It's been said that knowledge is power. If knowledge and information is not free or is taxed, censured, unduly private or the ownership and control is maintained and extended beyond a reasonable amount of time then the longer moneyed interests can control the dissemination of knowledge and information and the longer we can be a somewhat controllable population?
Then the next thing you know it will be discovered that your local nationwide bank is in a concerted effort with government to track and monitor and plan coordinated contingencies against the people. Oh wait..
Why are there a handful of, theoretically elected, political people facilitating this,, as was mentioned up in post#2, plague? Because it is a rather nasty situation and it's not looking good. Don't you think these folks would be uncomfortable with their head up their butts and for so long? I guess the RIAA/MPAA told certain folks it feels good to have your head up there. Something.
How the fuck is this even tolerated? Look at that list! Any dick with a badge can access that data!?
Fuck Jerry Brown! and any other privacy crippling ass clown that thinks access to your personal effects - your phone - is their privilege and "right". Fuck you! Now and forevermore.
"Can I see your phone please?" What? You mean touch it? No. "Give me your phone." Fuck you.
Nice. As if every one of our chosen representatives isn't thrown into the pit of a government too big to swallow. You want to see a worse nation? Then keep voting for crap and supporting people that make the shit pile bigger - a whole lot of stench in an itty-bitty space.
If you're too big to be properly accountable then, it doth seem, you are too big to fail. Last stop: sheep masquerading as citizens? Or wolves masquerading as sheep?
What? Loon. Whatever it is you're trying to build (or destroy) here I, for one, think you might need to stfu sometimes. We get it, you don't appreciate this guy's opinion. So? Maybe you could, you know, take a chance and form a coherent counter to the opinions presented?
You can still, you know, be a loon, but, damn, how about changing it up a bit?
The irony is that I've been wondering why folks continue to feed you and yet .. fuck.
Ownership and control that transcends the intent of copyright must be purged. The imposition on culture by a culture based upon permission deserves neither respect nor obligation. Burn.
16 critical infrastructure sectors; that seems pretty specific. I haven't read this yet but off the top of my head I'm wondering why that isn't less than 1.
Information exchange. Well, that seems to me like people communicating. Be it a seller and a customer or a company sharing catalogs of analytics or countless similar things - people are involved. Right or wrong, just or not, the fact is that information about people is involved.
Do they get privacy in their communications or not? Whole privacy.
Cybersecurity is a defensive art. You need to know how to protect yourself in ever changing conditions. You need to understand what it is you're protecting yourself against. And here we have, what I understand it to be, people. Even. The. Ones. That. You. Are. Defending. There is a new separation that has not been recognized. You leaders, true and not, must engage. As far as the US goes it is imperative that they pay attention that they're setting the bar based upon the core values and beliefs that are those of a free people.
Communications == People == Privacy : Cardinal position one
Well, being that we can't get answers from telecom providers and we can't get answers from the government agencies involved and being that the majority of communications go through those same telecom providers it is only logical that the NSA's actual answer to the question of 'how many' is being answered accurately. They do not know because all communication is being sifted at the points of the telecom so our representatives are, without a doubt, being disingenuous, clueless and in the worst case could actually be considered to be operating in direct contradiction to their stated oaths.
But we can't prove or disprove that can we? Perception is reality.
Not only can they listen but you can no longer protest within a location of two degrees longitude and latitude of any location of any given secret service agent.
As I've recently mentioned: There is nothing that we can do. There is very little ground left to loose. Bear arms and protect your children.
Awe, that's too bad your old business model needs government support. Some would call that an entitlement. Business welfare even.
To hell with your business. People will spend their money on other things and they will be entertained.
Copyright - 25 years. If it hasn't helped progress the sciences or paid some rent by then well too bad. I'm officially drawing my moral line in the sand. Picture, story, sound or film - 26 years and I'm taking it. TAKING IT. End of story. There are two sides to every coin and it can't stay spinning forever.
MPAA et al, fuck off. Maximalists, loss. Game over. I win.
These guys just want a job. They can't risk being labeled as weak on terrorism.
If you were to ask me well I would say that the way to be strong on terrorism is to be a strong upholder of the Constitution. It's quite simple really. If you harm the people of the US we will kill you, dead. That's a strong stance against terror in my opinion. Hell, it could even go both ways if you wanted to peel the onion.
Our elected officials, including the CIC, though they are elected they are clearly owned by those heady folks at Justice and Intel.
Something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. To make matters worse there is no way out.
They can't tell you because it's bad. They're protecting themselves in the name of protecting America - by grabbing balls and telephone calls. Secrets destroy.
The Curtain is Iron.
Homeland Security? Are you fucking kidding me with that? Their mission is to secure the homeland right? I'm betting that means protection from within first and foremost.
I'm also betting that we haven't seen anything yet (pun semi-intended).
So strap in, strap on, grab a seat under the Curtain or grab a dick - your choice.
You will send us another note from the land of the lost some time won't you?
I think I'd rather risk being blown up at this point than to live in the place you think is safe enough to drive down the road and purchase your ice cream cone.
Freedom reigns as long as it's allowed to or as long as we demand it? You need to be checked to ensure you're enjoying your freedom in an authorized manner? I think you've lived a sheltered life. That or you've inadvertently been born to the wrong country. Or you simply like being on your knees.
We are not fucking sheep all of us. Your argument sickens me.
On the post: German Newspaper 'Snippet' Law Passes: Watered Down, But Still Stupid
Then the next thing you know it will be discovered that your local nationwide bank is in a concerted effort with government to track and monitor and plan coordinated contingencies against the people. Oh wait..
