You can't answer the question asked. Why would anyone ask more questions? I think it would be better to wait until your mind has developed enough to answer a single question at a time before we hit you with more.
Re: What, so anyone who steals from a particular manufacturer is a "fan" !!
"First, how on earth could you call him a "fan" ?"
He bought merchandise from the company, therefore he is a fan.
"No, he is not a fan he is a criminal. He buys ONE copy and sells at LEAST 2 others, therefore the original sellers only made 1 sale when they should of made 3."
Infringement is not a criminal offense: he is not a criminal until after he is found guilty of criminal (not civil) charges.
I see you're also employing the **AA's proven to be false method of counting lost sales.
"He is not a fan he is a direct competitor, and criminal."
Since you missed it, here it is again: bought product=fan; had civil charges brought against him /= criminal.
Clear yet? (don't answer, I already know)
"Mike, do you believe the person who sells Rolex watches that are fake does so because he is a massive fan of Rolex ? and the quality of their product ?"
I can't answer for Mike, but my answer is no, and no. But this has absolutely nothing to do with this case and you know it. Nice red herring though! ;)
"It's a bizzare world you live in sometimes Mike.."
We all live in it and yes, it is bizarre. No one is arguing that.
Fanatical religious zealots (of any flavor) will do their utmost to realize their goals. They are already "giving 100%" to their "cause". They cannot, by reason, do more than 100%. Releasing the pictures does no harm: it only serves to extinguish doubt about the fact that he is dead.
Until they're released, there will be doubt.
Release the photos, then everyone can "just let it go".
"And after wasting untold billions of dollars and ruining the lives of countless people they will lose this war too. Anyone with cognitive abilities grater than a chimpanzee can tell you that Prohibition WAS A FAILURE, the Drug War IS A FAILURE, and the future war on the free flow of information WILL BE A FAILURE."
(devil's advocate)
By whose definition (from whose viewpoint) are these failures though? I'm sure plenty of people in the enforcement industries created made good money. By their definition, I'm sure these endeavors were successful. (/advocate)
On the post: US Trying To Extradite UK TVShack Admin Over Questionable Copyright Charges?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Jurisdiction
Learn to walk before you run, Forrest.
On the post: US Porn Company Wins Default Judgment Against File Sharer In Canada; Guy Told To Pay $64k
Re: What, so anyone who steals from a particular manufacturer is a "fan" !!
He bought merchandise from the company, therefore he is a fan.
"No, he is not a fan he is a criminal. He buys ONE copy and sells at LEAST 2 others, therefore the original sellers only made 1 sale when they should of made 3."
Infringement is not a criminal offense: he is not a criminal until after he is found guilty of criminal (not civil) charges.
I see you're also employing the **AA's proven to be false method of counting lost sales.
"He is not a fan he is a direct competitor, and criminal."
Since you missed it, here it is again: bought product=fan; had civil charges brought against him /= criminal.
Clear yet? (don't answer, I already know)
"Mike, do you believe the person who sells Rolex watches that are fake does so because he is a massive fan of Rolex ? and the quality of their product ?"
I can't answer for Mike, but my answer is no, and no. But this has absolutely nothing to do with this case and you know it. Nice red herring though! ;)
"It's a bizzare world you live in sometimes Mike.."
We all live in it and yes, it is bizarre. No one is arguing that.
On the post: US Trying To Extradite UK TVShack Admin Over Questionable Copyright Charges?
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: US Trying To Extradite UK TVShack Admin Over Questionable Copyright Charges?
Re:
On the post: When Citizens Elect Comedians Who Run For Office As A Joke...
Re: Re:
http://tashian.com/multibabel/
On the post: Rojadirecta Sues US Government, Homeland Security & ICE Over Domain Seizure
Re: How about evidence and other stuff?
Neither hearsay nor assumptions were involved. The entertainment industry told ICE it was illegal.
What more proof is needed?
/sarc
On the post: Rojadirecta Sues US Government, Homeland Security & ICE Over Domain Seizure
Re: How about evidence and other stuff?
Neither hearsay nor assumptions were involved. The entertainment industry told ICE it was illegal.
What more proof is needed?
/sarc
On the post: China Seizes Websites, Clamps Down On Speech... Uses Copyright Infringement As The Excuse
Re:
On the post: George Clinton Takes On Sample Troll Bridgeport Music Again: The DNA Of Hip Hop Has Been Hijacked
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The List Of Sites Challenging Domain Seizures
Re: Two types of challenges can be filed
On the post: Once Again, The Freedom Of Information Act Is Proving To Be Just That: An Act
Re:
Thank you AC for the valuable insight.
On the post: Once Again, The Freedom Of Information Act Is Proving To Be Just That: An Act
Re: Let sleeping dogs lie
Fanatical religious zealots (of any flavor) will do their utmost to realize their goals. They are already "giving 100%" to their "cause". They cannot, by reason, do more than 100%. Releasing the pictures does no harm: it only serves to extinguish doubt about the fact that he is dead.
Until they're released, there will be doubt.
Release the photos, then everyone can "just let it go".
On the post: Once Again, The Freedom Of Information Act Is Proving To Be Just That: An Act
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
2) The government ignores it.
3) Go back to #1.
Pretty simple actually...
/sarc
On the post: Is Pretending Your Domain Name Has Been Seized By ICE The New Rickroll?
Re: Re:
"There is no such thing as bad publicity except your own obituary. -Brendan Beehan (often mis-attributed to P.T. Barnum)
On the post: Music Service Simfy Files Complaint Over Apple Blocking Its iPad App
Re:
On the post: Publishers Realizing It's Silly To 'Fight Piracy'
Re: Glyn Moody AGAIN !!!!! (the puppet master ?)
On the post: ICE Declares 'Mission Accomplished' On Domain Seizures
Re:
(devil's advocate)
By whose definition (from whose viewpoint) are these failures though? I'm sure plenty of people in the enforcement industries created made good money. By their definition, I'm sure these endeavors were successful. (/advocate)
Totally agree with your stance, btw. ;)
On the post: Why Propping Up Old Business Models Is Bad For The Economy And Bad For Innovation
Re: Re: Coypright Creationists
On the post: Why Propping Up Old Business Models Is Bad For The Economy And Bad For Innovation
Re: Re: Re: Re: who is propping up old business models, who needs too ?
On the post: Why Propping Up Old Business Models Is Bad For The Economy And Bad For Innovation
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>