Per what I saw on psx scene (link to their article maybed posted somewhere below if it succeeds moderation)..
The official document basically states that he is not to attempt to gain "unauthorized access" to *any* Sony product - nor assist others in doing so.
He has also updated his personal blog stating that he now is boycotting all Sony products, so I would guess he intends to never touch one again as a result of this injunction.
Why can't the public receive unrestricted access to government-stored emails > 6 months? The infrastructure is paid for by taxpayers - we should gain access to that information as a result.
Honestly, of the 2 key pieces of information specified, I think only #1 is an absolute must for an open and honest "pay what you want" project of this type: How many minimum orders you need, and what amount you must raise to cover your cost.
With these two pieces of information available, people will often go into "Co-op" mode and are willing to pay more than the bare minimum. The figures must be honest.
With tangible goods, one has to be prepared to make no profit up front - with the hope that they can recoup the cost later via retail sales once word gets out about their product offering from those who got in on the deal.
With virtual goods, the sky's the limit - once you hit your minimum number of orders and recoup your initial cost, one could potentially assume that any further money received is "pure profit".
On the post: Sony Settles PS3 Jailbreaking Lawsuit Against Geohot
Re: Re:
The official document basically states that he is not to attempt to gain "unauthorized access" to *any* Sony product - nor assist others in doing so.
He has also updated his personal blog stating that he now is boycotting all Sony products, so I would guess he intends to never touch one again as a result of this injunction.
On the post: Sony Settles PS3 Jailbreaking Lawsuit Against Geohot
PSX-Scene has documents
http://psx-scene.com/forums/f6/settlement-george-hotz-case-84881/
On the post: Copyright Fight Over GoDaddy CEO Shooting An Elephant?
Agenda
Since Godaddy participates often in these seizures, they probably know how easy it is to use this as censorship of people you don't like..
On the post: Apparently Russia's President Gets Angry When You Hit His Blog With A Denial Of Service Attack
Re: Re: Which would you rather have?
On the post: Apparently Russia's President Gets Angry When You Hit His Blog With A Denial Of Service Attack
Which would you rather have?
Or nobody visiting it at all?
On the post: Feds: 4th Amendment Shouldn't Apply To Online Emails Because... That Would Make Us Have To Work Harder
Public should get government emails > 180 days
On the post: More Data And Thoughts On The Pay What You Want For A Stylus Experiment
Only one key piece of info needed
With these two pieces of information available, people will often go into "Co-op" mode and are willing to pay more than the bare minimum. The figures must be honest.
With tangible goods, one has to be prepared to make no profit up front - with the hope that they can recoup the cost later via retail sales once word gets out about their product offering from those who got in on the deal.
With virtual goods, the sky's the limit - once you hit your minimum number of orders and recoup your initial cost, one could potentially assume that any further money received is "pure profit".
On the post: Which Would You Rather Have: 100,000 Unauthorized Downloads Of Your Music... Or None?
Re:
Next >>