Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 12:35pm
Wow
"Nowadays, all a child has to do to access some muck is to log on to the family computer. Within seconds they can see videos of whips, goats, origami and tantric projection - the whole T&A."
Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:05pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"The internet is fast, and the laws have to adjusted to address that speed, and to address the international nature of the net."
Are you serious? Then in that case, lets close all courts around the world, they way to slow for the modern fast past society that we live in. Why waste money on them right? From now on its guilty until proven innocent. No objections allowed!
Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 11:56am
Re: Re: Re: Because it's not-- it's about stopping piracy
Your clearly unbiased view of Google aside 'Bob', please tell us how any of those crime cases make up for the fact of lack of due process in the proposed law for the issue at hand?
Did the mob boss and drug boss and whatever boss you keep mentioning get accused and sentenced from a private entity?
Face it 'bob', none of what you're writing has anything to do with how ProtectIP is made to work.
Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 10:09am
Re:
Let me use a real world example. A guy on a street corner selling drugs, yelling "crack, crack, blow, weed" is in some ways using his first amendment rights to free speech. None of the words are in themselves illegal. He has every right to say whatever he wants on a street corner, if you look at the situation without context.
Actually in this case, they took down the corner to the "dealer" stopping many others who are also there from yelling or talking.
Regardless however, you can't apply a real world example.
So both my point and yours are null and void
On the post: Out ACTA-ing ACTA: All TPP Negotiating Documents To Be Kept Secret Until Four Years After Ratification
Re:
I thought you only post on torrentfreak.com
On the post: DailyDirt: Video Challenges
"The USDA has a Fruits&Veggies contest looking for a 30-second video on how to add more plants to your diet."
On the post: Email Is 40 Years Old
Re: Re: Re: E-mail is so old now
I use a tachyons modem. I get all my packages before I order them.
On the post: Email Is 40 Years Old
E-mail is so old now
On the post: ICANN Takes Over Time Zone Database; Dares Astrolabe To Sue
I bet Astrolabe is asking
On the post: Roger Ebert Points People To The 'Ebert-Edit' Of Psycho On The Pirate Bay
Re: Shorter crap is still crap.
On the post: British Historian On Porn And Internet Censorship: North Korea Is Right -- The Internet Is Our Enemy
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: British Historian On Porn And Internet Censorship: North Korea Is Right -- The Internet Is Our Enemy
Re: Pornotopia
On the post: British Historian On Porn And Internet Censorship: North Korea Is Right -- The Internet Is Our Enemy
Wow
Damn Mr.Stanley, you're into some kinky shit.
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Copyright is no human right
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
what is this naight club, and why do insist it has a basis in non-Newtonian physics?
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are you serious? Then in that case, lets close all courts around the world, they way to slow for the modern fast past society that we live in. Why waste money on them right? From now on its guilty until proven innocent. No objections allowed!
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Because it's not-- it's about stopping piracy
The court said that, this blog covered it before it did. I understand how you would get confused.
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Because it's not-- it's about stopping piracy
Did the mob boss and drug boss and whatever boss you keep mentioning get accused and sentenced from a private entity?
Face it 'bob', none of what you're writing has anything to do with how ProtectIP is made to work.
On the post: Worst Kept Secret Now Confirmed: Government Was Very Involved Helping RIAA/MPAA Negotiate Six Strikes
The question is what is the true public interest?
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Confused Indian Anti-Piracy Group Asks Us To Remove Article It Doesn't Like From Some Other Blog
"Aiplex-an Indian anti-piracy/SEO/medical transcription company"
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re:
Actually in this case, they took down the corner to the "dealer" stopping many others who are also there from yelling or talking.
Regardless however, you can't apply a real world example.
So both my point and yours are null and void
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Because it's not-- it's about stopping piracy
umm, yes it is censorship. You're preventing communication, the communication is neutral to artificial factors. Hence, you are censoring it.
"This site can't make a distinction."
Finally you admit it. Yes, the site allowing communication can't make a distinction.
On the post: Why Can't PROTECT IP Supporters Just Admit That It's About Censorship?
Re: Re: Re: Re: *NO, I DO NOT CONDONE CHILD PORN*
Next >>