I think you'll want to read section 2703 of title 18. This little hottie will serve to connect your paths on the Internet at any point in time within the 18months to your account. The proverbial key to the kingdom.
SuperPAC him local style. Plaster the neighborhoods with wild-west style wanted posters of "Have you seen this man? He's armed with a pen and desires the likes of a line item veto on the US Constitution. Extremely dangerous. Hates cats."
Another important element of this bill would allow access to these stores of information with an administrative subpoena. Not to mention the inclusion of the requisite exclusion from liability for the ISP.
Text:
"The USTR needs to be more transparent and inclusive in the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty. The public should be informed by regular drafts of language released and open for comment. Members of Technological and on line civil rights groups should be invited to the negotiations."
Text:
"The USTR needs to be more transparent and inclusive in the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty. The public should be informed by regular drafts of language released and open for comment. Members of Technological and on line civil rights groups should be invited to the negotiations."
If the people were not anonymous then the people would not have Anonymous. Anonymous are the people. Our corporations have been and are attempting to rule and reign over the free world at the expense of the people, the anonymous.
A politician seen donning a Fawkes mask can roughly be indicative, in so far as we've seen, as a representative of the people in the truest sense.
You do not have to agree with Anonymous or their ways at all, however, to believe you're not a part thereof is to have played into the hands of those that are truly not anonymous - the 1% if you will.
The more thought I give to denial of service attacks the more I am inclined to see them as more of the natural and most effective means of short burst protest on the Internet. They are, in effect, a street riot without the street, blood and tear gas.
If only all of DC could be targeted, but, then again, they're already denying service well enough on their own now aren't they?
In substance I find your comment tacitly agreeable.
Any man that looks down on another man for racial, ethnic or even religious reasons is not a whole man and is a burden to men and he should not be carried.
The two images relay wholly separate messages. 100% different level of intimacy. 100% different feeling. 100% different pieces of "art". The medium of one is a moment in time. The medium of the other is a picture of a moment in time.
Any cause of action here should be based entirely upon any direct harm to the original and/or to the original photographer (e.g. Now I can not sell my images, they are worthless (not to be confused with worth less)) - imho.
oh, the Internet couldn't exist without me type yeah?
You clueless wretch.
Your crap is just bits on a stream. If you don't like the water get out, dig your own flow and dam it up any way you like. In short, you're a guest. Please act accordingly.
Why does anyone? It would seem that it doesn't result in much that is good or even reasonable anymore. To concentrate dollars to support the party to enable party people to get elected to hold the party line and fight the *gasp* other party? What's the point of that? Just when do honest to goodness people people matter?
Besides the only thing they're really preventing is progress..on things like who gets to have babies when, who gets healthcare when, who gets married to whom, whose business gets support and whose idea of a supreme being has more influence.
Gosh, I think that a president, once elected should be cut off from party and made to be the "presidential" party by the mere fact of being one and their original party should field another. But then that couldn't earn the party more money now could it? I mean I get it, or I thought I did but, they're really blowing it and it's pretty far from getting any better any time soon.
Christ, the fucking POTUS can't seem to comment on something regarding "law" enforcement but can authorize an assassination of a US citizen. Yeah, that's good that.
The rule of law. WTF, what law? Law. A bit too selective these days that is. Fuck it, how about another? There are business that can't get along without them and law makers not getting paid by those businesses. This is critical stuff folks, the beginning of an era. Strap in.
On the post: Lamar Smith: Enemy Of The Internet? Defends Internet Snooping Bill
Re:
On the post: Lamar Smith: Enemy Of The Internet? Defends Internet Snooping Bill
Re:
On the post: Lamar Smith: Enemy Of The Internet? Defends Internet Snooping Bill
Re: Lamar is just
On the post: Lamar Smith: Enemy Of The Internet? Defends Internet Snooping Bill
Sharing Goverment Style
(google cached doc re: report of adm. subpoena usage: http://bit.ly/wEBa28 )
This guy is quickly setting the bar for "domestic enemy".
On the post: Tell The USTR To Stop Being A Pawn Of Hollywood Lobbyists
x-posted but relevant comment content
Found in BoingBoing Article Comments: http://bit.ly/xxLymr
Petition Address: http://bit.ly/xarv5J
Text:
"The USTR needs to be more transparent and inclusive in the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty. The public should be informed by regular drafts of language released and open for comment. Members of Technological and on line civil rights groups should be invited to the negotiations."
