Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change y
While I wasn’t referring to the KSP shutting that down well into build was as dome and politically self serving as ending wall construction.
we had renewed use of clean(we) coal.
Arctic drilling, and NWS drilling.
All ended immediately under Biden.
The most logical thing to do is use what we have until a replacement is implemented. Not turn off and shut down and hope the replacements come soon…enough.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to
Obama constantly called for border security.
And the Trump era wall, well, that’s not the cause of the massive amount of people Illegally entering. It’s where the wall isn’t at, and the fact we can’t arrest and deport under current regulations.
People walk around the wall in most cases. Or drive around it.
Or climb over or under chain link sections.
The wall definitely reduced crossings where it is built.
Well, unless you on iOS Dev beta 15.
Where autocorrect does what the hell it wants.
but since I’ve never meet an electrical engineer that wouldn’t run at the sign of code … it doesn’t matter.
in reality I could technically call myself a professional engineer as well. I’m ASE certified and added a guidance and control engineer certificate.
Here’s the reality, I can plug my phone or laptop in and tell you what is wrong. Then I say take it to a mechanic. Lol.
In other words my family and our friends, tell a quality mec, skip the $75 diagnostic and ‘fix this, this, and this, only’.
I have no clue how to fix it or why it needs to be fixed.
;)
I have two Microsoft engineering certificates. That also allows the term Professional engineer.
TLDR: the word engineer means nothing alone. Even when you stick professional in front of it.
No single group has complete control over every use of “professional engineering”.
You know, I agree with specific tos. Despite the difficulties that has. If you don’t have enough people to moderate hire more.
But your running around, at 10 foot tall 400 pound chest thumping with your 12 pack abs calling people names and threatening to fight… you again, look like the school yard bully. A spoiled child of an adult with daddy issues in dire need of a hard spiked paddle spanking.
Can you seriously not hid a discussion without name calling and temper tantrums?
Maybe it’s time to change your diaper?
Amazon ships for free for prime members.
Or are you just hungry?
I can Uber you some food if you want.
Maybe I should just call ems. Anyone who can spew so much shite has an obvious digestive issue.
Seriously. You’ve some real issues to look into. Such as why are you here. I engage and try to learn and understand. Agree or not in the end.
You just fight. Your lonely huh.
I’ll order you a stuffed pig. Or an elephant. Hell, both. You just need something to cuddle.
I always got a kick out of men squirming over female topics.
To be honest I’m a mixed setting I’d sometimes drop something into discussion just to make them uncomfortable.
Most men have too many issues to explain.
Generally, it’s… “she said bra, huk huk” if Not “oh my god the b word”.
I’ve gotten into situations of being shunned because I’ll often go to a woman for help. But nothing has happened in over 4 decades to change my opinion that anything a man can do a woman can do better.
That said the metoo movement has caused problems of its own that didn’t exist.
It’s no longer just bad “come over here and we’ll see what comes up”.
Or over the line “sit on my face”.
Now even stuff that should be acceptable (you look great today) is taboo.
Telling someone you like their new shoes can set of a chain reaction.
We’ve gone from ignoring the issues to treating every word as a dagger.
And that’s just as bad.
Hopefully some day people will just come to understand plugs and sockets are only different in design, not general function. And does little for intelligence.
I’m a guy, btw. If talking about a bra makes you uncomfortable you have a serious issue to ponder.
There’s three separate issues in the linked films.
First: we have cops who abused their power with excessive force. Assault. Battery. And a host of other crimes. Mind you fleeing an officer is a crime in most of the country.
Second: the filming bystanders were within
20 feet of the officers. Therefore breaking the law.
Third: the response To the offenders who were filming were also excessive.
It’s good to point out all issues.
The law didn’t cause the problem. The extreme overreaction by the officers did.
I have serious problems with software refunds. This coming from someone who develops under the IDGAF premise.
I could understand maybe a 15 or 20 minute, 30 minute window. Making sure the game actually plays on your setup. GTA V for example has a massively long intro of on-rails play.
Driver as well. Etc.
2 hours? 2 long!
First of all little squirts that want to play fraud should have just pirated the game. Not only did you take it from the developers, you cost the platform money in the transaction, and refund.
That’s worse than “piracy” alone!
I’m not sure about windows but the Mac games I have from steam are full single bundle packages.
Meaning once I have the game, I have the game. The package can be copied elsewhere and still runs just fine. Without steam.
So these users can refund the game and keep it, as well. Giving rise to my concern about refunds.
There’s a reason (many) stores don’t take physical returns when the item is opened.
I understand not playing a game, or it not running, or it being a scam, etc.
But if 20 people buy a game and give it a 1 spam rating there’s and obvious issue. If 20 people buy the game and 19 give it 10 and 15 returned the game, there’s a problem with the system.
