Probably because he got a first hand look at what happened when people's rights were abused and led to war. Our current crop of politico's avoid personally fighting in the wars they create.
She accepts donations from groups that abuse women all the while giving lip service to helping abused women. She advocates spying on everyone while secretly making deals to exempt herself.
The most damming things of all in my opinion is that she has gone on record saying she considers being a multimillionaire as dead broke, since she isn't a billionaire. As well as the "what does it matter" scandal.
Much like several recent presidents you know she is lying when ever she opens her mouth.
Anyone who votes for someone that has clearly shown they will sacrifice the rights and lives of their fellow citizens for personal gain, deserves that sort of president.
Always easier to let an attack happen and people die to get laws passed that only empower yourself. I mean if they stopped the attack they would have no fodder to get those anti freedom laws passed.
Re: Re: Who the fuck are we to decide what's 'right'?
care to counter his argument with some facts of your own? or just say that 1 statement and expect people to believe you versus the evidence in his statement
"it can't happen here" blinds people to the reality.
Most would prefer to stay willfully blind than admit things are not perfect. I have given up trying to alert my friends and family to what is happening. Most think I am nuts, for believing history is repeating itself.
If you live in the states I suggest emigrating asap if you can as it will be messy.
Yes I realize the article states ISIS but do you really think that's the only people they will go after? That they will not use this power to imprison other groups of people they do not like?
Who said anything about ISIS. Ideology applies to every group they disagree with. Be it Occupy, NRA, general protesters, environmentalists, people that want to secede from the states. the list is infinite.
You do not have to be a member of the ideals of ISIS to be considered a threat to the state. You just have to think for yourself and not support the government 100%.
Those nonexistent FEMA camps sure would come in handy for situations like this that supposedly also do not exist. Since those of us who believe in such things are all wearing tinfoil on our heads.
When we are not bust designing fake terrorism plots to support our anti freedom laws we are ignoring the warning signs from our surveillance about actual terrorists. So give us more power and less accountability and we promise we will do better.
how would allowing more law abiding citizens to have guns be a bad thing in this scenario? They could have fought back against their attackers instead of waiting to be shot.
Criminals never obey gun laws, yet law abiding citizens do. I would think you would want the people following the laws to outnumber the criminals when it comes to owning a gun
an addendum, apparently 8 of the 9 were on the French intelligence's watch list. But for whatever reason they decided to stop paying attention to what they were doing in the days leading up to the attack.
I keep reading that the French intelligence were watching these guys and decided to do nothing to stop them.
Or phrased differently, they let the attacks happen to reap the benefits of so many terrified people willing to give up their rights in an effort to prevent it from never happening again.
On the post: Hillary Clinton Joins The 'Make Silicon Valley Break Encryption' Bandwagon
Re: Re: Re: When?
On the post: Hillary Clinton Joins The 'Make Silicon Valley Break Encryption' Bandwagon
Re: Re:
On the post: Hillary Clinton Joins The 'Make Silicon Valley Break Encryption' Bandwagon
She accepts donations from groups that abuse women all the while giving lip service to helping abused women. She advocates spying on everyone while secretly making deals to exempt herself.
The most damming things of all in my opinion is that she has gone on record saying she considers being a multimillionaire as dead broke, since she isn't a billionaire. As well as the "what does it matter" scandal.
Much like several recent presidents you know she is lying when ever she opens her mouth.
Anyone who votes for someone that has clearly shown they will sacrifice the rights and lives of their fellow citizens for personal gain, deserves that sort of president.
On the post: Ted Koppel Writes Entire Book About How Hackers Will Take Down Our Electric Grid... And Never Spoke To Any Experts
On the post: The Paris Attacks And The Encryption/Surveillance Bogeyman: The Story So Far
Re:
On the post: The Paris Attacks And The Encryption/Surveillance Bogeyman: The Story So Far
On the post: DailyDirt: Does It Take A Village Or A Japanese Metropolis?
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
Re: Re: Who the fuck are we to decide what's 'right'?
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
Re:
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
Re:
Most would prefer to stay willfully blind than admit things are not perfect. I have given up trying to alert my friends and family to what is happening. Most think I am nuts, for believing history is repeating itself.
If you live in the states I suggest emigrating asap if you can as it will be messy.
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
Re: Re: Suspected ISIS supporters?!?
On the post: Pure Copyfraud: Anne Frank Foundation Trying To Pretend Her Father Wrote Her Diary... To Extend Its Copyright
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
Re: Suspected ISIS supporters?!?
You do not have to be a member of the ideals of ISIS to be considered a threat to the state. You just have to think for yourself and not support the government 100%.
On the post: US Official Admits That Following Terrorist Attacks, It Starts Arresting People Based On Ideology To 'Get Them Off The Streets'
On the post: Judge Pushes Burden Of Proof Back On DEA Agents Who Seized $11,000 From Traveling College Student
On the post: Pathological: Surveillance State Defenders Use Their Own Failure In Paris To Justify Mass Surveillance
On the post: Next Shoe Drops For Prenda's Paul Hansmeier: Minnesota Law Board Seeks To Disbar Him
He is lucky, normally he would be lynched and hung from a tree for his transgressions.
On the post: Is There Any Evidence In The World That Would Convince Intelligence Community That More Surveillance Isn't The Answer?
Re: No, see the NRA for another example of this
Criminals never obey gun laws, yet law abiding citizens do. I would think you would want the people following the laws to outnumber the criminals when it comes to owning a gun
On the post: France Already Expanded Surveillance Twice In The Past Year -- Perhaps Expanding It Again Is Not The Answer?
Re:
On the post: France Already Expanded Surveillance Twice In The Past Year -- Perhaps Expanding It Again Is Not The Answer?
Or phrased differently, they let the attacks happen to reap the benefits of so many terrified people willing to give up their rights in an effort to prevent it from never happening again.
Next >>