Verizon Forces Users On To More Expensive Broadband Plans Just To Get $50 Covid Subsidy
from the not-helping dept
As part of a recent COVID bill, the government recently announced that folks struggling economically during COVID would be getting some temporary help. Under the EBB (Emergency broadband Benefit program), U.S. consumers can nab a $50 discount off their broadband bill, or $75 if you live in tribal areas. The program ends when its $3.2 billion in federal funding expires, or six months after the government has declared an end to the pandemic.
It's a useful but temporary band aid, and doesn't really do much to address the regional monopolization and lack of competition that makes US broadband so perennially mediocre in the first place. Nor does it address the fact the Trump FCC gutted its own consumer protection authority because a bunch of telecom monopolies asked them to, using completely bogus justifications.
Under the program, the money is first given to your broadband provider, which is then in charge of ensuring you get the discount. But given these companies' track record of dodgy behavior, it obviously didn't take long for US telecoms to misbehave. Enter Verizon, which is using the program as an opportunity to upsell customers to more expensive plans. Users contacting Verizon to sign up were told the program didn't apply to their existing plans, and in order to get the discount they'd need to sign up for more expensive service. The Washington Post politely points out this is rather sleazy:
"Verizon elicited the most ire from readers. It requires customers to call a phone line to register for the EBB, rather than just signing up online. And when you do, Verizon told some customers the EBB can’t be used on “old” data plans, so they’d have to switch. That might be allowed by the letter of the law but certainly isn’t the spirit of the program."
Granted this is the same company that tried to upsell California firefighters to more costly plans when their data allotment ran out during an historic wildfire, so this shouldn't be too surprising. In short, knowing the subsidy was temporary, Verizon nudged users to more expensive plans so they'd see a revenue boost when the plan ended. U.S. regulators at the FCC didn't do a thing. Fortunately Verizon reversed course after the Post story began circulating online:
"On Wednesday, two days after I initially published this column, Verizon reversed course and said it would accept old plans. “We heard from some customers that they prefer to stay on the legacy plans they have,” it wrote in a blog post. “Moving forward, we will offer customers on legacy Fios plans (no longer in market today) the ability to enroll in EBB."
A few other companies have taken to using misleading websites to trick users into thinking they're enrolling in the government's official program (the real website for which is here).
Needless to say the press shouldn't always be the last line of defense against Americans getting ripped off, especially considering the increasingly tenuous financial situation the press finds itself in. You also wouldn't need a COVID discount program in the first place if the U.S. hadn't spent the last twenty years coddling regional monopolies, resulting in some of the most expensive prices in the developed world for broadband.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, competition, covid, discounts, ebb, fcc, subsidy
Companies: verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
upsell California firefighters during a wildfire
Well, it's no surprise.
These gormless giblet fondlers learned from the best - Enron and Martin Shkreli
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
which was totally necessary cause obviously we couldn't have thought ourselves that this would be considered a bad move.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Merika in a nutshell.
Y'all expect they will do the right thing then are shocked just shocked when they find a way to screw you.
Telco
Cable
Elected Officials
Corps
When y'all gonna learn the lessons from the past?
If there is a way they can screw you, even in the face of armageddon, for a couple cents more they will.
Somehow no one considered that unless it was explicitly spelled out, and even then half the time, they'll screw you.
They screwed fire fighters in the middle of a disaster to get a few cents more, but thought oh they'll do the right thing.
Also missing here is the lesson of we gave them a shit ton of bandwidth & cash to build out a network for first responders... but no one thought to put milestones in it... just keep paying them as they do nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comcast prepaid internet is $45 a month and internet essentials is $10 a month how is that prohibitive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There where ~40 million people utilizing SNAP (ie food stamps) in 2020 to be able to feed themselves and their families. Do you really think every household in the USA have $45 to spare?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reminder that this data "ran out" on a custom plan that Verizon had told the firefighters was a specially-set-up "unlimited" account just for them, after the first time Verizon had throttled them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In short, knowing the subsidy was temporary, Verizon nudged users to more expensive plans so they'd see a revenue boost when the plan ended. U.S. regulators at the FCC didn't do a thing. Fortunately Verizon reversed course after the Post story began circulating online:
Well yeah, they know who's going to be signing their paychecks once they leave the FCC and I imagine it's pretty well known that it's generally not a smart move to badmouth your future boss in public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]