That Anonymous Coward (profile), 23 Sep 2021 @ 1:22pm
Re:
"Oh, and the excuse about carrying a rapist's baby is just that, and it ignores (just like those who push it) the very real fact that the baby is an innocent."
Willing to bet there were at least a couple innocents in the 675,000 people closed minded religious zealots helped kill by denying science, but y'all seem to have no problem with killing them.
"But it's also wrong to demonize and belittle anyone who feels that some form of regulation is in order, though not necessarily outright prohibition, as I know that would only make things worse."
Then write a law that is just as overbearing and controlling toward the men who create these magic lives & then walk the fsck away or admit you just want to make sure you can force women who dare to have sex carry babies to term so you can then ignore the child ending up in poverty & then tut tut tut about how she should try harder while screaming you will not pay a cent more in taxes to support her bastard child.
No matter how the fuck you feel about it, why the hell do you have the right to tell other people they can't make their own decisions?
All of the money wasted on bad laws & fake clinics... why the hell haven't y'all made something to replace abortion, beyond forcing a woman to have the child?
Y'all claim there are people ready to adopt blah blah blah, well how much research have you put in transferring an embryo to a new host as a win win option for both sides?
Because YOU believe it is a child and YOU do not want them to be aborted still does not mean you have a right to tell someone else how to live their life.
Put your money where your mouth is, develop an alternative to abortion that meets your requirements rather than keep screaming that you get to decide the fate of other people who are supposed to have the same fucking rights you have but try to deny them having at every turn.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 23 Sep 2021 @ 1:18am
Re: Re:
Curse both of you... I was just coming to make a comment about perhaps we shouldn't praise kids over doing things so much... it appears if they peak as a teen they just devolve into suing anyone who says mean things about them while reliving their long past glory days.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Sep 2021 @ 3:29pm
Re: Re:
Last I checked, she has a Constitutional right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
I do enjoy how you seem to think that women can get knocked up without the assistance of another party, why is there no demand that men always use contraception?
You seem to think it is ONLY the womans responsibility & her inability to use it means she is incapable of voting.
You might be shocked to know that contraception isn't 100%.
You might be shocked to learn that a womans 'right' to get those 16 forms of birth control can be limited if some asshat has a 'religious' reason to deny her access to it.
You might be shocked that only these 'religious' types get to demand how their tax dollars can not be spent, pretty sure Quakers would LOVE the right to deny their tax dollars be spent buying the tools of war but they don't have that right.
You might be shocked to learn that Planned Parenthood is often the only source of contraception & women's health services in many areas but these 'religious' types often stand outside and harass them as baby killers because PP offers among ALL of the services they offer abortion.
You might be shocked to learn to learn that allegedly educated people believe that an ectopic pregnancy can be "relocated" when there is not way do do that.
You might be shocked to learn more money is poured into making sure a woman can't make her own decisions than into making sure that a man actually has to take responsibility for the child he helped create.
When was the last time a religious' group showed up to picket a man for not taking care of his responsibility in bringing a child into the world?
You are not very good at the whole trolling thing, springing to the whole we should kill wives and girlfriends comparing their worth to a bundle of cells.
They are not killing babies. They are killing a parasitic growth that they do not want. Its not a person, its not a baby, its a bundle of cells. You attempt to frame it this way really suggests you shouldn't be taken seriously on any topic.
Millions of children in this nation went to bed hungry last night, and you care more about adding more children to suffer to the world than lifting a finger to help them once they are "born".
Actual children are dying as state agencies fail them, but you're to busy demanding a woman pop out a child for the sin of daring to have had sex outside of wedlock than holding the people who failed children who ended up missing/dead responsible.
In closing... GFY.
I'd worry about children you might bring into the world but your personality makes it clear you won't be reproducing without the use of chemical inducements to make the women miss your sparkling personality.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Sep 2021 @ 1:30pm
Re:
If only there was a min penalty for violating a constitutional right they could have found representation and slapped these slack jawed idiots down before it got to this point.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Sep 2021 @ 1:17pm
"“I think we need to evaluate what the court is doing on its own terms.”"
