If anyone is interested (highly relevant for this place.. -I'm looking at you OOTB) Coursera has the FREE 12 week course on US Constitutional Law via Yale university (Professor Akhil Reed Amar ) starting on 27th January 2014.
Aiding can ONLy occur after infringement has been PROVEN
I know these words are hard for you to understand and have more than one syllable but I see you have learnt what moderation is.. maybe you should moderate yourself from making out you're an even bigger fool than previously thought
also for a nice laughable read now.. read there privacy policy http://ptv.vic.gov.au/privacy/#myki [my favourite part is where they state "PTV and its agents will take all reasonable measures to secure personal information." )
In fact further to this if any Victorians are reading this I would advise you if you are a Metlink customer (and that's basically anyone who has ridden on a Bus, Train or Tram) to contact your Local MP (Federal and State) as well specifically the Victorian Privacy CommissionerM/a>
Believe me this Teenager is definitely not going to be convicted on anything under the Crimes Act.
Though Metlink might have bit off more than they can chew under the Federal Privacy Act now.. More so since they are government contractors (for Govt Public Transport sector in Victoria)and can be criminally charged (Directors of companies are liable) because they had full foreknowledge and refused to act.
In March this all changes to even more detrimental affect towards Companies who knowingly do NOT secure there information that comes under the new Australian Privacy Principles.
Would suck to be a Director of Metlink at moment ;) Also on an interesting note Victoria is the state where the first ever Australian so called 'hacking' cases were done on the pushing by the US Secret Service and FBI way back in late 80's and early 90's with NO major punishments or any other major detriment to the teenage defendants.
Re: Oooh, you've got some "Numbers"! Most would brag of substance,
>>> And since doesn't count mine which I estimate at near 2000 just this year, it's way off. But the listing pleases the shrinking pool of ardent fanboys.
The colour Green doesn't suit you OOTB...
Maybe.. just maybe if you want your name immortalized in print by the person you secretly have a crush on (sorry Mike but it has to be said.. and WE ARE SORRY!) - it would e a good idea to actually REGISTER your name as a commentator since people with registered accounts are the ONLY ones who can be counted properly. What a concept hey?
Again, I'm not sure under what jurisdiction or exactly what kind of lawsuit Orange is intending to bring,
Most likely Admiralty Law. This would be very apt since Eleanor of Aquitaine, The Queen of France actually introduced it to England at the time of Richard the Lionheart (12th Century).
Under this they could go a few routes one of the most interesting being the actual act of Piracy. Now that would make my freakin year!
Actually Turing was a part of the team at Bletchley Park and NOT the main person (No one really was - like most war efforts it was TEAMWORK), in fact if you really want to know who allowed the decryption of the Enigma's etc you need to look at the original Polish mathematicians which came over to England in first place that allowed Bletchley Park to even exist.
Exactly.. great that Turing was pardoned (and he was not the main person at Bletchley Park anyway but instead a part of a HUGE team of brilliant people)
Though what about every single other person who was charged and then convicted of the same offense in all parts of the Commonwealth at the time this charge was on the books? When will they be pardoned by the parliament let alone by the Queen?
Ah there's your problem, you're confusing an actual democratic country like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, most of the EU, Emerites, etc where Employment laws actually protect employees with the United States of America where money and corporate greed rule and the peasants can eat cake if they can even afford that.
So, how did the RIAA obtain this evidence to pass over to the Feds?
Echelon, Five Eyes (FVEY), the UKUSA Agreement... take your pick.
OH and Don't forget Skype has NEVER really been secure from the beginning. Though this was originally a Criminal investigation and any Skype interception would of been necessary and not unknown (or hard), the passing on of evidence to third parties (espec. if they are alleged victims) is not only frowned upon but can be classified as spoilation of any jury pool and is in some instances (this gets to that bright line) actually an offense under most regimes (NZ/AU). The prosecution has to appear unbiased and not hold any one victim above the actual offices of the court. In this situation your (the US's) DoJ has gone beyond the pale and shown they are actually prosecuting for nefarious and vindictive purposes on the behest of a third biased party and not due to actual protection of law.
