but actually are tyrants to extent of their "report" button power.
"The Techdirt Community" forbids you to reply to me. No "freedom of association" here. You must accept the Group Will of these "libertarians". (201 of 201)
07:25:09[i-626-0]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
You realize that with your repetitive, ignorant, off topic bullshit you would even fail the turing test?
In university I had conversations with scripts that were more lifelike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
"The Techdirt Community" forbids you to reply to me. No "freedom of association" here. You must accept the Group Will of these "libertarians". (201 of 201)
07:21:50[i-442-5]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Help teh internets work around blockage!
> @ "DannyB" -- QUIT READING AND REPLYING TO MY POSTS!
Here's an idea.
If you don't want me to read your posts, let along reply to them . . .
THEN DON'T POST THEM!
It would make you happy.
It would make me happy.
It would make everyone happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about Android logos?
Do you need to cover the screen when your BRAND-X laptop, phone or tablet is rebooted because a logo appears?
What about the Microsoft logo? Start menu button? What about icons on the desktop that are logos of various software companies or logos?
What if a paperback book has a logo of the publisher on its cover?
What about logos or brand names on athletes' luggage?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about Android logos?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about Android logos?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No good answer
Make me king for a day, and the policy would be that logos could be freely displayed on items that 1. Were paid for by the owner, and 2. The owner did not and will not receive payment for displaying them.
You bought an Apple laptop - OK
Apple gave you a laptop - Not OK
You have an Apple sticker on your clipboard - OK
Apple paid you to put a sticker there - Not OK
However, the Olympic Committee almost certainly accepted additional money to keep any other logo out of sight, so that's all out the window.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No good answer
I've alway wondered why the Olympics don't just collect a percentage of money athletes make from their sponsors? Then you can do commercials, boards, etc, etc and not worry so much about what the athletes say or do...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new, but sort of dumb...
If I was an Apple marketing person, I would simply give out free iPods and laugh about it. It certainly gave the condom market in Australia a boost 9)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nothing new, but sort of dumb...
How about wearing a t-shirt that loudly proclaims:
Nothing I have is a product of any sponsor of this organized aporting event.
Small print: that way I don't have to worry about disclaiming or covering every individual logo. Just disclaim them all at once, loudly. (If you sponsor the Olympics, I won't buy your product -- to simplify my life.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Samsung could not have entered into contract with Committee, wich gives away rights of third parties. And no, Olympics are not private for this purpose.
If we allow that legal crap, then next thing you know Mr Lee Kun-hee will usurp right to eat you dog by signing Samsung with Google. I say: Kun change you name to Woo De Fuck. Because that's what you are.
BTW, for the past decade this is SOP amongst evil multinationals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next joke to become a reality next Olympics
Well hey, at least they're just saying to cover up the logo's. It's not like they're seizing all the apple products as if they were illegal goods. And it's like they're removing the toilets and sinks from non-sponsers simply because they know a piece of tape isn't good enough.
That could NEVER happen, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The joke's on you
This is actually a perfect recreation of how the original olympics were back in ancient Greece. They didn't care for Trojans then, either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Help teh internets work around blockage!
Because kids here are trying to decide what you see -- classic censoring though they won't admit it, what censor does? -- I'm stirred to give those who don't want to be controlled by the little sneaks these tips so you don't have to put up with waste of time clicking to see all comments.
First, everyone should turn off javascript as matter of course. It's the main method of tracking, giving Google and other mega-corporations enough details to uniquely identify. -- Definitely also turn off cookies, rarely needed.
But NoScript makes it easy to allow websites on as-needed basis so don't lose any "function" (nearly always UN-necessary, only forced on you for tracking). You should be using Firefox, so install the "NoScript" extension:
http://noscript.net/
Be sure to remove Google and its parasites from NoScript whitelist! That's paid-for sneaking in of the WORST corporate SNOOPS.
For convenience only: Firefox extension PrefBar gives buttons to control cookies (again, those are "required" sheerly for tracking) and other items in unused space at top of browser. -- I've a button to toss my cookies the instant not required.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/prefbar/
To avoid most advertising and tracking, get and install "hosts" file from:
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
Very simple: automated for Windows; in Linux just replace the "hosts" file (somewhere that don't recall beyond "/etc": easily found).
I think it's necessary to add "cdn.techdirt.com" to the hosts file to avoid the click, and desirable in any case to not be advertised at. Also add "googleads.b.doubleclick.net", quite annoying.
Where the fanboys troll the site with vulgar ad hom, and call anyone disagreeing "trolls"! (7 of 201)
07:20:43[i-401-7]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2nd whack-a-mole REPOST! -- And just exactly WHICH corporations do YOU allow to use Techdirt to promote?
But, OH, any corporation posting its URL here without Mike okaying it, that's SPAM! -- Same principle for the profit-making corporation known as Olympics. It's actually Mike who isn't consistent.
Visitors, you too will get this if dare disagree with The Mike: "REPORT OOTB AND EVERYONE WHO RESPONDS TO HIM"
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140204/07522126085/new-zealand-spy-agency-deleted-evidence-about- its-illegal-spying-kim-dotcom.shtml#c341 (196 of 201)
07:27:11[i-730-2]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cover it!
Anyone who supports or watches the Olympics supports this sort of fascist over controlling zealotry, in which case - reap what you sow.
Personally, I've refused to support the Money enterprise that stole the name Olympics for some time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cover it!
There's the idea. I declare it public domain. Someone, maybe near Sochi, take it to the bank.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cover it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grow up Olympic Committee!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course it's equally possible...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know things are bad when....
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/aug/07/london-2012-condoms-olympic-village?CMP=twt_g u
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know things are bad when....
This is madness, we all know copyright lasts life + 70 years and will continue to be extended into the future to keep Mickey Mouse covered, so there is no way that the copyright on anything produced in the last 100 years could have actually "expired".
Typical lying mainstream media trying to subtly convince the public that copyright can actually expire....
Silly Rabbit, Trix are for kids
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know things are bad when....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple Tape
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple Tape
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Olympic trademarks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Olympic trademarks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Article corrected...
http://www.macrumors.com/2014/02/06/sochi-athletes-may-use-iphones/
Eric
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Depends on how big of a hurry these morons are in. This is the Olympics after all, so they could be in quite the hurry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Logos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Logos
I used to make it a point to address people wearing that ugly Hilfiger stuff with the name in that supersized font as "Tommy", and then ask "Well why do you have his shirt?"
I also questioned, back when this first started (70s? 80s?), what I was supposed to get in return for the free advertising. Somehow, the explanation, that I got some kind of 'cool cred' from people who judged such things based on the brand of clothing a person wore seemed absolutely paradoxical.
And so have avoided heavily logo'd clothing ever since.*
*-esp. the 'swoosh'. Somehow, overpriced products endorsed by ridiculously overpaid athletes, who were then given more huge sums of money for a 'contribution' to the product which in no way enhanced its utility or quality, while the people who actually produced the products were paid slave wages seemed...ummm...unsavory? contradictory? immoral? COMPLETELY, GLARINGLY, TOTALLY WRONG, maybe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No Logos
I used to as well, sometimes still ask others, but I think you have to have the tattoo as well, on your forehead or both cheeks, to get paid. I should also point out that it needs to be on your face. I had inked a G and O on my left cheek and GLE on my right, but google wouldn't pay me as it wasn't facial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: No Logos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No Logos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if you must cover up the logos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]