And Koby's lying proves your hopes shall remain unfulfilled another day.
Incorrect. Ginsburg is trying to unlawfully conteol Google/Apple's speech, which is the one thing section 230 prevents.
Of course, given the subject at issue, perhaps not even that.
If peiple weren't allowed to lie in court filings, O'keefe would have had to file a single sheet of paper with only his name on it.
It's a separate problem that falsehoods are allowed in court filings, but that's not splinter/Gizmodo's responsibility.
[Asseets facts not in evidence]
Ugh, why is Techdirt the only site that randomly signs me out for no reason?
Close. It's gun control that was made to make sure the "undesirables" were unarmed.
Actual censorship: Koby and his fellow fascists making free speech illegal with Section 230 "reform."
Hallucinatory censorship: "leftists" engaging in thevkinds of free speech Koby doesn't like.
Meanwhile, Koby hallucinates "left-wing fascism" in the next thread over.
[Projects facts not in evidence]
It's also projection, as the replies to his comments that agree with him always come from himself, as we can see when he forgets to switch TOR notes before praising himself.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200916/15162045323/make-him-suspect-documents-show-rochester-pds -response-to-officers-killing-unarmed-black-man.shtml
Interesting that literally none of that actually happened.
And by 'interesting' I mean you're a pathetic excuse of a troll.
Which is why Facebok supports modifying section 230 - to strangle its upstart competitors.
You are simply labeling opinion you don't want to read as "spam"
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
Jhon Smith hates that google is wise to his planned defamation scam.
Blue never has anything to say, but he's never let that stop him from saying it anyway.
Those that say he was innocent despite the evidence...
You can say they're... Chauvinists.
Those that rant against the free speech of moderation don't.
Next >>
On the post: Google Says Pretty Much Everything Shields It From Being Sued Over Things Telegram Users Said
Re: Section 230 Protects Anti-Semites as well!
And Koby's lying proves your hopes shall remain unfulfilled another day.
On the post: Google Says Pretty Much Everything Shields It From Being Sued Over Things Telegram Users Said
Re: Re: Section 230 Protects Anti-Semites as well!
Incorrect. Ginsburg is trying to unlawfully conteol Google/Apple's speech, which is the one thing section 230 prevents.
On the post: James O'Keefe Sues Twitter For Defamation... For Shutting Down His Account
Re:
Of course, given the subject at issue, perhaps not even that.
On the post: James O'Keefe Sues Twitter For Defamation... For Shutting Down His Account
If peiple weren't allowed to lie in court filings, O'keefe would have had to file a single sheet of paper with only his name on it.
On the post: Appeals Court Says Former Trump Advisor Can't Sue Over Reporting Based On Court Documents
It's a separate problem that falsehoods are allowed in court filings, but that's not splinter/Gizmodo's responsibility.
On the post: James O'Keefe Sues Twitter For Defamation... For Shutting Down His Account
Re: Selective Enforcement
[Asseets facts not in evidence]
On the post: James O'Keefe Sues Twitter For Defamation... For Shutting Down His Account
Re:
Ugh, why is Techdirt the only site that randomly signs me out for no reason?
On the post: Florida Governor Signs Law That Punishes Protesters For Protesting, Denies Them Bail
Re: Re:
Close. It's gun control that was made to make sure the "undesirables" were unarmed.
On the post: How Do You Debate Section 230 When One Side Constantly Lies About It?
Re: Re: That's How
Actual censorship: Koby and his fellow fascists making free speech illegal with Section 230 "reform."
Hallucinatory censorship: "leftists" engaging in thevkinds of free speech Koby doesn't like.
On the post: Florida Governor Signs Law That Punishes Protesters For Protesting, Denies Them Bail
Meanwhile, Koby hallucinates "left-wing fascism" in the next thread over.
On the post: How Do You Debate Section 230 When One Side Constantly Lies About It?
Re: That's How
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: The Trump-Hyped Foxconn Wisconsin Deal Finally Falls Completely Apart
Re: Re: Re: It didn't "fall apart" -- scaled down.
It's also projection, as the replies to his comments that agree with him always come from himself, as we can see when he forgets to switch TOR notes before praising himself.
On the post: The Other George Floyd Story: How Media Freedom Led To Conviction In His Killer's Trial
Re: Re:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200916/15162045323/make-him-suspect-documents-show-rochester-pds -response-to-officers-killing-unarmed-black-man.shtml
On the post: The Other George Floyd Story: How Media Freedom Led To Conviction In His Killer's Trial
Re: Astonishing
Interesting that literally none of that actually happened.
And by 'interesting' I mean you're a pathetic excuse of a troll.
On the post: The Other George Floyd Story: How Media Freedom Led To Conviction In His Killer's Trial
Re: Re: 'Oh noes, not the briar patch Mr. Senators...'
Which is why Facebok supports modifying section 230 - to strangle its upstart competitors.
On the post: The Other George Floyd Story: How Media Freedom Led To Conviction In His Killer's Trial
Re: Re: "A. Stephen Stone" show ONE not on topic and c
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: Google Refuses To Honor Questionable Requests For Removal Of 'Defamatory' Content (2019)
Jhon Smith hates that google is wise to his planned defamation scam.
On the post: The Trump-Hyped Foxconn Wisconsin Deal Finally Falls Completely Apart
Re: Re: Helpful advice from "drkkgt" breaking 17 month
Blue never has anything to say, but he's never let that stop him from saying it anyway.
On the post: Filming Cops Is The Best Accountability Tool: Officer Derek Chauvin Convicted Of Murder For Killing George Floyd
Re:
Those that say he was innocent despite the evidence...
You can say they're... Chauvinists.
On the post: Morrissey Thinks Free Speech No Longer Exists Because He Can't Sue The Simpsons For Satirizing Him
Re:
Those that rant against the free speech of moderation don't.
Next >>