Why are there a handful of, theoretically elected, political people facilitating this,, as was mentioned up in post#2, plague? Because it is a rather nasty situation and it's not looking good. Don't you think these folks would be uncomfortable with their head up their butts and for so long? I guess the RIAA/MPAA told certain folks it feels good to have your head up there. Something.
single words or snippets? "Your Mama."
On the post: System Used By New Six Strikes CAS, Falsely Identifies Game Mods As NBC TV Shows
On the post: The Details Of What Information The Police Can Suck Out Of Your Phone
WTF!?
Fuck Jerry Brown! and any other privacy crippling ass clown that thinks access to your personal effects - your phone - is their privilege and "right". Fuck you! Now and forevermore.
"Can I see your phone please?" What? You mean touch it? No. "Give me your phone." Fuck you.
Fuck.
On the post: Top German Police Officer: 'Anyone On The Internet Has Left The Private Sphere'
All I thought was "Fucking tool.".
On the post: North Carolina Newspaper With No Backbone Apologizes For Its Request For Public Records
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cowardice?
I personally think that this particular public record should have, at a minimum, the same level of protection as DMV records.
On the post: Anatomy Of A Boondoggle: How The US Broadband Plan Led To WV Buying $20,000 Routers For A One Room Library
Re:
If you're too big to be properly accountable then, it doth seem, you are too big to fail. Last stop: sheep masquerading as citizens? Or wolves masquerading as sheep?
On the post: Anatomy Of A Boondoggle: How The US Broadband Plan Led To WV Buying $20,000 Routers For A One Room Library
Re: "this is not at all surprising."
You can still, you know, be a loon, but, damn, how about changing it up a bit?
The irony is that I've been wondering why folks continue to feed you and yet .. fuck.
On the post: Why Does The Entertainment Industry Insist That It Can Veto Any Innovation It Doesn't Like?
Seriously
On the post: To Argue That 'Copyright And The First Amendment Coexisted For 200 Years' Is To Ignore Reality
Re: Mike "Streisand Effect Masnick, you just publicized Chris Ruen!
How's that "piracy" thing working out for ya?
On the post: To Argue That 'Copyright And The First Amendment Coexisted For 200 Years' Is To Ignore Reality
Re:
The freedom to speak is ours to win or loose.
Ownership and control that transcends the intent of copyright must be purged. The imposition on culture by a culture based upon permission deserves neither respect nor obligation. Burn.
On the post: Viral Video Of 9-Year-Old Girl Football Star... Taken Down Because Of Music
Re: Re: Re: Re: One small correction
On the post: LEAKED! Here's The White House's Draft Cybersecurity Executive Order
Information exchange. Well, that seems to me like people communicating. Be it a seller and a customer or a company sharing catalogs of analytics or countless similar things - people are involved. Right or wrong, just or not, the fact is that information about people is involved.
Do they get privacy in their communications or not? Whole privacy.
Cybersecurity is a defensive art. You need to know how to protect yourself in ever changing conditions. You need to understand what it is you're protecting yourself against. And here we have, what I understand it to be, people. Even. The. Ones. That. You. Are. Defending. There is a new separation that has not been recognized. You leaders, true and not, must engage. As far as the US goes it is imperative that they pay attention that they're setting the bar based upon the core values and beliefs that are those of a free people.
Communications == People == Privacy : Cardinal position one
On the post: House Approves Bill To Spy On Americans By Misrepresenting Or Lying About What's In The Bill
How many Americans?
But we can't prove or disprove that can we? Perception is reality.
On the post: House Approves Rep. Lamar Smith's Bill To Keep Spying On Americans
Nothing
As I've recently mentioned: There is nothing that we can do. There is very little ground left to loose. Bear arms and protect your children.
On the post: MPAA Sends Five Key Propaganda Points To Politicians
Too Bad
To hell with your business. People will spend their money on other things and they will be entertained.
Copyright - 25 years. If it hasn't helped progress the sciences or paid some rent by then well too bad. I'm officially drawing my moral line in the sand. Picture, story, sound or film - 26 years and I'm taking it. TAKING IT. End of story. There are two sides to every coin and it can't stay spinning forever.
MPAA et al, fuck off. Maximalists, loss. Game over. I win.
On the post: House To Vote On FISA Amendments Act, Despite Not Even Knowing How It's Being Interpreted
Re: Re: Strong on Terrorism
...
Ah.. right, nothing. Of course.
On the post: House To Vote On FISA Amendments Act, Despite Not Even Knowing How It's Being Interpreted
Strong on Terrorism
If you were to ask me well I would say that the way to be strong on terrorism is to be a strong upholder of the Constitution. It's quite simple really. If you harm the people of the US we will kill you, dead. That's a strong stance against terror in my opinion. Hell, it could even go both ways if you wanted to peel the onion.
Our elected officials, including the CIC, though they are elected they are clearly owned by those heady folks at Justice and Intel.
Something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. To make matters worse there is no way out.
They can't tell you because it's bad. They're protecting themselves in the name of protecting America - by grabbing balls and telephone calls. Secrets destroy.
The Curtain is Iron.
Homeland Security? Are you fucking kidding me with that? Their mission is to secure the homeland right? I'm betting that means protection from within first and foremost.
I'm also betting that we haven't seen anything yet (pun semi-intended).
So strap in, strap on, grab a seat under the Curtain or grab a dick - your choice.
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: If you really are upset by this you need to relax
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: Re:
I think I'd rather risk being blown up at this point than to live in the place you think is safe enough to drive down the road and purchase your ice cream cone.
Freedom reigns as long as it's allowed to or as long as we demand it? You need to be checked to ensure you're enjoying your freedom in an authorized manner? I think you've lived a sheltered life. That or you've inadvertently been born to the wrong country. Or you simply like being on your knees.
We are not fucking sheep all of us. Your argument sickens me.
Next >>