Or simply got the vision done in that frame of time?
Short stories sell well world wide. Some sites sell amateur writing shorts as a subscription, etc. others are $0.99 on Amazon.
And often enough someone is hit. Especially along the Texas border.
Maybe the agent should man up and cross the border to face trial. Maybe not. The reality is he’d face man slaughter in the US and murder in Mexico.
Again, just because the clip shows no rock throwing doesn’t show what happened before the clip turned on. And doesn’t necessarily exclude the agent being hit off camera.
Unlike others though I first and foremost respect the facts of law, followed by innocent until proven guilty (or a factual evidence is undeniable).
I don’t deny what we did, and what all colonialism did, was wrong.
But that same thought as yours says I can walk into your house, plop down on the couch, fart a bit and and watch your tv. Since you don’t belong there either.
Right?
The natives have far more right to the land than we do. But we set our borders and are recognised every other state in the world.
As such we have legal jurisdiction. As resident or as conqueror. Or as brutal savage. However you want to look at it. Today, it is ours.
Actually, no I don’t.
If there is a matching crime in both countries I support extradition. In this case the US should turn over the agents to Mexican authorities.
If there is NOT a matching crime in both countries then they shouldnnot comply with extradition. KimDotCom has not violated NZ law, thus should not be extradited.
A) the responsibility of prosecuting is in the country where the crime happened.
B) no country should be allowed to force their laws onto another.
C) the crime charges must match the crime committed.
In this case if the person was throwing rocks across the border we have an assailant. Thus the proper charge(s) would be excessive force and involuntary man slaughter.
On the assumption that the DOS would extradite on those charges (which is unlikely but not the point), they are correct because it’s unlikely murder would stick through appeals even if the entirety of the events was within the United States.
Don’t misinterpret my defence of the law as defence of the act.
He killed a person and should be held accountable. But that should be within the confines of the legal process.
Well, actually they probably originated in Russia but that’s not the point.
does not mean that he didn't murder someone
I’m it arguing that the alleged crime didn’t happen. Just that the Mexico is the country of jurisdiction.
grieving family decided to set up a bloody sniper and start going after ICE agents then they would not be committing murder because they were just 'aiming across the border and shooting' and it would just be a complete coincidence that those bullets landed in warm bodies on the other side.
In such a case the crime happens in the US. The government must seek extradition. Mexico may or may not comply. Since no crim
Happened on the Mexican side.
basically treat borders as magical 'crimes cannot pass' boundaries where so long as an atrocity starts on one side and ends in the other no crime has been committed
Not all all. They’re magical jurisdictional boundaries. The alleged crime was in Mexico. The victim was in Mexico. The law
Dictates mexico as the country of pursuit.
The family must file in mexico. The us has no mandate to send anyone anywhere.
If the do they do. If they don’t they don’t.
You may not like borders and Sovereignty but that’s the way most of the world conducts itself. Legal ability stops at the border.
That’s why Mexican cartel bullets striking Americans go unpunished as well.
Keep in mind mexico could try and convict him in absence of physical presence. Then arrest him if he ever crossed the border.
And yes, they could arrest him if he crossed the border and then try him. But the former makes more sense.
Again, opinion doesn’t matter. The alleged crime was on the other side of the border.
TLDR.
Mainly because it’s just a WOT and no paragraphing.
And it is too long I write long detailed posts, if it’s too long for me it’s just too long.
Sorry.
Oh, they tried - but the DOJ said nope. If Mesa steps foot in Mexico he will be charged with murder.
Yep. That’s how the law works.
The victim is in Mexico. The crime was in Mexico.
The US is under no obligation to extradite anyone.
The crime is committed when the bullet penetrated the skin. That happened in Mexico.
From a legal standpoint all that happened in the US was a man firing his gun towards the border. Once the bullet leaves the US border it’s no longer under US jurisdiction.
No evidence there. Just a news write up. Supposedly there’s video and the kid wasn’t throwing rocks in the video, which doesn’t cover when the camera wasn’t on anyway.
But that’s besides the point.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
How ye forget:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/apr/23/mick-mulvaney/fact-check-did-top-democrats -vote-border-wall-2006/
But also we can look at
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2013/jul/01/debbie-wasserman-schultz/more-border-secu rity-and-patrols-under-obama-previ/
A wall need not be solid. A line of fence is also a wall.
And there’s plenty of video evidence of him
Using the term “wall” in more than one instance, including a state of the union address.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change y
While I wasn’t referring to the KSP shutting that down well into build was as dome and politically self serving as ending wall construction.
we had renewed use of clean(we) coal.
Arctic drilling, and NWS drilling.
