I'm glad people want to come here. It means we're a better place than wherever they're coming from. It's when people start to leave that I'll get worried.
If the law is detrimental to society, the economy, and humanity, then I'd say change the law. Keeping illegals here and making them legal will be better for the U.S. in the long run.
Re: Re: 1) "during its February sweeps" -- is a limited data set
Techdirt only reports on ICE because it's a long-evolved extension of its technology reporting. Why should it report on apartheid in Israel? Is it a high-tech wall?
I agree, esp. when guys like David Boies also do things like overturning California's Proposition 8 and helping Lawrence Lessig challenge the Electoral College.
This is one case where it seems lots of people just assume he's guilty as sin and don't really care what happens to him as long as he's thoroughly punished.
But that's different than a streaming service, where you can pick and choose which episodes or content you want to watch. I'd rather pay for access to a massive library than have one programmed for me on cable.
While it's not as simple as that and such a law would never be passed, it would solve a lot of problems with copyright.
I would put a time limit on it though, to say if a work wasn't made available for a certain number of years. There are valid reasons not to make something available temporarily, but it should not be out of print indefinitely. And an exception would be works with pending legal issues.
Of course, it raises a can of worms about what constitutes "making available" and "reasonable price."
If you truly have respect for the legal system and laws, then you can respect that she has served her time in prison and is therefore vindicated of any crimes.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: just about any job fuels something else that allows someone else to make money.
I'm in Kansas City, and even today we still have a couple of video rental stores operating. Blockbuster never killed them all off, nor did Netflix. Maybe my city is an anomaly?
Re: Re: Re: just about any job fuels something else that allows someone else to make money.
Blockbuster was rarely the only game in town. There were always many competing video rental stores. Blockbuster was just the national chain - the only one capable of competing with Netflix for streaming, but it was too protective of its rental business to change direction.
Funny how the music industry won't release an mp3 of a song for free, but are happy to offer a music video with the mp3 embedded for free.
Funny how the music video itself has no value, but the audio inside it is precious.
What is it that makes the video worth giving away but not the music?
Frankly, I've ripped songs from youtube vids before, but usually just for music I can't buy otherwise. If they won't offer it for sale, why not give it away for free?
And here I thought the purpose of serving prison time was to act as punishment for their crimes, but I guess some people can't accept that and want criminals to be punished for the rest of their lives. Funny how those are the same people that put all their faith in the justice system.
On the post: Disney: The Only Fun Allowed At Children's Birthday Parties Is Properly Licensed Fun
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Disney: The Only Fun Allowed At Children's Birthday Parties Is Properly Licensed Fun
Re:
On the post: Emails Show ICE Couldn't Find Enough Dangerous Immigrants To Fulfill The Adminstration's Fantasies
Re: Re: Re: Re: Confirm our fantasy!
On the post: Emails Show ICE Couldn't Find Enough Dangerous Immigrants To Fulfill The Adminstration's Fantasies
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Emails Show ICE Couldn't Find Enough Dangerous Immigrants To Fulfill The Adminstration's Fantasies
Re:
On the post: Emails Show ICE Couldn't Find Enough Dangerous Immigrants To Fulfill The Adminstration's Fantasies
Re: Amazed
On the post: Emails Show ICE Couldn't Find Enough Dangerous Immigrants To Fulfill The Adminstration's Fantasies
Re: Re: 1) "during its February sweeps" -- is a limited data set
On the post: Harvey Weinstein Tries Every Possible Response To Explosive NY Times Story
Re: Lawyering
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drpgiUP6Yrc
He takes on high profile cases. He just may not be on your side. That's what lawyers do.
On the post: Members Of Congress: Court Was Wrong To Say That Posting The Law Is Copyright Infringement
Re:
On the post: Trump's FCC Boss Blasts Apple For Refusing To 'Turn On' FM iPhone Chipsets That Don't Actually Exist
Re: Re:
On the post: Supreme Court Won't Review US Government Getting To Steal All Of Kim Dotcom's Stuff
Re:
On the post: Supreme Court Won't Review US Government Getting To Steal All Of Kim Dotcom's Stuff
Re: 'They had it coming.'
On the post: As 'Star Trek: Discovery' Shows, The Streaming Exclusivity Wars Risk Driving Users Back To Piracy
Re: We already get the milk
On the post: Sirius XM Uses DMCA To Memory Hole Archive Of Howard Stern's Interviews With Donald Trump
Re:
I would put a time limit on it though, to say if a work wasn't made available for a certain number of years. There are valid reasons not to make something available temporarily, but it should not be out of print indefinitely. And an exception would be works with pending legal issues.
Of course, it raises a can of worms about what constitutes "making available" and "reasonable price."
On the post: As 'Star Trek: Discovery' Shows, The Streaming Exclusivity Wars Risk Driving Users Back To Piracy
Re:
The way to make these services appealing is to offer deep libraries. That why Netflix made money with the DVD service.
On the post: Moral Muppets At Harvard Cave In To The CIA; Rescind Chelsea Manning's Fellowship
Re: Re: Really?
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: just about any job fuels something else that allows someone else to make money.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: just about any job fuels something else that allows someone else to make money.
On the post: Music Industry Is Painting A Target On YouTube Ripping Sites, Despite Their Many Non-Infringing Uses
Funny how the music video itself has no value, but the audio inside it is precious.
What is it that makes the video worth giving away but not the music?
Frankly, I've ripped songs from youtube vids before, but usually just for music I can't buy otherwise. If they won't offer it for sale, why not give it away for free?
On the post: Moral Muppets At Harvard Cave In To The CIA; Rescind Chelsea Manning's Fellowship
Re: Really?
Next >>