And what we've learned is the court will jump through hoops to speed 'religious' based complaints & other rights don't matter as much.
The fact they might have to wear a mask or limit the number of people in the church was so important you gave it the rocket docket.
A woman facing having to carry her rapists baby to term & face busybodies filing lawsuits to screw her over that little bit more wasn't important enough.
Someone looks sideways at a gun, rocket docket to defend the 2nd Amendment.
The court is playing favorites, and while they pretend its just important Constitutional questions, its really odd how many cases they take up are only important to a small loud religious minority of white people getting their way even in the face of causing harm & death to other citizens the court has made clear are not as important.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Sep 2021 @ 1:07pm
I must be a super duper hacker...
I've opened and repaired several iPods all on my own.
I've replaced batteries, reseated connections, replaced hard drives, switched them to running on flash memory to extend battery life.
Perhaps 4th Gen was the best gen... before the glue & needing super secret special tools to try and open them to fix simple things.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Sep 2021 @ 11:40pm
"had blacklisted about 230 beer and wine brands since 2002 for having labels or names that offended the board's sensibilities."
So they didn't sue for violating their 1st Amendment rights why??
Its not pretty or easy to do, but being able to show a long term pattern of the board using their sensibilities rather than actual legal thingys... I'm thinking many 0's on a check.
Someone might want to inform the board that polygamy is illegal, but violating the Constitution is much worse.
" the fact that it is literally legal to marry your first cousin in North Carolina."
lightbulb I think I know why the board is like this. :)
Waves hi to Marc and T. Greg incase they wander by cause they'd talk to me on twitter.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Sep 2021 @ 5:07pm
"This is its formal slang for harassing residents until (in the office's own words) "they sue or move." "
You knew you were doing wrong.
You cheered you were doing wrong.
You violated FERPA.
You decided that people with any connection to a crime, even if they were a victim, were bad people & you needed to run them out of town.
You are the poster child for the racist, intolerant, and ignorant bullies who seek to have power over others to make you feel better about yourself.
You tell other citizens you only go after the "bad people", but the only bad person in this town is you and your officers who punish people over & over.
You never accept they paid for their 'crimes' & keep pushing them to where they will do something wrong again so you can proclaim victory.
Its a pity you won't rot in jail & you won't have to repay the funds you misused from your own pocket.
I do hope the DoJ will look at those you were working with because any humans telling you this was the best course of actions & violating federal law is okay because you're doing it for the greater good should never be allowed in an oversight position over even a shopping cart.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Sep 2021 @ 10:44am
Re: Re:
It was pretty standard in the 1700 & 1800 hundreds.
Y'all keep forgetting I'm immortal and been watching humanity slipping back towards the cesspool they were born out of.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Sep 2021 @ 10:41am
Senator from Virginia blows the dog whistle as hard as he can to distract from the Jan 6th insurrection & the recent 'but we don't lock up white people this way' festival.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re:
"Oh, and the excuse about carrying a rapist's baby is just that, and it ignores (just like those who push it) the very real fact that the baby is an innocent."
Willing to bet there were at least a couple innocents in the 675,000 people closed minded religious zealots helped kill by denying science, but y'all seem to have no problem with killing them.
"But it's also wrong to demonize and belittle anyone who feels that some form of regulation is in order, though not necessarily outright prohibition, as I know that would only make things worse."
Then write a law that is just as overbearing and controlling toward the men who create these magic lives & then walk the fsck away or admit you just want to make sure you can force women who dare to have sex carry babies to term so you can then ignore the child ending up in poverty & then tut tut tut about how she should try harder while screaming you will not pay a cent more in taxes to support her bastard child.
No matter how the fuck you feel about it, why the hell do you have the right to tell other people they can't make their own decisions?
All of the money wasted on bad laws & fake clinics... why the hell haven't y'all made something to replace abortion, beyond forcing a woman to have the child?
Y'all claim there are people ready to adopt blah blah blah, well how much research have you put in transferring an embryo to a new host as a win win option for both sides?
Because YOU believe it is a child and YOU do not want them to be aborted still does not mean you have a right to tell someone else how to live their life.