All ended immediately under Biden.
The most logical thing to do is use what we have until a replacement is implemented. Not turn off and shut down and hope the replacements come soon…enough.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to
Obama constantly called for border security.
And the Trump era wall, well, that’s not the cause of the massive amount of people Illegally entering. It’s where the wall isn’t at, and the fact we can’t arrest and deport under current regulations.
People walk around the wall in most cases. Or drive around it.
Or climb over or under chain link sections.
The wall definitely reduced crossings where it is built.
On the post: Miami Beach PD Blocks Enforcement Of New Law Miami Beach Cops Abused To Arrest People For Filming Them
Yes. At the same time the law had the ability to keep bystanders fro
Corrupting a crime scene.
All offending officers should be tried and convicted.
But there is good in the law. Despite the misuse.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re:
Well, unless you on iOS Dev beta 15.
Where autocorrect does what the hell it wants.
but since I’ve never meet an electrical engineer that wouldn’t run at the sign of code … it doesn’t matter.
in reality I could technically call myself a professional engineer as well. I’m ASE certified and added a guidance and control engineer certificate.
Here’s the reality, I can plug my phone or laptop in and tell you what is wrong. Then I say take it to a mechanic. Lol.
In other words my family and our friends, tell a quality mec, skip the $75 diagnostic and ‘fix this, this, and this, only’.
I have no clue how to fix it or why it needs to be fixed.
;)
I have two Microsoft engineering certificates. That also allows the term Professional engineer.
TLDR: the word engineer means nothing alone. Even when you stick professional in front of it.
No single group has complete control over every use of “professional engineering”.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Duh!
You know, I agree with specific tos. Despite the difficulties that has. If you don’t have enough people to moderate hire more.
But your running around, at 10 foot tall 400 pound chest thumping with your 12 pack abs calling people names and threatening to fight… you again, look like the school yard bully. A spoiled child of an adult with daddy issues in dire need of a hard spiked paddle spanking.
Can you seriously not hid a discussion without name calling and temper tantrums?
Maybe it’s time to change your diaper?
Amazon ships for free for prime members.
Or are you just hungry?
I can Uber you some food if you want.
Maybe I should just call ems. Anyone who can spew so much shite has an obvious digestive issue.
Seriously. You’ve some real issues to look into. Such as why are you here. I engage and try to learn and understand. Agree or not in the end.
You just fight. Your lonely huh.
I’ll order you a stuffed pig. Or an elephant. Hell, both. You just need something to cuddle.
On the post: A Guy Walks Into A Bra
I always got a kick out of men squirming over female topics.
To be honest I’m a mixed setting I’d sometimes drop something into discussion just to make them uncomfortable.
Most men have too many issues to explain.
Generally, it’s… “she said bra, huk huk” if Not “oh my god the b word”.
I’ve gotten into situations of being shunned because I’ll often go to a woman for help. But nothing has happened in over 4 decades to change my opinion that anything a man can do a woman can do better.
That said the metoo movement has caused problems of its own that didn’t exist.
It’s no longer just bad “come over here and we’ll see what comes up”.
Or over the line “sit on my face”.
Now even stuff that should be acceptable (you look great today) is taboo.
Telling someone you like their new shoes can set of a chain reaction.
We’ve gone from ignoring the issues to treating every word as a dagger.
And that’s just as bad.
Hopefully some day people will just come to understand plugs and sockets are only different in design, not general function. And does little for intelligence.
I’m a guy, btw. If talking about a bra makes you uncomfortable you have a serious issue to ponder.
On the post: Miami Beach PD Blocks Enforcement Of New Law Miami Beach Cops Abused To Arrest People For Filming Them
There’s three separate issues in the linked films.
First: we have cops who abused their power with excessive force. Assault. Battery. And a host of other crimes. Mind you fleeing an officer is a crime in most of the country.
Second: the filming bystanders were within
20 feet of the officers. Therefore breaking the law.
Third: the response To the offenders who were filming were also excessive.
It’s good to point out all issues.
The law didn’t cause the problem. The extreme overreaction by the officers did.
On the post: Indie Game Dev Decides To Leave Industry Due To Steam Returns On Short Game
Possibly and maybe
I have serious problems with software refunds. This coming from someone who develops under the IDGAF premise.
I could understand maybe a 15 or 20 minute, 30 minute window. Making sure the game actually plays on your setup. GTA V for example has a massively long intro of on-rails play.
Driver as well. Etc.
2 hours? 2 long!
First of all little squirts that want to play fraud should have just pirated the game. Not only did you take it from the developers, you cost the platform money in the transaction, and refund.
That’s worse than “piracy” alone!
I’m not sure about windows but the Mac games I have from steam are full single bundle packages.