Yes, they knew about it, 100%, and profited from it.
The telephone company knows absolutely that there is communication of criminal (not just unlawful) behaviour on its networks.. Using your logic they too should remove the phone lines & cell towers because they 100% know it's happening!
See what happens when you don't understand what the law calls "REASONABLENESS"... It comes from the word REASON something that it seems your lacking
1 person might not have the wherewithal either financially or legally (even though they would have an absolute defense the bullshit in the US courts would be daunting).
Though crowd funding this could be a way to actually purchase a license (which isn't a license at all but would be more likely a contract) then totally forfeit that contract by releasing the whole content into the public arena NO FEE (torrent is just one avenue).
The courts could NOT close it down, DMCA's would not work since the content is NOT copyrightable (ie: NO ONE has a claim on it legally), and the only legal avenue that T3Media might be able to take is via contract forfeiture which would be highly problematic, and cause them more problems (if they won anyway.. and having the crowd source done through another country would instantly render most court routes moot too)
This most likely is NOT going to work out well for T3Media nor the DoD.
On the post: South Carolina Senator Aims To Criminalize The Recording Of Criminal Activity
Re: Re:
On the post: DailyDirt: The Coming Education Revolution
If anyone is interested (highly relevant for this place.. -I'm looking at you OOTB) Coursera has the FREE 12 week course on US Constitutional Law via Yale university (Professor Akhil Reed Amar ) starting on 27th January 2014.
https://www.coursera.org/course/conlaw
I've enrolled and am looking forward to it, especially since I'm not a US citizen and your US Constitution has always intrigued me.
On the post: City Of London Police Cannot Seize Domains Just Because Hollywood Says The Websites Are Infringers
Re:
I know these words are hard for you to understand and have more than one syllable but I see you have learnt what moderation is.. maybe you should moderate yourself from making out you're an even bigger fool than previously thought
On the post: Australian Teen Alerts Transit Department To Security Hole On Website... Gets Reported To Police
Re:
http://ptv.vic.gov.au/tickets/myki
It's part of Public Transport Victoria
also for a nice laughable read now.. read there privacy policy http://ptv.vic.gov.au/privacy/#myki [my favourite part is where they state "PTV and its agents will take all reasonable measures to secure personal information." )
oh and the Contact details at bottom are TO USE!
On the post: Australian Teen Alerts Transit Department To Security Hole On Website... Gets Reported To Police
Re:
I would also recommend any organisation within Australia (this covers ALL now not just government) or wanting to do business with Australia to read, analyse, and implement the new Australian Privacy Principles (APP's)that come into effect on March 2014.
Also you might note that Notification of Data breaches are now mandatory (not just voluntary under the old guide)
On the post: Australian Teen Alerts Transit Department To Security Hole On Website... Gets Reported To Police
Though Metlink might have bit off more than they can chew under the Federal Privacy Act now.. More so since they are government contractors (for Govt Public Transport sector in Victoria)and can be criminally charged (Directors of companies are liable) because they had full foreknowledge and refused to act.
In March this all changes to even more detrimental affect towards Companies who knowingly do NOT secure there information that comes under the new Australian Privacy Principles.
Would suck to be a Director of Metlink at moment ;)
Also on an interesting note Victoria is the state where the first ever Australian so called 'hacking' cases were done on the pushing by the US Secret Service and FBI way back in late 80's and early 90's with NO major punishments or any other major detriment to the teenage defendants.
On the post: Australian Teen Alerts Transit Department To Security Hole On Website... Gets Reported To Police
Re: "likely he used a SQL injection vulnerability" -- That IS hacking.
Wear it with pride
On the post: Not Cool: MPAA Joins The W3C
Re: Re: blackmailed into going along with this
Now papermache with barbed wire inserts to act as a faraday cage on the other hand...
;)
On the post: Techdirt 2013: The Numbers.