Put your money where your mouth is, develop an alternative to abortion that meets your requirements rather than keep screaming that you get to decide the fate of other people who are supposed to have the same fucking rights you have but try to deny them having at every turn.
On the post: Billy Mitchell Lets His Site Lapse, With A Critic Of His High Score Claims Swooping In To Take It Over
Re: Re:
Curse both of you... I was just coming to make a comment about perhaps we shouldn't praise kids over doing things so much... it appears if they peak as a teen they just devolve into suing anyone who says mean things about them while reliving their long past glory days.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the upside winter is coming and when the power goes out the vents stop running...
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re:
"You don't actually give a shit about people's individual rights to bodily integrity in any kind of principled or abstract way."
You mean like when a woman makes a choice to abort?
I love the anti-vaxxers carrying the my body my choice signs & then showing up to demand the right to deny others the choice they make for their body.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re:
Last I checked, she has a Constitutional right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
I do enjoy how you seem to think that women can get knocked up without the assistance of another party, why is there no demand that men always use contraception?
You seem to think it is ONLY the womans responsibility & her inability to use it means she is incapable of voting.
You might be shocked to know that contraception isn't 100%.
You might be shocked to learn that a womans 'right' to get those 16 forms of birth control can be limited if some asshat has a 'religious' reason to deny her access to it.
You might be shocked that only these 'religious' types get to demand how their tax dollars can not be spent, pretty sure Quakers would LOVE the right to deny their tax dollars be spent buying the tools of war but they don't have that right.
You might be shocked to learn that Planned Parenthood is often the only source of contraception & women's health services in many areas but these 'religious' types often stand outside and harass them as baby killers because PP offers among ALL of the services they offer abortion.
You might be shocked to learn to learn that allegedly educated people believe that an ectopic pregnancy can be "relocated" when there is not way do do that.
You might be shocked to learn more money is poured into making sure a woman can't make her own decisions than into making sure that a man actually has to take responsibility for the child he helped create.
When was the last time a religious' group showed up to picket a man for not taking care of his responsibility in bringing a child into the world?
You are not very good at the whole trolling thing, springing to the whole we should kill wives and girlfriends comparing their worth to a bundle of cells.
They are not killing babies. They are killing a parasitic growth that they do not want. Its not a person, its not a baby, its a bundle of cells. You attempt to frame it this way really suggests you shouldn't be taken seriously on any topic.
Millions of children in this nation went to bed hungry last night, and you care more about adding more children to suffer to the world than lifting a finger to help them once they are "born".
Actual children are dying as state agencies fail them, but you're to busy demanding a woman pop out a child for the sin of daring to have had sex outside of wedlock than holding the people who failed children who ended up missing/dead responsible.
In closing... GFY.
I'd worry about children you might bring into the world but your personality makes it clear you won't be reproducing without the use of chemical inducements to make the women miss your sparkling personality.
On the post: North Carolina Sued By Flying Dog Brewery Over Regulatory Body Refusing To Allow Sales Due To 'Offensive' Label
Re:
If only there was a min penalty for violating a constitutional right they could have found representation and slapped these slack jawed idiots down before it got to this point.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
"“I think we need to evaluate what the court is doing on its own terms.”"
And what we've learned is the court will jump through hoops to speed 'religious' based complaints & other rights don't matter as much.
The fact they might have to wear a mask or limit the number of people in the church was so important you gave it the rocket docket.
A woman facing having to carry her rapists baby to term & face busybodies filing lawsuits to screw her over that little bit more wasn't important enough.
Someone looks sideways at a gun, rocket docket to defend the 2nd Amendment.
The court is playing favorites, and while they pretend its just important Constitutional questions, its really odd how many cases they take up are only important to a small loud religious minority of white people getting their way even in the face of causing harm & death to other citizens the court has made clear are not as important.
On the post: Apple Training Videos Highlight Company's Adversarial Stance On Affordable Repairs
I must be a super duper hacker...
I've opened and repaired several iPods all on my own.
I've replaced batteries, reseated connections, replaced hard drives, switched them to running on flash memory to extend battery life.
