How do you figure, sports fan? Inferring that Google will go offline? Even were that true, and I don't believe it's as possible as you think, Bing would be my last choice.
The problem that I have with the complaint is where they specifically say the defendant is a Panamanian Company, not a US company. That puts the company out of US jurisdiction. Granted, Titov could, possibly, be cornered. If he doesn't sell off his US property and go back to Panama, or anywhere else outside of the US.
So there you have it. How does the US have jurisdiction? How do they plan on enforcing any judgment rendered on a foreign national?
What do you think about the complaint is strong and damning? What evidence are they putting forward to support this? Or are you just here to tell us 'Ugh! Masnick wrong!' ? We get enough of that, really.
Did he talk about the case? The specifics thereof, not the entertainment value of it. Can you prove it? You can't force him to incriminate himself, either, you see. There's an amendment for that.
I think you're a bit off base, here. My Facebook is NOT public information. If you are not listed among my friends, you don't get to see anything more than my picture. Which isn't of me, anyways.
In the end, the stretch seems to be your's, particularly if they couldn't just go to his FB page and read it.
Your speculation isn't better than the other's speculation. It's still what YOU believe the numbers represent. Without more information NEITHER of you could be said to be absolutely correct.
In the end, the endless copyrights of today do not really seem to be helping anyone except corporations that don't NEED the help.
I don't understand how 'top of the line' and 'proprietary' are contradictory. They could be a leader in hardware, but be completely proprietary. Apple comes to mind, at least a few years ago. These days I'm even less inclined to purchase either.
Just at a guess here... They are talking about overages. You can't always know you're going to go over, and even if you do 'buy' those blocks, you are limited to 3. Step back and look at the conversation, again.
If you read your own link you will note that the ones passing the information are the ones in violation of that particular law. Not the news publications receiving it. It is arguable whether or not Wikileaks is a news publication, itself, but it certainly is not an individual passing the information on in secret to foreign agents. In fact, what they publish has been redacted.
In your example, you have the power, but the right has been legislated out. Therefore no right exists. We are discussing a power that has not been deemed illegal, and therefore the inherent right exists.
Is it illegal, then? If it isn't illegal, how do they NOT have the right? I am seriously not understanding this position. If it has not been legislated out, then it is an inherent right, and no amount of saying there is no right will restrict the use of this power.
On the post: Is It Copyright Infringement To Pass A DMCA Notice On To ChillingEffects?
Re: Chilling Report Contact Information
On the post: Is It Copyright Infringement To Pass A DMCA Notice On To ChillingEffects?
Re: ssl site only
On the post: Is It Copyright Infringement To Pass A DMCA Notice On To ChillingEffects?
Re: Re:
On the post: Is It Copyright Infringement To Pass A DMCA Notice On To ChillingEffects?
Re: Re: Legal Notice
Example:
Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 108. Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives.
On the post: MPAA Files Surprisingly Weak Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Hotfile
Re: Re: Re:
So there you have it. How does the US have jurisdiction? How do they plan on enforcing any judgment rendered on a foreign national?
On the post: MPAA Files Surprisingly Weak Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Hotfile
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But we'll still count it in bogus piracy stats
On the post: MPAA Files Surprisingly Weak Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Hotfile
Re: Re:
On the post: Can A Judge Force A Juror To Reveal Facebook Account Info?
Re:
On the post: Can A Judge Force A Juror To Reveal Facebook Account Info?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Can A Judge Force A Juror To Reveal Facebook Account Info?
Re:
In the end, the stretch seems to be your's, particularly if they couldn't just go to his FB page and read it.
On the post: If Artists Don't Value Copyright On Their Works, Why Do We Force It On Them?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: If Artists Don't Value Copyright On Their Works, Why Do We Force It On Them?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Your math does not add up to 2/3rds majority to pass that law.
On the post: If Artists Don't Value Copyright On Their Works, Why Do We Force It On Them?
Re: Re: Nice Self Nuke There
In the end, the endless copyrights of today do not really seem to be helping anyone except corporations that don't NEED the help.
On the post: Sony Demanding Identity Of Anyone Who Saw PS3 Jailbreak Video On YouTube
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Canadian Broadband Regulators Annoyed That People Are Pointing Out They Don't Understand What They're Regulating
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Judge Bans Handing (Factual) Pamphlets To Jurors; Raising First Amendment Issues
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: First Amendment scrutiny
On the post: If The US Wants To Have Any Credibility On Internet Freedom It Should Drop The Attempt To Prosecute Assange
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: If The US Wants To Have Any Credibility On Internet Freedom It Should Drop The Attempt To Prosecute Assange
Re:
http://bit.ly/gwkWw9
http://bit.ly/ebLrAr
On the post: Judge Bans Handing (Factual) Pamphlets To Jurors; Raising First Amendment Issues
Re: Re: Re: Re: First Amendment scrutiny
On the post: Judge Bans Handing (Factual) Pamphlets To Jurors; Raising First Amendment Issues
Re: Re: Re: Re: First Amendment scrutiny
Next >>