Re:
though its seems the Raptors are eating them all now :)
On the post: Techdirt 2013: The Numbers.
Re: Oooh, you've got some "Numbers"! Most would brag of substance,
The colour Green doesn't suit you OOTB...
Maybe.. just maybe if you want your name immortalized in print by the person you secretly have a crush on (sorry Mike but it has to be said.. and WE ARE SORRY!) - it would e a good idea to actually REGISTER your name as a commentator since people with registered accounts are the ONLY ones who can be counted properly. What a concept hey?
On the post: French Telco Orange Plans To Sue The NSA For Tapping Its Undersea Cables
Most likely Admiralty Law. This would be very apt since Eleanor of Aquitaine, The Queen of France actually introduced it to England at the time of Richard the Lionheart (12th Century).
Under this they could go a few routes one of the most interesting being the actual act of Piracy. Now that would make my freakin year!
On the post: It Is 2013, And The Queen Just Pardoned Alan Turing
Re: Unsung Heroes
On the post: It Is 2013, And The Queen Just Pardoned Alan Turing
Re:
Though what about every single other person who was charged and then convicted of the same offense in all parts of the Commonwealth at the time this charge was on the books? When will they be pardoned by the parliament let alone by the Queen?
On the post: Chicago Sandwich Shop Emails Employees On Dec. 23rd To Say Merry Christmas And You're All Fired
Re:
On the post: DOJ Releases Some Megaupload Evidence; Actually Shows Difficulty Of Running Cloud Service
Re: american idiots
On the post: DOJ Releases Some Megaupload Evidence; Actually Shows Difficulty Of Running Cloud Service
Re: Re: Re:
Echelon, Five Eyes (FVEY), the UKUSA Agreement... take your pick.
OH and Don't forget Skype has NEVER really been secure from the beginning. Though this was originally a Criminal investigation and any Skype interception would of been necessary and not unknown (or hard), the passing on of evidence to third parties (espec. if they are alleged victims) is not only frowned upon but can be classified as spoilation of any jury pool and is in some instances (this gets to that bright line) actually an offense under most regimes (NZ/AU). The prosecution has to appear unbiased and not hold any one victim above the actual offices of the court. In this situation your (the US's) DoJ has gone beyond the pale and shown they are actually prosecuting for nefarious and vindictive purposes on the behest of a third biased party and not due to actual protection of law.
On the post: DOJ Releases Some Megaupload Evidence; Actually Shows Difficulty Of Running Cloud Service
Re:
The telephone company knows absolutely that there is communication of criminal (not just unlawful) behaviour on its networks.. Using your logic they too should remove the phone lines & cell towers because they 100% know it's happening!
See what happens when you don't understand what the law calls "REASONABLENESS"... It comes from the word REASON something that it seems your lacking
On the post: Defense Department Privatizes Giant Public Domain Media Archive
Re: Eh, not the best solution but....
Though crowd funding this could be a way to actually purchase a license (which isn't a license at all but would be more likely a contract) then totally forfeit that contract by releasing the whole content into the public arena NO FEE (torrent is just one avenue).
The courts could NOT close it down, DMCA's would not work since the content is NOT copyrightable (ie: NO ONE has a claim on it legally), and the only legal avenue that T3Media might be able to take is via contract forfeiture which would be highly problematic, and cause them more problems (if they won anyway.. and having the crowd source done through another country would instantly render most court routes moot too)
This most likely is NOT going to work out well for T3Media nor the DoD.
On the post: Viral Satire Over Student Suspended For Saying 'Merry Christmas' Leads To Real Problems For Elementary School
Re: dIS-INFORMATION AND CONFUSION
OMG itS inFECted mine.
It mUSt be a Clique Of Normals Secretly Performing Insidious Rituals Aimed at Controlling You!
On the post: Viral Satire Over Student Suspended For Saying 'Merry Christmas' Leads To Real Problems For Elementary School
Re: Re: Satirical works are supposed to be unbelievablely extreme
Then again that Dihydrogen Monoxide is a killer I've read ;)
Next >>