Meaning once I have the game, I have the game. The package can be copied elsewhere and still runs just fine. Without steam.
So these users can refund the game and keep it, as well. Giving rise to my concern about refunds.
There’s a reason (many) stores don’t take physical returns when the item is opened.
I understand not playing a game, or it not running, or it being a scam, etc.
But if 20 people buy a game and give it a 1 spam rating there’s and obvious issue. If 20 people buy the game and 19 give it 10 and 15 returned the game, there’s a problem with the system.
On the post: Indie Game Dev Decides To Leave Industry Due To Steam Returns On Short Game
Re: Re: Re: Crybaby nonsense
Or simply got the vision done in that frame of time?
Short stories sell well world wide. Some sites sell amateur writing shorts as a subscription, etc. others are $0.99 on Amazon.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re:
This happens all the time
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2021/08/09/us-border-agent-texas-shot-at-across-mexican-border/
And often enough someone is hit. Especially along the Texas border.
Maybe the agent should man up and cross the border to face trial. Maybe not. The reality is he’d face man slaughter in the US and murder in Mexico.
Again, just because the clip shows no rock throwing doesn’t show what happened before the clip turned on. And doesn’t necessarily exclude the agent being hit off camera.
Unlike others though I first and foremost respect the facts of law, followed by innocent until proven guilty (or a factual evidence is undeniable).
On the post: Man Who Was Ejected From The United States After Appearing In A Film Critical Of ICE Asks Court To Roll Back Removal
Re: Re: One single line covers it
I don’t deny what we did, and what all colonialism did, was wrong.
But that same thought as yours says I can walk into your house, plop down on the couch, fart a bit and and watch your tv. Since you don’t belong there either.
Right?
The natives have far more right to the land than we do. But we set our borders and are recognised every other state in the world.
As such we have legal jurisdiction. As resident or as conqueror. Or as brutal savage. However you want to look at it. Today, it is ours.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually, no I don’t.
If there is a matching crime in both countries I support extradition. In this case the US should turn over the agents to Mexican authorities.
If there is NOT a matching crime in both countries then they shouldnnot comply with extradition. KimDotCom has not violated NZ law, thus should not be extradited.
A) the responsibility of prosecuting is in the country where the crime happened.
B) no country should be allowed to force their laws onto another.
C) the crime charges must match the crime committed.
In this case if the person was throwing rocks across the border we have an assailant. Thus the proper charge(s) would be excessive force and involuntary man slaughter.
On the assumption that the DOS would extradite on those charges (which is unlikely but not the point), they are correct because it’s unlikely murder would stick through appeals even if the entirety of the events was within the United States.
Don’t misinterpret my defence of the law as defence of the act.
He killed a person and should be held accountable. But that should be within the confines of the legal process.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well, actually they probably originated in Russia but that’s not the point.
I’m it arguing that the alleged crime didn’t happen. Just that the Mexico is the country of jurisdiction.
In such a case the crime happens in the US. The government must seek extradition. Mexico may or may not comply. Since no crim
Happened on the Mexican side.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not all all. They’re magical jurisdictional boundaries. The alleged crime was in Mexico. The victim was in Mexico. The law
Dictates mexico as the country of pursuit.
The family must file in mexico. The us has no mandate to send anyone anywhere.
If the do they do. If they don’t they don’t.
You may not like borders and Sovereignty but that’s the way most of the world conducts itself. Legal ability stops at the border.
That’s why Mexican cartel bullets striking Americans go unpunished as well.
Keep in mind mexico could try and convict him in absence of physical presence. Then arrest him if he ever crossed the border.
And yes, they could arrest him if he crossed the border and then try him. But the former makes more sense.
Again, opinion doesn’t matter. The alleged crime was on the other side of the border.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How T
Oh,
Lol! My bad.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re:
TLDR.
Mainly because it’s just a WOT and no paragraphing.
And it is too long I write long detailed posts, if it’s too long for me it’s just too long.
Sorry.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yep. That’s how the law works.
The victim is in Mexico. The crime was in Mexico.
The US is under no obligation to extradite anyone.
The crime is committed when the bullet penetrated the skin. That happened in Mexico.
From a legal standpoint all that happened in the US was a man firing his gun towards the border. Once the bullet leaves the US border it’s no longer under US jurisdiction.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Better. And I’ll take your word for it since the video won’t actually play for me.
On the post: Ninth Circuit: Sorry, But We Have No Way To Hold Border Patrol Agents Accountable For Killing People In Mexico
Re: Re: Re: Re:
No evidence there. Just a news write up. Supposedly there’s video and the kid wasn’t throwing rocks in the video, which doesn’t cover when the camera wasn’t on anyway.
But that’s besides the point.
Next >>