Perhaps 4th Gen was the best gen... before the glue & needing super secret special tools to try and open them to fix simple things.
On the post: North Carolina Sued By Flying Dog Brewery Over Regulatory Body Refusing To Allow Sales Due To 'Offensive' Label
"had blacklisted about 230 beer and wine brands since 2002 for having labels or names that offended the board's sensibilities."
So they didn't sue for violating their 1st Amendment rights why??
Its not pretty or easy to do, but being able to show a long term pattern of the board using their sensibilities rather than actual legal thingys... I'm thinking many 0's on a check.
Someone might want to inform the board that polygamy is illegal, but violating the Constitution is much worse.
" the fact that it is literally legal to marry your first cousin in North Carolina."
lightbulb I think I know why the board is like this. :)
Waves hi to Marc and T. Greg incase they wander by cause they'd talk to me on twitter.
On the post: Turner Entertainment Forces Name Change Of 'Surrender Dorothy' Beer, Which Isn't Actually Referencing Wizard Of Oz
Re:
Dark Side of the Rainbow FTW!
If you're gonna piss people off get Turner & the RIAA.
On the post: DOJ Now Investigating Florida Sheriff's Office For Using A Federal Grant To Fund Its 'Predictive Policing' Harassment Programs
"This is its formal slang for harassing residents until (in the office's own words) "they sue or move." "
You knew you were doing wrong.
You cheered you were doing wrong.
You violated FERPA.
You decided that people with any connection to a crime, even if they were a victim, were bad people & you needed to run them out of town.
You are the poster child for the racist, intolerant, and ignorant bullies who seek to have power over others to make you feel better about yourself.
You tell other citizens you only go after the "bad people", but the only bad person in this town is you and your officers who punish people over & over.
You never accept they paid for their 'crimes' & keep pushing them to where they will do something wrong again so you can proclaim victory.
Its a pity you won't rot in jail & you won't have to repay the funds you misused from your own pocket.
I do hope the DoJ will look at those you were working with because any humans telling you this was the best course of actions & violating federal law is okay because you're doing it for the greater good should never be allowed in an oversight position over even a shopping cart.
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well it is sort of hard to tell all the white supremacists in Congress apart, they are basically interchangeable.
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Something something if he actually cared about life wouldn't he have done something to stop 675,000 needless deaths?
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Re: Re:
Once again TAC notes he has no home in Missouri but has a home in Virginia.
On the post: As We're Told That No New Social Media App Can Make It, TikTok Surpasses Facebook Downloads & YouTube Watch Time
Re: Re:
It was pretty standard in the 1700 & 1800 hundreds.
Y'all keep forgetting I'm immortal and been watching humanity slipping back towards the cesspool they were born out of.
On the post: As We're Told That No New Social Media App Can Make It, TikTok Surpasses Facebook Downloads & YouTube Watch Time
Re: Re:
stares
Did you miss all the media coverage where hardly any news outlet dared to call a Trump lie a lie?
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Senator from Virginia blows the dog whistle as hard as he can to distract from the Jan 6th insurrection & the recent 'but we don't lock up white people this way' festival.
On the post: Turner Entertainment Forces Name Change Of 'Surrender Dorothy' Beer, Which Isn't Actually Referencing Wizard Of Oz
Someday someone will teach me how to include a url in a comment without landing myself in moderation.
But then I'm stubborn and might not learn.
On the post: Turner Entertainment Forces Name Change Of 'Surrender Dorothy' Beer, Which Isn't Actually Referencing Wizard Of Oz
Re: Re: Wizard of Oz is public domain in the United States
This lead... right here....
(as soon as it gets out of moderation)
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2021/09/company-forced-change-surrender-dorothy-beers-name-d idnt-reference-wizard-oz/
On the post: Turner Entertainment Forces Name Change Of 'Surrender Dorothy' Beer, Which Isn't Actually Referencing Wizard Of Oz
Re: Wizard of Oz is public domain in the United States
IIRC they got a trademark on the word Dorothy.
Thou in my defense its been days since I submitted a lead about this story.
Next >>