On the post: Hollywood Still Doesn't Realize That The Internet Drives Popular Culture Now
Whitehouse Petition
Found in BoingBoing Article Comments: http://bit.ly/xxLymr
Petition Address: http://bit.ly/xarv5J
Text:
"The USTR needs to be more transparent and inclusive in the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty. The public should be informed by regular drafts of language released and open for comment. Members of Technological and on line civil rights groups should be invited to the negotiations."
On the post: Bulgarian MPs Wear Anonymous/Guy Fawkes Masks To Protest ACTA
Re: In V for Vendatta...
A politician seen donning a Fawkes mask can roughly be indicative, in so far as we've seen, as a representative of the people in the truest sense.
You do not have to agree with Anonymous or their ways at all, however, to believe you're not a part thereof is to have played into the hands of those that are truly not anonymous - the 1% if you will.
On the post: Bulgarian MPs Wear Anonymous/Guy Fawkes Masks To Protest ACTA
Re:
The more thought I give to denial of service attacks the more I am inclined to see them as more of the natural and most effective means of short burst protest on the Internet. They are, in effect, a street riot without the street, blood and tear gas.
If only all of DC could be targeted, but, then again, they're already denying service well enough on their own now aren't they?
On the post: Is The US Meddling In Polish ACTA Voting?
Re:
On the post: Poland Prime Minister Suspends Any Effort To Ratify ACTA; May Kill ACTA In The EU
Re: Re: Viva Poland!!!
Any man that looks down on another man for racial, ethnic or even religious reasons is not a whole man and is a burden to men and he should not be carried.
On the post: One Nation, Under Guard
Re:
On the post: When Judges Are Determining Whether Or Not Art Should Exist... We Have A Problem
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I really am confused
On the post: When Judges Are Determining Whether Or Not Art Should Exist... We Have A Problem
Re: Re: Re: Re: I really am confused
Any cause of action here should be based entirely upon any direct harm to the original and/or to the original photographer (e.g. Now I can not sell my images, they are worthless (not to be confused with worth less)) - imho.
On the post: Hollywood Still Doesn't Realize That The Internet Drives Popular Culture Now
Re: Re: Re:
You clueless wretch.
Your crap is just bits on a stream. If you don't like the water get out, dig your own flow and dam it up any way you like. In short, you're a guest. Please act accordingly.
On the post: Documentary Filmmaker Arrested At Congressional Hearing For Filming With A Different Opinion
Re: Re: The embedded video ...
On the post: Documentary Filmmaker Arrested At Congressional Hearing For Filming With A Different Opinion
Re: What is the penalty for violating the Constitution?
Penalty should be the immediate removal from office until proven innocent. Let it roll like everything else.
On the post: Senator Wyden Attacked For Actually Trying To Get Stuff Done, Rather Than Playing Partisan Politics
Re: DEMAND THEIR RESIGNATIONS!!!
Why does anyone? It would seem that it doesn't result in much that is good or even reasonable anymore. To concentrate dollars to support the party to enable party people to get elected to hold the party line and fight the *gasp* other party? What's the point of that? Just when do honest to goodness people people matter?
Besides the only thing they're really preventing is progress..on things like who gets to have babies when, who gets healthcare when, who gets married to whom, whose business gets support and whose idea of a supreme being has more influence.
Gosh, I think that a president, once elected should be cut off from party and made to be the "presidential" party by the mere fact of being one and their original party should field another. But then that couldn't earn the party more money now could it? I mean I get it, or I thought I did but, they're really blowing it and it's pretty far from getting any better any time soon.
Christ, the fucking POTUS can't seem to comment on something regarding "law" enforcement but can authorize an assassination of a US citizen. Yeah, that's good that.
The rule of law. WTF, what law? Law. A bit too selective these days that is. Fuck it, how about another? There are business that can't get along without them and law makers not getting paid by those businesses. This is critical stuff folks, the beginning of an era. Strap in.
On the post: Senator Wyden Attacked For Actually Trying To Get Stuff Done, Rather Than Playing Partisan Politics
two ring poop hoops
If the people lead then the leaders will have to follow.
On the post: CreativeAmerica Literally Resorts To Buying Signatures
Re: Re: Re: Re: Something about hammers...
On the post: White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation
Law enforcement action? Oh, please forgive us for seeking remedial steps in an attempt to prevent the reign of madness.
Weapons of mass destruction.. indeed.
Accountability. Integrity. Duty. Justice. Honesty. Truth. Have I left anything relevant off of the "Do Not Disturb" list?
Next >>