We have "rights" groups that collect licensing fees directly to their own pockets and never even try to find they artists they claim to represent. Complete scam.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: On rights and balanc
At the time it wasn’t. If the Democrats didn’t stand in the way of closing travel from China and the boarder stayed remain in Mexico; it’s likely it would have remained rather low numbers.
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
We have today both the CDC and WHO noting that mask use is also dangerous.
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
Disposable masks in general did not and will not stop the virus.
[Statement proves only that Lostinlodos lacks reading comprehension]
hydroxychloroquine has proven benefits for helping those who were infected
[Asserts facts not outside sham studies]
That’s an intentionally out of context misrepresentation of
[Projects facts not in evidence]
I can’t do anything to change your mind.
Bringing some facts (for once) would work, but here you admit you can't muster any.
One of the hallmarks of spam is lacking specific information., but when "legitimate" DMCA notices go out of their way to be as opaque and lacking in detail as possible (looking at you, twitch), how are people supposed to tell the difference?
a recent and troubling surge in efforts by Democrat officials to pressure the FCC and its regulated entities into censoring news coverage and political speech that Democrats don’t like. The FCC should make clear that it will not operate as the DNC’s speech police.
That's pretty rich, considering that...
...the one and only reason Nathan Simpington is on the FCC board is as part of Republican officials' troubling surge in efforts to pressure the FCC and its regulated entities into censoring news coverage and political speech Republicans don't like, turning the FCC into the GOP's speech police.
Now AT&T's primary motivation for having its broadband data caps passes from "dishonestly hamstringing content competitors" to "pure fraudulent profit."
b. apply censorship, selectively suspend, and anonymous content or user banning standards in a consistent manner among its users on the platform;
Well, since no website has ever, or could ever, censor anyone or anything, this is certainly easy to comply with.
d. not censor a user's content or material or selectively suspend a user from the social media website without providing notification to the user who posted or attempted to post the content or material, or in a way that violates State deceptive and unfair trade practices;
On the post: Twitch Yanks Advertising Revenue From Popular 'Hot Tub Streamer' With No Warning Or Dialogue
Re:
Not surprised bots like Cupcakes here show difficulty in parsing English.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: Newsletter Platform Substack Lets Users Make Most Of The Moderation Calls (2020)
Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Scammers Use The Public's Fear Of Copyright Culture To Trick People Into Installing Malware
Re: Re: 'I learned it from watching you!'
We have "rights" groups that collect licensing fees directly to their own pockets and never even try to find they artists they claim to represent. Complete scam.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: On rights and ba
"Ignore the actual context of Trump;s actual thoughts, and instead look only at this cherry-picked time he stayed on-script!"
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: On rights and balanc
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
[Statement proves only that Lostinlodos lacks reading comprehension]
[Asserts facts not outside sham studies]
[Projects facts not in evidence]
Bringing some facts (for once) would work, but here you admit you can't muster any.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
You've picked weird, dumb hills to die on.
On the post: Scammers Use The Public's Fear Of Copyright Culture To Trick People Into Installing Malware
Re:
What part of "I own 0.1% of the footage in your video, therefore I get monetize it 100% for myself" isn't fraud?
On the post: Scammers Use The Public's Fear Of Copyright Culture To Trick People Into Installing Malware
One of the hallmarks of spam is lacking specific information., but when "legitimate" DMCA notices go out of their way to be as opaque and lacking in detail as possible (looking at you, twitch), how are people supposed to tell the difference?
On the post: FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Not Interested In Baltimore Prosecutor's Request To Have The FCC Investigate Her Critics
...the one and only reason Nathan Simpington is on the FCC board is as part of Republican officials' troubling surge in efforts to pressure the FCC and its regulated entities into censoring news coverage and political speech Republicans don't like, turning the FCC into the GOP's speech police.
On the post: After 50,000 Layoffs And Absolute Chaos, AT&T Ends Its Bungled Media Experiment
Now AT&T's primary motivation for having its broadband data caps passes from "dishonestly hamstringing content competitors" to "pure fraudulent profit."
On the post: Biden Revokes Trump's Silly Executive Order On Section 230; But It Already Did Its Damage
Re:
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re:
By republicans' false definition, not publishing a book is "censorship."
On the post: New Jersey State Legislators Think They Can Get Trump Back On Facebook By Passing A Stupid Social Media Moderation Bill
Re: Short List
Your constant deliberate lying is obscene.
On the post: New Jersey State Legislators Think They Can Get Trump Back On Facebook By Passing A Stupid Social Media Moderation Bill
Well, since no website has ever, or could ever, censor anyone or anything, this is certainly easy to comply with.
see analysis of b.
On the post: UK Now Calling Its 'Online Harms Bill' The 'Online Safety Bill' But A Simple Name Change Won't Fix Its Myriad Problems
Once you understand the plain fact that moderation is free speech, it becomes easily obvious that laws to restrict moderation are always censorious.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re: Re: New platform
Cling to your lies as desperately as you want, but you'll never achieve any comprehension of the world so long as you do.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: New platform
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
That's that we already have today. "Problem" solved.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re: Re: We Knew It Was Just Political
Come back to us the first time someone builds their platform that's a digital public square.
On the post: Wired's Big 230 Piece Has A Narrative To Tell
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
On the post: Michigan Legislator With No Understanding Of The 1st Amendment Wants To Fine Fact Checkers For Pointing Out His Lies
Re: Re: Re: Re:
"What is asserted without evidence, probably came from Out Of The Blue."
Next >>