I'm considering a move out to a more country location and it looks like I'll have to acquire a T1. Why? Not because there is no service - I have 2 options. It's FAP and CAPs. I could go with Satellite service or with Verizon Wireless broadband. However, I use the internet for consulting. We also use it personally for iTunes etc.
Consider the last Mac leopard update. It was 365 Meg. I have 2 macs. I also run VM's - several XP versions - these all hit with SP3 around the same time as the Mac update. Not to mention we downloaded a movie from I tunes 1.2 gig. I hit 5 gig in about 3 days. That's all perfectly legal and expected downloading.
The Verizon wireless would charge me for overage - and the Satellite? Ugh.
Hughes - Cut off for 24 hours.
Wild Blue - Bandwidth limited (better than being cut off!) for 30 days.
So I'm pricing T1's.
QUERY - are these people really out of bandwidth? Fine. Raise prices and expand your network.
If I make a nifty new device and start selling it - and some company buys one and then copies it exactly - and sells it cheaper - because they don't have to pay the R&D costs for the invention - then they are living large of my work.
Patent law was designed to prevent this sort of thing so that R&D money would be spent and the resulting invention protected for a time.
This is all well and good and explains how the patent system "promotes" innovation by preventing copying.
The CURRENT patent system, however, is a mockery of this ideal in that partial "inventions" that are really obvious are used to hijack someone who DID create a nifty device via their own R&D and sweat and blood.
Why pick on Ipod? There has to be another motive here. Any headset with magnets would cause this and I bet the bigger ones with bigger magnets cause bigger problems.
Even if this makes it far enough to be considered the law of the land, the "review" and "consideration of fair use" is still in the hands of the copyright holder and the issuer of the DMCA take down notice. Therefore - all they have to say is "we considered it and decided it wasn't fair use". Even if it is - and there is still no appeal of the takedown notice and still no way to get the content back online.
There was a story (here I think) sometime back about a url you could visit that would check to see if what you were being served was what was really being served or if something was being inserted into the stream.
Once more - these products are legal in a range of countries.
The companies advertise on Google.
When advertising on Google can one restrict the countries in which one's ads appear? If SO then I can agree with you. If NOT then I think it's up to Google/MS/Yahoo to offer some way to restrict where one's ads show up.
On the post: Scientist Makes Sure That No One Uses His Patent On Malaria Drug To Gouge The Poor
Change the headline
Scientist Makes Sure That No One Uses His Patent On Malaria Drug To Gouge The Poor
Which I read as:
Scientist makes sure no one uses his patent on malaria drug in order to gouge the poor.
It's ambiguous at best. I suggest you change it to:
Scientist makes sure that non one can use his patent to gouge the poor.
That's very clear.
On the post: Massachusetts Wants GPS Driving Tax, Too
Quarter of a Cent?
The GPS units and collection infrastructure can't be paid for with this amount.
Of course taxes always increase. At .01 a mile it would be 220.00 - even that is less than California vehicle registration tax.
On the post: Frontier DSL Stands By Its Caps... Even As It Decreases Broadband Speeds
5 gig?
Consider the last Mac leopard update. It was 365 Meg. I have 2 macs. I also run VM's - several XP versions - these all hit with SP3 around the same time as the Mac update. Not to mention we downloaded a movie from I tunes 1.2 gig. I hit 5 gig in about 3 days. That's all perfectly legal and expected downloading.
The Verizon wireless would charge me for overage - and the Satellite? Ugh.
Hughes - Cut off for 24 hours.
Wild Blue - Bandwidth limited (better than being cut off!) for 30 days.
So I'm pricing T1's.
QUERY - are these people really out of bandwidth? Fine. Raise prices and expand your network.
On the post: Performance Rights Society Calls Small Businesses & Threatens Them Over Music Heard In The Background
Simple Solution
This is absurd.
On the post: White House Confirms: President Keeps His Blackberry
Engadget disagrees
On the post: Once Again, Apple's 200 iPhone Patents Don't Stop Others From Claiming Infringement
What the Patent system was intended for.
Patent law was designed to prevent this sort of thing so that R&D money would be spent and the resulting invention protected for a time.
This is all well and good and explains how the patent system "promotes" innovation by preventing copying.
The CURRENT patent system, however, is a mockery of this ideal in that partial "inventions" that are really obvious are used to hijack someone who DID create a nifty device via their own R&D and sweat and blood.
On the post: In Some Relatively Rare Cases, iPod Headphones May Have Some Impact On Pacemakers
Ipod Only?
On the post: Google On The High Seas
Maybe not so strange.....
On the post: Totally False Propaganda About File Sharing Being Given To Students As Educational Material
"studens"
On the post: Judge Says Copyright Holders Must Consider Fair Use Before Sending DMCA Takedowns
Changes nothing...
On the post: AT&T Says It May Inject Its Own Ads In Your Surfing... And You'll Like It
How to tell if they are doing it?
Does anyone have that link?
Also - wouldn't ssl defeat this?
On the post: Google, Microsoft And Yahoo Sued In India For Not Preventing Sex Selection Ads
Re: Re: Re: We like our government...........
Still - the law is about advertising and if they cannot restrict where their ads appear then they should have no liability.
On the post: Google, Microsoft And Yahoo Sued In India For Not Preventing Sex Selection Ads
Re: Re: We like our government...........
Once more - these products are legal in a range of countries.
The companies advertise on Google.
When advertising on Google can one restrict the countries in which one's ads appear? If SO then I can agree with you. If NOT then I think it's up to Google/MS/Yahoo to offer some way to restrict where one's ads show up.
On the post: Google, Microsoft And Yahoo Sued In India For Not Preventing Sex Selection Ads
Re: RE: What's good for the goose....
Next >>