If it was me, I'd store large quantities of bitcoin offline in multiple wallets (which the guy with 25,000 of them apparently did not bother to do), and then only as much as I need when I'm certain my machine is clean.
I don't know about you, but I keep my money in multiple locations - some easy to get to (my actual wallet), some in a safe (locked in my house), and some in my bank account (obviously protected by the institution itself).
That way if someone mugs me in the street, they only get what's in my wallet at the time. If someone breaks into my house (and somehow figures out my safe combination - perhaps because they somehow saw me use it through a window or something), they still don't get what's in my savings account.
Anyone can do the same with bitcoin, they just tend to be lazy because it's "convenient" to just keep it all in one place, on their trusty, secure computer.
It's important to note that the bitcoin software is not necessarily a single program - anyone can create their own "secure" bitcoin program if they want (it's open source)... so this problem is likely to solve itself as people actually care enough to do it.
There's no central authority involved here, so trying to say what they "should do" is sort of pointless, as no one person, or group of people is necessarily responsible for how bitcoin is stored or managed.
We're talking about a file on your hard drive here... it doesn't matter if you password protect the file - once malware is in place, you just throw a keylogger on to watch everything the user types.
You can always encrypt the wallet file, store it offline, or send your bitcoin to a website that "stores" them for you (mybitcoin.com for example)... but that doesn't stop the fact that stored bitcoin can be taken from your machine if you don't protect it somehow.
That's my understanding as well - that the bitcoin block is untraceable once it leaves a person's wallet - but you can track who is sending/receiving them.
That does little good if 25,000 people receive a bitcoin from this thief - it doesn't mean that those 25,000 people become thieves, just as a store clerk receiving a stolen $20 bill in return for groceries doesn't make them a thief.
Well obviously, these sites are infringing the copyright and trademarks of the U.S. Government - and are counterfeiting their seizure page... so the logical conclusion is that they should be seized!
I ceased to own a cell phone in 2005, initially for financial reasons, but ultimately I found it quite uplifting to rid myself of an always-on "gadget".
The suggestion that it can cause cancer only solidified my stance on cell phone (dis)use.
My wife also neglected to renew her cell phone plan, and instead got a "pay-as-you-go" phone. This tends to reduce how much she uses the phone, but still keeps it in the car for emergencies, or whenever we go out of town. I've borrowed her phone once or twice when going on business trips, but I hate having to use it.
Something tells me it's quite a bit different when you enter an agreement like this and submit it to a court for approval and dismissal of a lawsuit...
Because the primary point of checkpoints are to prevent people from drinking and driving in the first place - if they know they're likely to encounter one, they are probably less likely to drink and drive.
Sometimes people just need a reminder that what they're about to do is not only dangerous, but also illegal, and they're gonna go to jail if they get caught.
The people who are gonna do it anyway probably won't care.
On the post: If Your Comment Section Is Awesome, It's Your Community's Fault
Re: Comments and Trolls
Positive reinforcement works better in most cases.
On the post: Capcom's Resident Evil DRM Is Evil: You Get To Play The Game Once And That's It
Re: Re:
On the post: Capcom's Resident Evil DRM Is Evil: You Get To Play The Game Once And That's It
Re:
On the post: New Malware Targets Bitcoins To Steal
Re: Re: Re:
I don't know about you, but I keep my money in multiple locations - some easy to get to (my actual wallet), some in a safe (locked in my house), and some in my bank account (obviously protected by the institution itself).
That way if someone mugs me in the street, they only get what's in my wallet at the time. If someone breaks into my house (and somehow figures out my safe combination - perhaps because they somehow saw me use it through a window or something), they still don't get what's in my savings account.
Anyone can do the same with bitcoin, they just tend to be lazy because it's "convenient" to just keep it all in one place, on their trusty, secure computer.
On the post: New Malware Targets Bitcoins To Steal
Re: Re: Re:
It's important to note that the bitcoin software is not necessarily a single program - anyone can create their own "secure" bitcoin program if they want (it's open source)... so this problem is likely to solve itself as people actually care enough to do it.
There's no central authority involved here, so trying to say what they "should do" is sort of pointless, as no one person, or group of people is necessarily responsible for how bitcoin is stored or managed.
On the post: New Malware Targets Bitcoins To Steal
Re:
You can always encrypt the wallet file, store it offline, or send your bitcoin to a website that "stores" them for you (mybitcoin.com for example)... but that doesn't stop the fact that stored bitcoin can be taken from your machine if you don't protect it somehow.
On the post: New Malware Targets Bitcoins To Steal
Re: Re: Tracibility
That does little good if 25,000 people receive a bitcoin from this thief - it doesn't mean that those 25,000 people become thieves, just as a store clerk receiving a stolen $20 bill in return for groceries doesn't make them a thief.
On the post: China Seizes Websites, Clamps Down On Speech... Uses Copyright Infringement As The Excuse
Did they use the ICE seizure page?
On the post: Is Pretending Your Domain Name Has Been Seized By ICE The New Rickroll?
Re: Hmmm
http://192.168.1.255
Which is actually shorter anyway - and avoids a trip to a DNS server at all :)
On the post: Mixed Messages: US Talks Of Cleaning Up 'Rogue' Internet... While Underwriting Censorship-Proof Shadow Internet
Freedom for all but ourselves...
On the post: Is Pretending Your Domain Name Has Been Seized By ICE The New Rickroll?
Re:
On the post: While Sony Sues Modders, Samsung Sends Them Devices To Mod Faster
Re: I still hope Sony will do the right thing
On the post: Would People Stop Using Mobile Phones If More Evidence Shows Them To Be Carcinogenic?
Re:
Cell phones have a range of several miles - that's actually a quite large difference in power.
On the post: Would People Stop Using Mobile Phones If More Evidence Shows Them To Be Carcinogenic?
Already stopped, more or less...
The suggestion that it can cause cancer only solidified my stance on cell phone (dis)use.
My wife also neglected to renew her cell phone plan, and instead got a "pay-as-you-go" phone. This tends to reduce how much she uses the phone, but still keeps it in the car for emergencies, or whenever we go out of town. I've borrowed her phone once or twice when going on business trips, but I hate having to use it.
On the post: Is Influence A Number... And Is It Based On Twitter?
Ah damn..
I apparently don't have a twitter or facebook account. Guess I should go shoot myself.
On the post: Colorado Judge Puts All Righthaven Cases On Hold
Re: Re: Re: Question
On the post: Colorado Judge Puts All Righthaven Cases On Hold
Re: Question
On the post: Politician Grandstanding About Police Checkpoint App Results In Doubling Of Sales
Re:
Sometimes people just need a reminder that what they're about to do is not only dangerous, but also illegal, and they're gonna go to jail if they get caught.
The people who are gonna do it anyway probably won't care.
On the post: Patent Troll Lodsys: All We Want Is 0.575% Of The Entire Mobile In-App Payment Ecosystem, Is That So Wrong?
Haiku syllable count percentage?
How poetic of them.
On the post: Gene Weingarten Shows How To Respond To Bogus Trademark Threats: Stetson(R) Hats Suck
Weenis isn't registered..
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4006:enf8pr.1.1
So at the most he can only request that it be written as weenis™
I know...details.
Next >>