Re: Whoops, you're supposed to keep that part silent guys
It's also funny to consider they admit to NOT removing "content that attacks someone based on race, sex, sexual orientation or religion." leaving out political affiliations. So you can be damn sure they'll still censor critics of the whiner-in-chief lame duck president.
You've literally had a Democrat Congressman be a guest editor.
How many Republican Congressmen have you had? Zero.
And why is that? Because they are rambling idiots that live in their own faux reality. We've already got enough of those in the form of commenters such as yourself.
Again, with the exception of a possibly ill-conceived
advertisement campaign a few years back, this company is an
absolute media darling with a fair amount of good will built up for
itself.
Oh really? I thought they'd became widely laughed at for the outrageous pricing on their bikes but okay, there's also people who bought a Juicero so what do I know...
On the post: Senator Chris Coons Says No One Who Has Ever Criticized Intellectual Property Can Head The Patent Office
Re: Re:
You can consider yourself lucky you've got the right skin colour then, huh?
On the post: Verizon Forces Users On To More Expensive Broadband Plans Just To Get $50 Covid Subsidy
which was totally necessary cause obviously we couldn't have thought ourselves that this would be considered a bad move.
On the post: Parler Was Allowed Back In The Apple App Store Because It Will Block 'Hate Speech,' But Only When Viewed Through Apple Devices
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Blind Spot
Of course I do.
On the post: Parler Was Allowed Back In The Apple App Store Because It Will Block 'Hate Speech,' But Only When Viewed Through Apple Devices
Re: Whoops, you're supposed to keep that part silent guys
It's also funny to consider they admit to NOT removing "content that attacks someone based on race, sex, sexual orientation or religion." leaving out political affiliations. So you can be damn sure they'll still censor critics of the whiner-in-chief lame duck president.
On the post: Parler Was Allowed Back In The Apple App Store Because It Will Block 'Hate Speech,' But Only When Viewed Through Apple Devices
Re: Re: Re: Blind Spot
And why is that? Because they are rambling idiots that live in their own faux reality. We've already got enough of those in the form of commenters such as yourself.
On the post: Parler Was Allowed Back In The Apple App Store Because It Will Block 'Hate Speech,' But Only When Viewed Through Apple Devices
Nah, they'll most likely view the hate flag as a badge of honor and actively write/seek out such posts.
On the post: Twitch Yanks Advertising Revenue From Popular 'Hot Tub Streamer' With No Warning Or Dialogue
Re:
Considering this as sexual could be part of the problem.
On the post: FBI Got Access To Sci-Hub Founder's Apple Account
Re:
And profiteer's like Elsevier who don't contribute to anything, are still just that.
On the post: Michigan Legislator With No Understanding Of The 1st Amendment Wants To Fine Fact Checkers For Pointing Out His Lies
You first, cupcake!
On the post: Why Is Wired So Focused On Misrepresenting Section 230?
Re:
So, how would Twitter go about taking stuff down from other sites? Or can you point to ANY instance of Twitter hosting it?
Yeah, thought so, genius.
On the post: Bad Section 230 Bills Come From Both Sides Of The Aisle: Schakowsky/Castor Bill Would Be A Disaster For The Open Internet
Re:
Same as the person who crafted this bill.
On the post: Trump Shows Why He Doesn't Need Twitter Or Facebook, As He Launches His Own Twitter-Like Microblog
Re: Blogging is back
Yeah, I'm ready to fire up my newsreader anytime.
On the post: Wired's Big 230 Piece Has A Narrative To Tell
Re: Re:
Right, but just like all the trolls that keep flooding this forum you need to counter the BS so the feeble minded don't believe it too easily.
On the post: Wired's Big 230 Piece Has A Narrative To Tell
Well, good that your article
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/
Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act
is not. I assume, someone already tweeted it at him?!
On the post: Peloton Is Having A Rough Week: Product Safety Recalls And News Of Customer Data Exposure
Oh really? I thought they'd became widely laughed at for the outrageous pricing on their bikes but okay, there's also people who bought a Juicero so what do I know...
On the post: Trump Shows Why He Doesn't Need Twitter Or Facebook, As He Launches His Own Twitter-Like Microblog
Yep, par for the course for the lame duck whiner-in-chief.
On the post: Disney Got Itself A 'If You Own A Themepark...' Carveout From Florida's Blatantly Unconstitutional Social Media Moderation Bill
Re: "mostly those controlled by angry, ignorant Republicans"
Or what? You assclown will spew more bullshit? Bring it on.
On the post: Senator Marco Rubio: Speech I Disagree With Is Pollution
Reps holding out their hands expecting kickbacks to look the other way?
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
And remember that the police has been shown how it can be done:
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/watch-swedish-police-show-nypd/
On the post: Morrissey Thinks Free Speech No Longer Exists Because He Can't Sue The Simpsons For Satirizing Him
Re: Re: Who has a link?
https://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones
Next >>