Judge Slams Universal Music For Trying To 'Bamboozle' Court & Producers Over Eminem Royalties
from the but-that's-how-the-labels-work... dept
We've had plenty of discussions about shady RIAA accounting, and more and more of that is coming out in public following a series of lawsuits that concern both how the major labels account for digital sales (is it a sale or a license?), but also in how they calculate overall royalties. One of the most high profile of these cases involves Eminem's producers, FBT Productions, which was the first of these cases to rule that digital/iTunes sales were "licenses" and not sales (and thus required Universal Music to pay much higher royalty rates: 50% as opposed to ~15%). Of course, as the case has moved on to other stages, it's increasingly revealing some of the many, many shady practices that Universal Music has been using to try to hide revenue from Eminem -- including trying to expense the cost of this very lawsuit against his earnings.The latest news is that a judge has completely slammed Universal's latest attempt to hide money from FBT, after it came out that Universal had inserted what appeared to be a minor definitional piece into a summary judgment action earlier in the case, which it's now using to claim that FBT should only get a cut of 29% of revenue, rather than 100% or revenue. The details are a bit technical, but as THResq explains:
Last autumn, Universal brought a motion for summary judgment on the phrase "our net receipts" in the agreement in question. In response, the judge ruled that "our" referred to Aftermath. So Universal says the judge's ruling means FBT has to live with what Aftermath gets (29 percent) instead of what Universal gets (100 percent).However, Universal also has some sort of tricky accounting going on for foreign receipts, in which Aftermath only gets 29% -- so now it's arguing that it only has to pay out the 50% on that 29%, rather than on the full 100%. The judge reasonably went ballistic at this obvious attempt to trick the court and FBT, and to effectively sneak through the provision defining "our net receipts" earlier:
"Furthermore, the Court is deeply troubled by Defendants’ argument. While it is hard to see what FBT could gain by feigning ignorance, it is now quite apparent what Defendants could hope to gain by bamboozling the Court and Plaintiffs on this issue. Defendants’ current stance makes it appear as though Defendants carefully inserted the issue into the motion for summary judgment before they had notified FBT or the Court of what percentage of the revenues from foreign sales of permanent downloads and mastertones would be paid to FBT. An attempt to dupe the Court into a premature ruling will not serve as the basis to deny FBT an opportunity to challenge Defendants’ accounting practices."This does not bode well for Universal in this case, however it is yet another example of the tricky math that the RIAA labels like to use in screwing over artists. It's good to see more and more of this coming out in public, though it's really quite amazing the lengths that these labels (mainly the majors) will go to in order to keep money from artists, using all sorts of suspicious accounting and legal tricks. The deceptiveness here is clearly planned out, and they seem almost proud of how clever they are in screwing over artists. It's stunning. In an era where more and more artists are realizing that having a label is now an option not a requirement, publicly trying to screw them over on royalties is not exactly a path to success.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bamboozle, court, eminem, royalties
Companies: fbt productions, universal music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Music Industry is Financed By Slavery
If this weren't true (it has been an open secret for decades), it would be hilarious.
Overt slavery is only dead if the determination of whom to enslave is based solely on race. Otherwise, it is alive and thriving in the old-school music industry (and many others).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Help is on the way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Help is on the way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
moron - Ethics = Music Industry
There.... fixed it for ya !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wouldn't that be "slim shady" in this case? :0)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kinda like income tax that way so it's gotta be legal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
No, unfortunately that's not true. Those who do pay taxes foot the bill for everyone who underpays or don't pay at all. If your tax-evading parent's kid does not show up at his public school, they will haul him in because that hurts their bottom line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There are always free-loaders in any system - the trick is to minimise them. Sometimes, they are 'allowed' free-loaders. Sometimes, the free-loaders are taking advantage of others. No system is perfect, so all you can do is decide which forms you don't mind, and which forms you want to campaign against.
It would be a wonderful world (libertarian utopia?) if you only had to pay taxes for those services that you particularly want, or if everyone had a decent standard of living as an absolute minimum with no taxes. Sadly, we don't live in Star Trek's Federation, and we have to deal with the real world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If I were a musician I would sell my work independently, let's face it the Internet makes that piss easy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've said it a million times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I've said it a million times
The RIAA/MPAA are just the lobbyists paid to support the positions of the cartel members.
I wonder if one could use kickstarter to fund bringing a former head of the RIAA/MPAA out of "retirement" to argue how horrible the business practices are.
If you pay them, they will say anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their days are numbered and they have no place on this planet anymore.
If I was the president I would round them all up and send their ass to Gitmo. They're the real terrorist lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]