Anyway, I guess we're now going to see if GETTR gets to speed run
the content moderation learning curve the same way Parler did
Yup, at the latest when some well-meaning trolls sign up under popular right wing weirdos' nicks including their imported followers and use this semblance of legitimacy spouting off brand messags mocking Drumpf, QAnon and Co.
And, indeed, it is true that there is a world of difference, but the
important point is that it's not easy to tell that difference when
you're a content moderation reviewer just looking at the content.
But we can certainly rest assured the moderators who banned RWW also banned each and all referenced media from that channel. Right?
Yup. Reminds me of Apple's oh so hyped anouncement of the Beatles FINALLY being on iTunes (and U2 being force fed to uninterested customers). Way to misjudge your demographic.
And, the fact is, there are almost no sites out there (despite what
ignorant people are screaming) that do any moderation based on
political affiliation.
Other than Parler of course who banned (leftist) posters who were rightfully mocking the dear whiner-in-chief (aka the lame duck).
Fat chance! The lame duck whiner-in-chief just can't get out of his skin. Think about: if he had simply had handled the pandemic reasonably well, the left would have had much more problems competing for votes.
On the post: Former Trump Aide Launches Twitter Clone, That Seems To Yank A Ton Of Data Right Out Of Twitter; Already Has First Content Moderation Crisis
Yup, at the latest when some well-meaning trolls sign up under popular right wing weirdos' nicks including their imported followers and use this semblance of legitimacy spouting off brand messags mocking Drumpf, QAnon and Co.
On the post: Once Again: Content Moderation Often Mistakes Reporting On Bad Behavior With Celebrating Bad Behavior
But we can certainly rest assured the moderators who banned RWW also banned each and all referenced media from that channel. Right?
On the post: Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin Sentenced To Twenty-Two Years For Killing George Floyd
Good.
On the post: 2nd Circuit Upholds Non-Monetary Sanctions Against Copyright Troll Richard Liebowitz
Re: Couldn't have happend to a more deserving man
Which is the real problem here. Why the hell would they let run this clown rampant for so long? They only have themselves to blame.
On the post: Ringo Starr Drops Trademark Challenge Against 'Ring O' Sex Toy
Re:
Yup. Reminds me of Apple's oh so hyped anouncement of the Beatles FINALLY being on iTunes (and U2 being force fed to uninterested customers). Way to misjudge your demographic.
On the post: Florida Steps Up To Defend Its Unconstitutional Social Media Law And It's Every Bit As Terrible As You'd Imagine
Re: Re:
Does this include the outrageous lies he keeps pulling out of his fat butt?
On the post: Florida Steps Up To Defend Its Unconstitutional Social Media Law And It's Every Bit As Terrible As You'd Imagine
Re: Re: Platforms Can't Claim the 1st
Why would he? He still hasn't answer ANY of you guys asking why corporations should be forced to host speech they disagree with.
On the post: DOJ Seizes Iranian News Org Websites; Raising Many Questions
Yep, look no further than how China adapted to the US copyright and patents shenanigans.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: YouTube Relocates Video Accused Of Inflated Views (2014)
Speaking of talent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1LhC1zGouc
On the post: If David Cicilline Gets His Way; It Would Destroy Content Moderation
Re: Re:
And why not? After enjoying the 2021 Texas power crisis you guys seem to be having fun with levee systems. Well done!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/texas-levees-hurricane-trump-wal l-b1862898.html
On the post: If David Cicilline Gets His Way; It Would Destroy Content Moderation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Been there, done that. Too much hate and BS.
On the post: Senator Wicker Introduces Bill To Guarantee The Internet Sucks
Re:
Said some rando schmuck on the Interwebz. Impressive.
On the post: Senator Wicker Introduces Bill To Guarantee The Internet Sucks
Other than Parler of course who banned (leftist) posters who were rightfully mocking the dear whiner-in-chief (aka the lame duck).
On the post: Facebook Says Trump's 'Indefinite' Suspension Is Now Two Years Off The Platform, And Then It'll See If He'll Behave
Re: Re:
Well, by properly phrasing it the death cult still would have counted it as a win against the libs, so yeah.
On the post: Facebook Says Trump's 'Indefinite' Suspension Is Now Two Years Off The Platform, And Then It'll See If He'll Behave
Re: Oh look just in time for the next election, what a coinciden
Just look at Elon and the SEC.
On the post: CNET Amplifies FCC's Carr's Attempt To Force 'Big Tech' To Pay 'Big Telecom' For No Reason
Re: so....
So, bits are a limited supply, such as water? Really?
On the post: Facebook Says Trump's 'Indefinite' Suspension Is Now Two Years Off The Platform, And Then It'll See If He'll Behave
Fat chance! The lame duck whiner-in-chief just can't get out of his skin. Think about: if he had simply had handled the pandemic reasonably well, the left would have had much more problems competing for votes.
On the post: Stanford Federalist Society Tries To 'Cancel' Law Student For Satirical Email About Josh Hawley
Re: "Satire" as legal defense is getting out of reach
Even if that were true that would be no (legal) reason whatsoever to stop him from graduating, right?
On the post: Trump Bans Himself From His Own Blog; Upset That Everyone Mocked Its Terrible Traffic
Yet more proof that Twitter et al. should have banned the lame duck whiner-in-chief way, way earlier.
On the post: Senator Chris Coons Says No One Who Has Ever Criticized Intellectual Property Can Head The Patent Office
Re: Re:
Given your senseless drivel you're definitely not smart enough to do that. Pass.
Next >>